No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

5 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · June 3, 2011 · in the opinion

    Bowser v. Parker-Hannifin Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2011)

    …regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked."\[23\] At least one federal circuit decision, Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., applied Lohrmann's so-called "frequency, regularity…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · October 15, 2019 · in the opinion

    Fullen v. 3M Company (2019)

    …s Motion to Dismiss Claim for Punitive Damages, Plaintiffs stated that Lockheed had asserted the improper standard for punitive damages in a case such as this one, and then they cited to Owens-Illinois, Inc. v…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · March 28, 2016 · in the opinion

    Walashek v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)

    …A. Governing Law In asbestos-related latent injury cases, the plaintiff "must first establish some threshold exposure to the defendant's defective asbestos-containing products." Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953, 982 (1997…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · February 16, 2016 · in the opinion

    Walashek v. Air Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)

    …medical probability that a particular exposure or series of exposures was a "legal cause" of his injury — i.e., a substantial factor in bringing about the injury. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 6, 2020 · in the opinion

    Barr v. Parker-Hannifin Corp. (2020)

    …no evidence that Kleinberg was ever exposed to asbestos or that he brought asbestos home on his clothing. Without evidence of exposure there is no causation. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…