No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

980 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 10 of 49

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 13, 2012 · in the opinion

    Leonard v. John Crane, Inc. (2012)

    …decades can pass between the first asbestos exposure and development of cancerous mesothelioma tumors. (Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520 \[66 Cal.Rptr.2d 438, 941 P.2d 71\] (Buttram).)\[5…

  2. Court case · California Supreme Court · January 12, 2012 · in the opinion

    O'neil v. Crane Co. (2012)

    …General Principles (8) "Generally speaking, manufacturers have a duty to warn consumers about the hazards inherent in their products. (Anderson \[v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.\], supra, 53 Cal.3d at p. 1003.) The requirement's purpose…

  3. Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · April 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Kinseth v. WEIL-McLAIN Company (2017)

    …recovery under the statute of repose, as the products were permanent additions to real property. See Buttz v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 557 N.W.2d 90, 91 (Iowa 1996). Therefore, we reverse the district court…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …in a manner that could not reasonably be foreseen by the defendant" bars recovery where such misuse proximately caused the injury. Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 721 n.14 (4th Cir…

  5. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 10, 2014 · in the opinion

    White v. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana (2014)

    …So.2d 1058, writ denied, 07-2042 (La.12/14/07), 970 So.2d 534) and $3 million (Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 03-0248 (La. App. 1st Cir.4/2/04), 878 So.2d…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 11, 2020 · in the opinion

    Booker v. Imerys Talc America, Inc. (2020)

    …included in the verdict form because they bear strict liability for his injuries. (See Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1187-1191 \[strict products liability applies to suppliers of raw…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 27, 2010 · in the opinion

    Saller v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. (2010)

    …Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 472 (Sparks).) Products liability may be premised upon a theory of design defect, manufacturing defect, or failure to warn. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. …

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · November 7, 2014 · in the opinion

    Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)

    …a large number of Powell valves at the refinery. \[4\] See, e.g., Haislip v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 86 F.3d 1150, at [\2] (4th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (unpublished) (applying Lohrmann to North Carolina…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 28, 2022 · in the opinion

    Sampey v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2022)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  10. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2018 · in the opinion

    Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2018)

    …is what the Court of Appeals has "termed a \bystander,' in that he did not work directly with the asbestos products but was in the vicinity of where such products were used." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…

  11. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · March 6, 2009 · in the opinion

    Cardinal Industrial Insulation Co., Inc. v. Norris (2009)

    …respect to negligence. Inclusion of Rohm & Haas in the apportionment instruction. Norris argues that the trial court committed reversible error by including Rohm & Haas in the apportionment instruction. We disagree. In Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · January 26, 2022 · in the opinion

    Barkley v. 4520 Corp., Inc. (2022)

    …has held that a plaintiff must "prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product containing asbestos in order to hold \[the defendant\] liable." Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  13. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 2, 2008 · in the opinion

    Rando v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2008)

    …evidence, that he was exposed to asbestos from the defendant's conduct and that he received an injury that was substantially caused by that exposure. See Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 2004-1589, p. 4…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 2016 · in the opinion

    Rondon v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2016)

    …is imposed for three types of product defects: manufacturing defects, design defects, and warning defects. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549\] (Anderson).…

  15. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 5, 2014 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Airco Welders Supply (2014)

    …Inc., 799 A.2d 71, 86 (Pa.Super.2002) (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 729 A.2d 614, 622-23 (Pa.Super.1999)) ("In asbestos litigation, evidence is sufficient to establish product identity where…

  16. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · June 13, 2013 · in the opinion

    Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)

    …289 P.3d at 195; see Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 510 N.W.2d 854, 861 (Iowa 1994) (finding that "it is not necessary and indeed may be impossible to establish exactly how much…

  17. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 15, 2011 · in the opinion

    Rodarmel v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2011)

    …McClure, the plaintiffs presented evidence, and the jury was entitled to find, that four asbestos companies (Owens Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Owens-Illinois, UNARCO, and Johns-Manville) all had engaged in the same sorts of wrongful conduct…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014)

    …supra, 205 Cal.App.4th at p. 88; Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1668 \[57 Cal.Rptr.2d 525\]), and we have no cause to address them here. While…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 28, 2017 · in the opinion

    Sandoval v. American Appliance Manufacturing Corp. (2017)

    …We disagree. The purpose of punitive damages is "to punish wrongdoing and deter future misconduct by either the defendant or other potential wrongdoers." (Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1658…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 8, 2010 · in the opinion

    Reaser v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)

    …the forum non conveniens motion can be granted. In that regard, Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 (Hansen) is instructive. Hansen was an asbestos case with 200 named defendants. (Id…