No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

1,155 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”, page 10 of 58

  1. Company or organization · People and organizations

    Public Relations Department

  2. Company or organization · People and organizations

    Chemical Mixing Department

  3. Company or organization · People and organizations

    Corporate Communications Department

  4. Company or organization · People and organizations

    Materials Engineering

  5. Company or organization · People and organizations

    West Virginia Plant

  6. Company or organization · People and organizations

    Insurance Department

  7. Company or organization · People and organizations

    Bushy Run Research Center

  8. Company or organization · People and organizations

    Inter Division

  9. Company document · Union Carbide documents · March 16, 1978

    Union Carbide Suppliers' Information Form for Pelletized Asbestos Std. Grade 103, Armstrong Cork Co. Spec. No. 105146 (1978)

    A form headed 'Suppliers' Information for Purchase Specification, Storage, and Safety', filled in by hand for Union Carbide's pelletized asbestos, standard grade 103, with Armstrong Cork Co. specification number 105146. It lists the material as…

  10. Company document · Union Carbide documents · October 25, 1999

    Union Carbide Proxy Statement/Prospectus Supplement on Restated Earnings and the Dow Merger, with Related Merger Materials (1999)

    …21, 2000, on a letter agreement with Dow Chemical about the merger agreement Website printout 'Union Carbide Corporation A Brief Chronology', 1917-1999 Beginning of the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · September 8, 2003

    Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Corp. (2003)

    The district court denied Union Carbide's renewed motion for summary judgment on bulk supplier/sophisticated user grounds, leaving Conwed's subrogation claim against Union Carbide to proceed. Under Minnesota law, a supplier's reliance on…

  12. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · September 6, 2006

    Fernandez v. Union Carbide Corp. (2006)

    The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the final judgment entered on a jury verdict for Union Carbide Corporation, rejecting the plaintiff's challenges to the trial court's evidentiary rulings. A trial court acts within…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 18, 2013

    Strickland v. Union Carbide Corp. (2013)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment for Strickland's widow and children against Union Carbide, holding substantial evidence supported the jury's finding that exposure to Calidria contributed to his risk of peritoneal mesothelioma. Under…

  14. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · June 25, 2021

    Union Carbide Corp. v. Brannan (2021)

    The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's denial of Union Carbide's motion to dismiss, so Louise Brannan's personal injury claims for her late husband's estate could proceed in the second…

  15. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 24, 2019

    Rowland v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    The Delaware Superior Court granted Union Carbide's motion for summary judgment against Jane and Douglas Rowland because they could not show that the joint compound they used contained Union Carbide's asbestos. A plaintiff must…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 27, 2017

    Shaw v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    The magistrate judge recommended granting Union Carbide's unopposed motion for summary judgment against Ralph and Joan Shaw because Mr. Shaw did not identify a Union Carbide asbestos product. Under Connecticut law, a plaintiff must show…

  17. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · April 18, 2006

    Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Corp. (2006)

    The Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court's subrogation judgment for Conwed against Union Carbide in most respects, rejecting Union Carbide's collateral estoppel and damages challenges but correcting a double reduction and remanding to enter…

  18. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · July 27, 2016

    Font v. Union Carbide Corp. (2016)

    On remand from the Florida Supreme Court, the Third District reversed the judgment for Union Carbide after a jury verdict and remanded Count II (strict liability) for a new trial, because the trial court refused Font…

  19. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 28, 2012

    Union Carbide Corp. v. Synatzske (2012)

    The en banc court affirmed the MDL pretrial court's order denying Union Carbide's motion and renewed motion to dismiss, so the Emmites' asbestosis wrongful-death claims could go forward. Under Chapter 90's safety…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 22, 2016

    Bartolone v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2016)

    The court denied Union Carbide's motion for summary judgment in its entirety, so plaintiff's estate's claims against Union Carbide go forward to trial. A defendant cannot obtain summary judgment by pointing to gaps…