No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

495 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 18 of 25

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · April 12, 2019 · in the opinion

    Barrett v. AW Chesterton Co. (2019)

    …Decking Inc., formerly known as Selby, Battersby & Co., Defendant, represented by F. Ford Loker, Jr., Miles and Stockbridge PC. The William Powell Company, Defendant, represented by Vincent J. Palmiotto, Clyde & Co. US LLP. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 8, 2010 · in the opinion

    Peter & Elpis Constantinides v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2010)

    …Argument, doc. no. 141, March 2, 2010 at 93). Mr. Constantinides testified that he occasionally repaired pumps and motors by removing and replacing gaskets and bearings. (Pl. Video Dep., doc. no. 125-2, 56-59). Mr…

  3. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 5, 2018 · in the opinion

    McKinney v. Hobart Bros. Co. (2018)

    …showing not only that Frank himself was qualified but also that his reliance on Dement's work was (1) customary in Frank's field and (2) reasonable. See Connelly v. General Motors Corp., 184 Ill. App…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 11, 2021

    Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2021)

    The court granted Ford Motor Co.'s motions for summary judgment on causation and punitive damages, dismissing the Dickens plaintiffs' claims against Ford with prejudice. Under Mississippi's frequency, regularity and proximity test with product identification…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · April 4, 2016 · in the opinion

    Smith v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2016)

    …D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2014), reconsidered on other grounds sub nom. Yates v. Ford Motor Co., No. 5:12-CV-752-FL, 2015 WL 9222834 (Dec. 17, 2015).\[2\] Even if Ms. Smith could show…

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · January 28, 2025 · in the opinion

    Beagan v. Akebono Brake Corp. (2025)

    …it was required, based on interstate federalism concerns embodied in the due process clause, to divest itself of its power to render a judgment over them in this case (see Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · July 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)

    Ford Motor Co., 99 Cal.App.4th 1115, 1141, 122 Cal.Rptr.2d 139 (2002) ("It is difficult to imagine how corporate malice could be shown in the case of a large corporation except by piecing…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · November 19, 2015 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. AC&S, Inc. (2015)

    …it is more likely than not" that plaintiff's alleged exposure to asbestos from defendant's product "occurred prior to the development" of his illness and "was sufficient to cause" his illness. Ford Motor Co. v…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2018 · in the opinion

    Trapp v. CertainTEED Corporation (2018)

    …to individuals who lived or worked some distance away from its plant, citing to Campbell v. Ford Motor Co. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 15 (Campbell), a case that was later overruled by Kesner v. Superior…

  10. Court case · Indiana Supreme Court · March 25, 2003 · in the opinion

    AlliedSignal, Inc. v. Herring (2003)

    …Cincinnati, OH, Attorney for Navistar Transportation Corp. Kenneth T. Roberts, Tasha R. Roberts, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Ford Motor Co. [\1092] Susan E. Mehringer, Lisa Dillman, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for ACandS, Inc. James E. Rocap, Jr…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 30, 2004 · in the opinion

    Cadlo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2004)

    …776, 59 Cal.Rptr.2d 322.) Because Owens-Illinois was not "an integral part of the overall producing and marketing enterprise" of OCF's Kaylo (Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256, 262…

  12. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 19, 2008 · in the opinion

    Wright v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2008)

    …Corp., Chrysler Corp., Crane Co., Crane Packing, Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., Ford Motor Co., Foster Wheeler Corp., Garlock, Inc., General Electric Co., General Motors Corp., Goulds Pumps, Inc., Green Tweed & Co., Inc., Hopeman Brothers, Inc.…

  13. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · July 22, 2015 · in the opinion

    Baumgartner v. American Standard, Inc. (2015)

    …C. § 2315.21(B). Here, there is clearly a conflict as to the assessment of punitive damages. See e.g., Dodson v. Ford Motor Co., 2006 WL 2642199, at [\2] (R.I. Super. Sept. 5, 2006…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 28, 1988 · in the opinion

    Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1988)

    …See Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1163 (4th Cir.1986) ("permissible inferences must ... be within the range of reasonable probability") (quoting Ford Motor Co. v. McDavid, 259 F.2d 261, 266 (4th…

  15. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · May 20, 1992 · in the opinion

    Baione v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1992)

    …1976). When a set of facts will support both a theory of common law negligence and strict liability, a plaintiff is entitled to proceed on either theory or both. Ford Motor Co. v. Hill, 404 So…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 9, 2009 · in the opinion

    Oxford v. Foster Wheeler LLC (2009)

    …instructions." (Hasson v. Ford Motor Co. (1977) 19 Cal.3d 530, 540 \[138 Cal.Rptr. 705, 564 P.2d 857\] (Hasson), overruled in part on other grounds in Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · October 24, 2019 · in the opinion

    Evans v. John Crane, Inc. (2019)

    …expert must testify about matters requiring scientific, technical or specialized knowledge; and (3) the expert's testimony must assist the trier of fact." Pineda v. Ford Motor Co., 520 F.3d 237, 244 (3d Cir. 2008)…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 28, 2017 · in the opinion

    Sandoval v. American Appliance Manufacturing Corp. (2017)

    …adjudication on the Sandovals' claims. AAMC requested summary judgment on two grounds. Relying on the holding in Campbell v. Ford Motor Co. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 15, 34 (Campbell), which our Supreme Court recently disapproved…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Evans v. Imo Industries, Inc. (2019)

    …by Captain Moore in forming his opinion regarding Navy warning requirements do not have the requisite "fit" to assist the trier of fact. See Oddi v. Ford Motor Co., 234 F.3d 136, 145 (3d Cir…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 17, 2015 · in the opinion

    Melendrez v. Ameron International Corporation (2015)

    …one of the many factors to be taken into consideration by the trial judge" in deciding reasonableness of section 998 offer\].) We find Adams v. Ford Motor Co. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 1475 (Adams) instructive…