No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

178 results for “General Electric”, page 8 of 9

  1. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 9, 2009 · in the opinion

    Bourque v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2009)

    …Kuchler, Polk, Schell, etal., New Orleans, LA, for Defendants/Appellees, General Motors, Ford Motor Company. Court composed of JIMMIE C. PETERS, MARC T. AMY and MICHAEL G. SULLIVAN, Judges. AMY, Judge. Former employee and wife brought…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · February 12, 2025 · in the opinion

    Alford v. Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc. (2025)

    …Supreme Court in Halphen v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. ("Halphen I"): There is general agreement upon the most basic principles of strict tort products liability. In order to recover from a manufacturer, the plaintiff must prove…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana · November 6, 2017 · in the opinion

    Bordelon v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2017)

    …13-1. In general, courts have found plaintiffs not to be dilatory when the plaintiff amends his complaint "before any trial or pre-trial dates were scheduled and no significant activity beyond the pleading stage has…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · April 18, 2006 · in the opinion

    Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Corp. (2006)

    …Conwed and Union Carbide at fault for causing injuries to six of those employees, and awarded common law damages, including general disability and loss of future earning capacity. In accordance with Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals…

  5. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 28, 2012 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corp. v. Synatzske (2012)

    …effect, it cannot be granted thereafter. A like general rule is that if a right to recover depends entirely upon a statute, its repeal deprives the court of jurisdiction over the subject matter. 135 Tex. 95…

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 22, 2016 · in the opinion

    Bartolone v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2016)

    …a Union Carbide product or provide a "scientific expression" of an exposure level. Dr. Moline cannot establish general or specific causation, defendant argues, where the product cannot be identified. PLAINTIFF'S ARGUMENTS Plaintiff argues that Campanella…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 16, 2010 · in the opinion

    Stewart v. Union Carbide Corporation (2010)

    …by asbestos, that medical tests showed that there were asbestos fibers in his lungs, that such fibers are not found in the general population, and that he had had a significant exposure to asbestos. Based on…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 17, 2013 · in the opinion

    Logan v. AP Moller-Maersk, Inc. (2013)

    …warn Mr. Logan of the dangers associated with Calidria because it provided adequate warnings to GP. Plaintiffs submit that apart from special orders and test shipments which were not available to the general public, all asbestos…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana · July 14, 2014 · in the opinion

    Davidson v. Georgia Pacific LLC (2014)

    …s testimony is reliable, including testing and testability, peer review and publication, evaluation of known rates of error, and general acceptance within the scientific community. See Daubert, 509 U.S. at 593-94, 113 S.Ct…

  10. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 23, 2020 · in the opinion

    Bagwell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2020)

    …art. 1813(E) provides: "When the answers \[to interrogatories\] are inconsistent with each other and one or more is likewise inconsistent with the general verdict, the count shall not direct the entry of judgment but may…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 17, 2016 · in the opinion

    Jackson v. 84 Lumber Co. (2016)

    …(Union Carbide, Crane) Defendant's general motion to preclude regulatory materials and public health pronouncements regarding asbestos is denied as overly broad more properly an evidentiary issue for trial. The Court will consider the admissibility of…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 5, 2009 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Bondex Int'l (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2009)

    …address the standards pertaining to relation back, and then proceed to apply those standards to the case before us. Relation Back in General Relation back is governed by Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c) which provides…

  13. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · June 5, 2014 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Nix (2014)

    …known or potential rate of error; whether there are standards controlling the technique's operation; and whether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within a relevant scientific community. Id. at 37. The inquiry is flexible…

  14. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Knight (2015)

    …tested; whether it has been the subject of peer review; whether the theory has a known or potential error rate; and whether the theory has gained general acceptance in the scientific community. Daubert, 509 U.S…

  15. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Torres (2019)

    …439 S.W.3d 332, 352 (Tex. 2014). Appellants do not dispute general causation. That is, they do not dispute that asbestos is capable of causing mesothelioma. However, each appellant argues that Oscar failed to establish…

  16. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · June 30, 2022 · in the opinion

    Fowler v. Akzo Nobel Chemicals, Inc. (2022)

    …provides: There is no general rule as to whether one supplying a product for the use of others through an intermediary has a duty to warn the ultimate product user directly or may rely on the…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · December 21, 2011 · in the opinion

    Carey v. JP Bushnell Packing Supply Company (2011)

    …In deciding this issue, the Court may consider the pleadings and supporting affidavits. Parnas v. General Motors Corp., 879 F.Supp. 91, 92 (E.D.Mo.1995). Discussion Plaintiffs allege Plaintiff John Carey contracted mesothelioma as…

  18. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Ross v. Union Carbide Corporation (2009)

    …the parties also stated their intentions in broad but general terms: It is the intent and purpose of this agreement that at no time will the Releasees be called upon to pay any further sum or…

  19. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 22, 2011 · in the opinion

    Bozeman v. Union Carbide Corporation (2011)

    …Lovell factors as to this case, we see no reason to depart from the general rule that judicial decisions are to be applied retroactively unless otherwise specified in the decision. The principle of law considered in…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · February 2, 2016 · in the opinion

    Weis v. Dsm Copolymer, Inc. (2016)

    …at 7-8). DSM further notes that these duties were inherited by the Utilization and Disposal Service division of the General Services Administration from September 1961 through 1965 after the Federal Facilities Corporation was dissolved. (R…