Search

848 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 17 of 43

1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · June 12, 2020 · in the opinion

   Curtin v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co. (2020)

   …issue, and the Eleventh Circuit has held that "the loss of a valid statute of limitations defense \[does not\] constitute a bar to a dismissal without prejudice." McCants v. Ford Motor Co., 781 F.2d 855…

2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 25, 2009 · in the opinion

   Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc. (2009)

   …2001) 26 Cal.4th 465, 478-479 \[110 Cal.Rptr.2d 370, 28 P.3d 116\], quoting Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256, 261 \[37 Cal.Rptr. 896, 391 P.2d 168…

3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion

   Morgan v. JM Manufacturing Co., Inc. (2021)

   …mind. Morgan's argument relies on and quotes from Romo v. Ford Motor Co. (2002) 99 Cal.App.4th 1115 \[122 Cal.Rptr.2d 139\] (Romo), vacated on other grounds in Ford Motor Co. v. Romo…

4. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · June 2, 2022 · in the opinion

   English v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2022)

   …Shulton pursuant to CPLR 302(a)(1), which applies by its terms, and that the exercise of jurisdiction over Shulton is also compatible with due process (see Ford Motor Co. v Montana Eighth Judicial Dist. Court…

5. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · May 4, 2006 · in the opinion

   Robinson v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. (2006)

   …893 S.W.2d at 518. A. The Applicable Law. A special law is defined as one "\limited to a particular class of persons distinguished by some characteristic other than geography.'" Ford Motor Co. v. Sheldon…

6. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · March 4, 2009 · in the opinion

   Mason v. Mt. St. Joseph, Inc. (2009)

   …474, 155 P.3d 52 (2007); Simonsen v. Ford Motor Co., 196 Or.App. 460, 102 P.3d 710 (2004) (liberal construction of operative pleading in assessing sufficiency of claims under applicable statute of limitations). In…

7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 16, 2011 · in the opinion

   Anderson v. Salmon Bay and Gravel Co. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2011)

   …Schiff, 602 F.3d 152, 172 (3d Cir. April 7, 2010) (quoting Pineda v. Ford Motor Co., 502 F.3d 237, 243-44 (3d Cir. 2008)). Defendant has not challenged the qualification of Plaintiffs' experts, so…

8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · September 28, 2011 · in the opinion

   Vickroy v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2011)

   …Corp.; Chrysler, LLC; Econolite Traffic Engineering & Maintenance, Inc.; Flexo Supply Co., d/b/a Stovey Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Foster Wheeler Energy Corp.; Garlock, Inc.; Genuine Parts Co.; Georgia Pacific Corp.; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.; Honeywell…

9. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 16, 2016 · in the opinion

   Hassell v. The Budd Co. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Lit.(no. VI), 2016)

   …SBRMCOA, LLC v. Bayside Resort, Inc., 707 F.3d 267, 272-73 (3d Cir.2013) (quoting Ford Motor Co. v. Summit Motor Prods., Inc., 930 F.2d 277, 284-85 (3d Cir. 1991)). In this case…

10. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 17, 2024 · in the opinion

    Constantine v. Lenox Instrument Co., Inc. (2024)

    …establish proximate \[or legal\] causation, a plaintiff must adduce evidence to show that the defendant's act was a substantial factor in bringing about the plaintiff's harm." Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 637 Pa. 625…

11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 10, 1985 · in the opinion

    Kaminski v. Western MacArthur Co. (1985)

    …v. IRM Corporation (1985) 38 Cal.3d 454 \[213 Cal. Rptr. 213, 698 P.2d 116\]; Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256 \[37 Cal. Rptr. 896, 391 P.2d 168\]; Barth v…

12. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 31, 1990 · in the opinion

    Celotex Corp. v. Tate (1990)

    …Manufacturing Company products.\[1\] When considering a "no evidence," "insufficient evidence," or "against the great weight and preponderance" point of error, we will follow the well-established test set forth in Pool v. Ford Motor Co…

13. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 9, 2017 · in the opinion

    Startley v. Welco Mfg. Co. (2017)

    …Appeals recently decided a case in which a brake worker had inhaled asbestos dust from installing the brake products of six different manufacturers. Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co., 91 S.W.3d 387, 393 (Tex.App…

14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 8, 2018 · in the opinion

    Alfaro v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2018)

    …the determination of whether these fees were reasonably necessary, are issues left to the discretion of the trial court." (Adams v. Ford Motor Co. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 1475, 1484 \[132 Cal.Rptr.3d 424…

15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 11, 2002 · in the opinion

    Sledz v. Flintkote Co. (2002)

    …applicable under state law. For example, in Sasser v. Ford Motor Co., 126 F.Supp.2d 1333 (M.D.Ala.2001), the plaintiff filed a complaint in state court against nondiverse defendants on July 31, 1998…

16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · November 7, 1983 · in the opinion

    Donovan v. Oil, Chem., and Atom. Workers Intern. (1983)

    …Pierce Utilities Auth. v. FERC, 459 U.S. 1156, 103 S.Ct. 800, 74 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1983); Ford Motor Credit v. Milhollin, 444 U.S. 555, 556, 100 S.Ct. 790, 792, 63 L…

17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · November 7, 2014 · in the opinion

    Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)

    …cases applying a "modified or adjusted" Lohrmann test in mesothelioma cases and rejecting them as inconsistent with a prediction that the North Carolina Supreme Court would adopt the Lohrmann test); see also Ford Motor Co. v…

18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 6, 2016 · in the opinion

    Bell v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2016)

    The rules of evidence do not permit an expert to testify that "\[j\]ust because we cannot rule anything out" that "we can rule everything in." Smith v. Ford Motor Co., No. 08-630, 2013 WL…

19. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 1, 1988 · in the opinion

    H & H Plumbing Co. v. Indus. Comm'n (1988)

    …(1976), 39 Ill. App.3d 59, 65-66, 349 N.E.2d 616, 621; see Pearson v. Ford Motor Co. (1975), 32 Ill. App.3d 188, 191, 336 N.E. 2d 528, 530.) In the case…

20. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 3, 2010 · in the opinion

    Dean v. Bur. OF Workers'comp. (2010)

    …(2008), 176 Ohio App.3d 453, 458, 892 N.E.2d 493, 497, 2008-Ohio-2377 at ¶ 17 Snyder v. Ford Motor Co., Third Dist. No. 1-05-41, 2005-Ohio-6415, ¶ 31. As a prerequisite…