980 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 16 of 49
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · August 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Williams v. Placid Oil Company (2017)
…Rubber & Gasket settled with Plaintiffs does not meet Ingersoll-Rand's burden of proof As noted by the trial court, the appellate court in Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 03-248, p.14 (La.App…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · September 30, 2021 · in the opinion
Papineau v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2021)
…supported by evidence that the defendant acted with "flagrant indifference" or "engaged in misrepresentation, deceit or concealment of a known fact with the intention of causing injury" to the plaintiff. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Golightly…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 5, 2018 · in the opinion
McKinney v. Hobart Bros. Co. (2018)
…along on every draft of air (and here we are looking at the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, as we must do (see McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 188 Ill. 2d 102…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 23, 2010 · in the opinion
Wilson v. Certainteed Corporation (2010)
…there is no causation. (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 655 (Dumin).) "Plaintiffs may prove causation in an asbestos case by demonstrating that the plaintiff's or decedent's exposure…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · July 7, 2023 · in the opinion
Williams v. Schneider Electric USA, Inc. (2023)
…of the trial court's suggestion that a jury could apportion work-related and non-work-related injuries, if appropriate. Id. at [\4]-5 (citing Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Parrish, 58 S.W.3d 467…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 20, 2007 · in the opinion
Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2007)
…negligence theory) unless the manufacturer had actual or constructive knowledge of the potential hazard. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1002-1003.) Unocal contends the notion of what constitutes a "hazard…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 21, 2016 · in the opinion
Baeza v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2016)
…employer had no liability for plaintiff's injuries beyond payment of workers' compensation benefits\]; Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1198 \[applied Proposition 51 to strict liability asbestos case\].) Defendant…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · January 7, 2022 · in the opinion
Data v. Joy Global Underground Mining (2022)
…of such a nature as to raise a reasonable inference that \[s\]he inhaled asbestos fibers that emanated from it.'" Wilson, 807 A.2d at 923 (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 1999 Pa. Super…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 13, 2023 · in the opinion
King v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2023)
…When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · Georgia Supreme Court · November 8, 2004 · in the opinion
John Crane, Inc. v. Jones (2004)
…Cause in Actions of Tort," 25 Harv. L.Rev. 103 (1911). See Jeter v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 716 A.2d 633, 636(n.2) (Pa.Super 1998), citing Prosser & Keeton, On the Law of Torts…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 14, 2022 · in the opinion
Roussell v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2022)
…When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 28, 2008 · in the opinion
McCann v. Foster Wheeler (2008)
…law, McCann's claim did not accrue until he was diagnosed with mesothelioma and is not barred by the lapse of time. (See Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 531, fn…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · December 29, 2016 · in the opinion
In re Asbestos Litigation Charlevoix v. CBS Corporation (2016)
…products, "in the scope of \[the plaintiffs\] entire work history," should be considered in determining whether defendant's conduct was a substantial contributing factor. Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 571N.W.2d530, 533 (Mich. Ct…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 17, 2023 · in the opinion
Crossland v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2023)
…When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · December 11, 2008 · in the opinion
Braaten v. Saberhagen Holdings (2008)
…product which because of a defect or unsafe use is itself unsafe); Fricke v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 618 So.2d 473 (La.Ct.App. 1993) (manufacturer is not liable for inadequate warnings regarding a product…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · September 8, 1993 · in the opinion
Keene Corp. v. Rogers (1993)
…can cause serious damage when injected, but which is the only known way to cure the deadly disease. \[6\] An attorney representing Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation actually made the objection, but the parties agreed at trial…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 25, 2009 · in the opinion
Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc. (2009)
…548, 568, fn. 5 \[34 Cal.Rptr.2d 607, 882 P.2d 298\]; Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 994 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549\] (Anderson); Daly v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · January 6, 2016 · in the opinion
Ahnert v. Employers Insurance Company OF Wausau (2016)
…before the discovery deadline of February 27, 2015. Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 230 W is. 2d 212, 244 (1999) and the doctrines of preclusion allow plaintiff to bring a second case to the extent…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 29, 2009 · in the opinion
Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Saville (2009)
…to the Cross-Defendants' products than to Scapa's products, and that the jury's verdict is therefore inconsistent and warrants a JNOV.\[5\] As the Court of Appeals explained in Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · May 16, 2013 · in the opinion
Scearce v. 3M Company (2013)
…federal defense; and 4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d Cir. 1998…