No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

26 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · September 28, 2020

    Gibbs v. 84 Lumber Company (2020)

    … Design Defect; Sophisticated User and Intermediary Defenses; Choice of Law Worksites: General Electric Large Steam Turbine Division; Deforest Company; home renovations with his father; General Plumbing job sites laborer, plumber, and shade tree mechanic Deforest Company…

  2. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 20, 2012 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Fields (2012)

    …and Doyle, P. J., concur. \[1\] We note that this Court granted General Electric Company's motion to withdraw its appeal from Case No. A11A2025. \[2\] OCGA § 51-12-33 (d) provides as follows: (d) (1…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 16, 2014 · in the opinion

    Sherin v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. (2014)

    …CertainTeed Corporation, Selby, Battersby & Company, Foster Wheeler Corporation, Pfizer Corporation, Schneider Electric USA, Inc., General Electric Company, The Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Conwed Corporation, CBS Corporation, John Crane-Houdaille Inc…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)

    …The court explained that the employer was a "sophisticated organization" and it did not have to be "told that gasoline is volatile and that sparks from an electrical connection or friction can cause ignition." (Ibid.) Subsequently…

  5. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 24, 2019

    Rowland v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …Worksites: home renovation projects; Plastolite; General Motors homeowner assisting with home renovation clean-up home renovation projects 1972-1976; launderer of her husband's work clothing Plastolite; launderer of her father's work clothing General Motors

  6. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 11, 2019

    Bagwell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2019)

    …were not at fault and the trial court's evidence and instruction rulings, but raised the survival-action general damages against RMC Holdings, increasing the total award from $1,265,000 to $1,498,333.34…

  7. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · September 6, 2006

    Fernandez v. Union Carbide Corp. (2006)

    …raising evidence issues. At trial, medical records from his general physician's chart surfaced that neither side had seen before, including a pulmonologist's report. The trial court admitted that report but excluded handwritten notes of…

  8. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 4, 2011

    Robertson v. Doug Ashy Building Materials, Inc. (2011)

    …at issue, and circumstantial evidence that a manufacturer bought the supplier's asbestos can create a fact question on exposure. A raw-asbestos supplier also owes the general duty of reasonable care. Causation; Product Identification; Expert…

  9. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 26, 2021

    Fowler v. Akzo Nobel Chemicals, Inc. (2021)

    …be told this. In multi-defendant asbestos cases, medical causation instructions must include the frequency, regularity and proximity test, not just a general proximate cause charge. Causation; Product Identification; Failure to Warn; Design Defect; Sophisticated User…

  10. Court case · Utah Court of Appeals · April 4, 2013 · in the opinion

    Riggs v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2013)

    …P.2d 629, 634 (Utah 1995) ("The general rule regarding statutes of limitations is that the limitation period begins to run [\67] when the last event necessary to complete the cause of action occurs."). In other…

  11. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · December 29, 2010 · in the opinion

    Griffin v. Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust (2010)

    …in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party—here, plaintiff—and draw all reasonable inferences in plaintiff's favor. Jones v. General Motors Corp., 325 Or 404, 408, 939 P2d 608 (1997). Plaintiff worked as…

  12. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · March 2, 2021 · in the opinion

    Neely EX rel. Estate OF Goehring v. Union Carbide Corporation (2021)

    …manufactured, or marketed by Union Carbide were a substantial factor in causing Janet's mesothelioma. Union Carbide does not raise a general causation challenge. As the parties acknowledge, the proper framework for analysis of specific causation…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp. (2017)

    …702(c) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, nor do they satisfy the Daubert factors, including "testability," "peer review," and "general acceptance" within the "relevant scientific community," Bresler, 855 F.3d at 195. On the contrary…

  14. Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 29, 2015 · in the opinion

    Aubin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2015)

    …jury instructions pertaining to the duty to warn. Aubin requested the trial court to include a general instruction that Union Carbide had the duty to warn the end user, while Union Carbide asserted that it was…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · February 12, 2025 · in the opinion

    Alford v. Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc. (2025)

    …Supreme Court in Halphen v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. ("Halphen I"): There is general agreement upon the most basic principles of strict tort products liability. In order to recover from a manufacturer, the plaintiff must prove…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana · November 6, 2017 · in the opinion

    Bordelon v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2017)

    …13-1. In general, courts have found plaintiffs not to be dilatory when the plaintiff amends his complaint "before any trial or pre-trial dates were scheduled and no significant activity beyond the pleading stage has…

  17. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · April 18, 2006 · in the opinion

    Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Corp. (2006)

    …Conwed and Union Carbide at fault for causing injuries to six of those employees, and awarded common law damages, including general disability and loss of future earning capacity. In accordance with Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals…

  18. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 22, 2016 · in the opinion

    Bartolone v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2016)

    …a Union Carbide product or provide a "scientific expression" of an exposure level. Dr. Moline cannot establish general or specific causation, defendant argues, where the product cannot be identified. PLAINTIFF'S ARGUMENTS Plaintiff argues that Campanella…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 16, 2010 · in the opinion

    Stewart v. Union Carbide Corporation (2010)

    …by asbestos, that medical tests showed that there were asbestos fibers in his lungs, that such fibers are not found in the general population, and that he had had a significant exposure to asbestos. Based on…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 17, 2013 · in the opinion

    Logan v. AP Moller-Maersk, Inc. (2013)

    …warn Mr. Logan of the dangers associated with Calidria because it provided adequate warnings to GP. Plaintiffs submit that apart from special orders and test shipments which were not available to the general public, all asbestos…