848 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 16 of 43
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion
Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)
…Feb. 28, 2012); Whiting v. CBS Corp., 982 N.E.2d 1224, at [\1] (Mass. App. Ct. 2013); Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, 703 A.2d 1315, 1332 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1998); Rumery v. Garlock…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · January 27, 2009 · in the opinion
Martin v. Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company (2009)
…II. ANALYSIS A. Standard of Review As this is a diversity action, Kentucky substantive law applies. Gahafer v. Ford Motor Co., 328 F.3d 859, 861 (6th Cir. 2003). Procedurally, federal standards for summary judgment govern…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · December 15, 2014 · in the opinion
Comardelle v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Company (2014)
…the states do not conflict \[on the relevant issue\], then no choice-of-law analysis is necessary.'" Schneider Nat'l Transp. v. Ford Motor Co., 280 F.3d 532, 536 (5th Cir. 2002) (quoting W.R…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2021 · in the opinion
Pizarro v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company (2021)
…formulated. These inferences cannot be based merely on speculation, but they may be established by circumstantial evidence, in accordance with ordinary standards of proof. Romo v. Ford Motor Co., 99 Cal.App. 4th 1115, 1141 (2002)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 5, 2015 · in the opinion
Comardelle v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Company (2015)
…similar expert causation testimony based on the "every exposure" theory. First, in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., the district court excluded Dr. Hammar's opinion that a plaintiff's exposure to brake dust caused his mesothelioma…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 24, 2017 · in the opinion
Sheppard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (2017)
…E.D. La. July 18, 2014) (applying test); In re Ford Motor Co. Vehicle Paint Litig., 1997 WL 539665, at [\3] (same). The Court finds that Sheppard has once again failed to plead the "who, what…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · December 16, 2015 · in the opinion
In re All Matters Related TO North American Refractories Company (2015)
…g., Liberty Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 562 F.3d 553, 557 (3d Cir. 2009) ("We have long held that an injury measured in solely monetary terms cannot constitute irreparable harm."). On its face…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · May 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Leren v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2019)
…Id. at 452. \[22\] Id. \[23\] Id. \[24\] Id. at 452-53. \[25\] Id. at 453. \[26\] Id. at 456 (quoting Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co., 61 Cal. 2d 256, 391 P.2d 168, 37 Cal…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · January 29, 2021 · in the opinion
Hayes v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2021)
…our Supreme Court cautions against "instructions getting into evidentiary matters, subquestions which better practice suggests should be omitted from the instructions and left to the lawyers to flesh out in closing arguments." Ford Motor Co. v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · February 28, 2014 · in the opinion
Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2014)
…v. A-C Prods. Liab. Trust, 424 F.3d 488, 492-93 (6th Cir. 2005); Smith v. Ford Motor Co., No. 2:08-cv-630, 2013 WL 214378, at [\1]-3 (D. Utah Jan. 18, 2014)…
-
Court case · Maryland Appellate Court · February 8, 2024 · in the opinion
Basil-Flippen v. General Electric Company (2024)
…it is merely incorporated into something larger, the strict liability will be found to carry through to the ultimate user or consumer," rather than to the assembler. Id. In Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, 119 Md…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · July 21, 2017 · in the opinion
Haskins v. 3M Company (2017)
…later afflicted with mesothelioma, contributed to the formation of the disease." Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 2013 WL 214378, at [\1] (D. Utah Jan. 18, 2013); see also Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F. Supp…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · September 28, 2020 · in the opinion
Gibbs v. 84 Lumber Company (2020)
…238, 242 (4th Cir. 1971) (finding that the duty-to-warn arises when the user may not realize the potential danger of a product))); see Watson v. Ford Motor Co., 389 S.C. 434, 444, 699…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 21, 2020 · in the opinion
Brandt v. Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. (2020)
…regularity, and proximity such that a fact-finder may infer that the plaintiff's exposure was a substantial factor in causing her harm. Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1052-53 (Pa. 2016…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · September 2, 2015 · in the opinion
Bell v. Abb Group, Inc. (2015)
…806 (7th Cir. 2013) (Daubert "remains the gold standard for evaluating the reliability of expert testimony."). The Seventh Circuit's Opinion in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2000) provides the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 21, 2016 · in the opinion
Casey v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. Inc. (2016)
…701.) Accordingly, we conclude excluding reference to the first jury's determination that Kaiser Gypsum was 3.5 percent at fault did not prejudice Kaiser Gypsum. White v. Ford Motor Co. (9th Cir. 2007) 500 F…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 21, 2021 · in the opinion
United States Fidelity and Guaranty v. Ulbricht (2021)
…F/V St. Patrick, 816 F.2d 1345, 1352 (9th Cir. 1987) (quoting Polk v. Ford Motor Co., 529 F.2d 259, 271 (8th Cir. 1976)), opinion modified on reh'g, 866 F.2d 318 (9th…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 28, 2000 · in the opinion
Hollingsworth v. Connor (2000)
…uniform, but an "injury" does not arise until symptoms are manifested while the harm for a fatal and irreversible "disease" arises as soon as the cellular change develops. Our recent decisions in Ford \[Motor Co. v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · February 26, 2014 · in the opinion
Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Co. (2014)
…a substantial factor causing an injury. Id., 177 Ill.Dec. 379, 603 N.E.2d at 455-57. Cf. Ford Motor [\920] Co. v. Boomer, 285 Va. 141, 736 S.E.2d 724, 729-30 (2013)…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion
Coogan v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc. (2020)
…We agree with the Coogans. a. Legal Principles In Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., the Supreme Court adopted the rule of strict liability for product manufacturers stated in § 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (Am…