No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

11 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 17, 2007

    Slaughter v. Union Carbide Corp. (2007)

    Ronald and Edna Slaughter sued 39 manufacturers and distributors of asbestos-containing products in Los Angeles County. Edna had been diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2006 and died in December of that year. They alleged she was exposed while they…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · March 19, 2019

    Mestas v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    Richard Mestas, Sr. and Lori Ann Muse sued more than two dozen companies in Colorado state court. Mestas has mesothelioma, and Muse seeks damages for loss of consortium. They allege that his father carried asbestos home on his clothing from 1953 to…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · November 20, 2019

    Mosher v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    The magistrate judge recommended granting Air & Liquid Systems Corporation's (successor to Buffalo Pumps) motion for summary judgment against plaintiffs Kent and Cathy Mosher because the evidence did not show its pump was a substantial factor…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · November 19, 2019

    Mosher v. ABB (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …Pfizer, Siemens, Union Carbide and Warren Pumps) against plaintiffs Kent and Cathy Mosher, who did not respond to the motions. Under maritime law and Colorado law, a plaintiff must show exposure to each defendant's asbestos…

  5. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2016

    Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2016)

    Vernon Rublee died of mesothelioma in 2015. He had worked as a machinist at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard from 1965 to 1980, where other workers mixed and applied asbestos-containing refractory products called Insulag and Panelag around the steam…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · January 7, 2022 · in the opinion

    Gorton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    …upon the death is a "new claim" separate and distinct from claims asserted as survival actions. See e.g., I. Horst et al. v. Union Carbide Corp., etal., No. 15CV1903, 2017 WL 11657237, at [\5] (Pa…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion

    Evans v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …1988). The defense is applicable to both design defect and failure to warn claims. See, e.g., MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corp., Civil Action No. 13-831-SLR-CJB, 2013 WL 6571808, at [\3] (D. Del…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion

    Faddish v. Buffalo Pumps (2012)

    …See e.g. McConnell v. Union Carbide Corp., 937 So.2d 148 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)(carpenter who contracted asbestosis from inhalation of asbestos fibers during use of joint compound incorporating processed asbestos was entitled to…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · September 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)

    …citations omitted). \[3\] District courts in this Circuit have followed Ebrahimi's lead on this point. See, e.g., Sperry Associates Federal Credit Union v. Space Coast Credit Union, 2012 WL 4762128, [\2] (M.D. Fla…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 10, 2019 · in the opinion

    Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    SHERRI L. DEEM, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of THOMAS A. DEEM, deceased, Plaintiff, v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, etal., Defendants. Case No. C17-5965 BHS. June 10, 2019. United States District Court…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · May 13, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …1174 (9th Cir. 2016), "did not reflect a uniquely maritime rule but instead was based on settled common-law principles described in the Restatement." See Stephens v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 935 F.3d 852…