No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

532 results for “General Electric”, page 19 of 27

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 28, 2017 · in the opinion

    Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2017)

    …asbestos that caused his lung cancer. However, Dr. Frank testified on this general causation factor and concluded that exposure to asbestos can cause lung cancer. Dr. Gelfand also testified that, based on the medical literature and…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · December 2, 2004 · in the opinion

    In re Combustion Engineering, Inc. (2004)

    …Insurance Company, successor to Insurance Company of North America); Pacific Employers Insurance Company; Central National Insurance Company of Omaha (solely with respect to policies issued through its managing general agent, Cravens, Dargan & Company, Pacific Coast), Appellants…

  3. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 22, 1994 · in the opinion

    Goss v. American Cyanamid Co. (1994)

    …as a salesperson to the American Cyanamid plant that there should be an inference raised that he sold them asbestos containing products inasmuch as they were available to customers of Madsen & Howell in a general sense…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · April 5, 2023 · in the opinion

    Gemaehlich v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)

    …and GRANTS the Gemaehlichs' motion to remand. "It is the general rule that an action may be removed from state court to federal court only if a federal district court would have original jurisdiction over the…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · December 2, 2004 · in the opinion

    Lustenring v. AC&S, Inc. (2004)

    …which were made with asbestos. Valid expert testimony indicated that such dust, raised from asbestos products and not just from industrial air in general, necessarily contains enough asbestos to cause mesothelioma. Defendant's factual disagreement with…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 22, 1991 · in the opinion

    Lilley v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1991)

    …asbestosis sufferers in general and specifically by a person with Mr. Lilley's type of symptoms. Id. at 41-46. Dr. Altschuler offered no testimony regarding Mr. Lilley's psychological profile nor the general psychological characteristics…

  7. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 17, 2015 · in the opinion

    Amato v. Bell & Gossett (2015)

    …of Pittsburgh, 409 Pa. 357, 186 A.2d 399 (1962), which it asserts stands for the general rule that "for the same injury, an injured party may have but one satisfaction." Id. at 402. However, Crane…

  8. Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · April 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Kinseth v. WEIL-McLAIN Company (2017)

    …Hellman, P.L.C., Waterloo, for plaintiffs-appellees/cross-appellants. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Richard E. Mull, Assistant Attorney General, for intervenor. Heard by Mullins, P.J., and Bower and McDonald, JJ. BOWER, Judge…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 2, 2016 · in the opinion

    Young v. 3M Company (2016)

    …2013 WL 7088637, at [\6] (allowing limited jurisdictional discovery to determine if the plaintiff's allegation that the defendant sold materials to a company doing business in North Carolina was sufficient to establish general jurisdiction). Therefore…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · August 18, 2014 · in the opinion

    Grande v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, Inc. (2014)

    …false representation; (4) intentional tort/intentional failure to warn; (5) premises/contractor liability; (6) general negligence; and (7) vicarious liability. (Id.) Plaintiff has since dismissed a number of Defendants from the above-captioned matter. Only Plaintiff…

  11. Court case · Massachusetts Appeals Court · February 14, 2013 · in the opinion

    Whiting v. CBS Corporation (2013)

    …by asbestos products manufactured or later supplied by the defendants, and have shown that the plaintiff \has no reasonable expectation of proving an essential element of \[her\] case.' Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp., 410 Mass. 706…

  12. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 3, 2014 · in the opinion

    Farrow v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2014)

    …Technologies, L.L.C. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Garlock, Inc.); General Motors Corporation (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Harrison Thermal System and Harrison Radiator); Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Hardie-Tynes…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 25, 2020 · in the opinion

    Vocciante v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)

    …Id. at ¶ 28) Accordingly, plaintiffs assert claims for strict liability, negligence, false representation, violation of the Jones Act, violation of general maritime law, loss of consortium, wrongful death, and seek, inter alia, punitive damages. (Id. at…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 2, 2009 · in the opinion

    Kofler v. AW Chesteron (2009)

    …Inc. ceased manufacturing asbestos-containing gasket material in 1969 and 1973 respectively. Goodyear's General Counsel asserts that Goodyear stopped manufacturing asbestos-containing gaskets before 1974. (Responses to Plaintiffs' First Standard Set of Interrogatories by G…

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 3, 2009 · in the opinion

    Beltrami v. AO Smith Water Prod. Co. (2009)

    …from a Gorman product. Gorman contends, based upon its reply papers which for the first time on this motion contains an affidavit of its Vice President and General Manager Mark Kreinbihl, sworn to June 18, 2009…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 9, 2009 · in the opinion

    Oxford v. Foster Wheeler LLC (2009)

    …unable to conclude that the jury's verdict was based on a finding of negligent failure to warn because the special verdict form is inconsistent.\[5\] [\715] The jury was given general negligence instructions BAJI Nos…

  17. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002 · in the opinion

    Crane, Inc. v. Scribner (2002)

    …time, can metastasize to other structures, including the diaphragm and the abdominal cavity. Although there is a background rate of mesothelioma in the general population that is not asbestos-related, it is very low. Dr. Samuel…

  18. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 14, 2013 · in the opinion

    Tobin v. Aerco Intl. (2013)

    …a seaman, Mr. Tobin stood watch on the bridge and deck, painted, and performed general repairs. He also visited the ship's engine room below deck where his coworkers performed work on pipes, valves, pumps, turbines…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    Petitpas v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    …1103.) Even assuming Dr. Horn is correct as to the cause of mesothelioma in general, plaintiffs had the burden to prove that exposure to asbestos-containing materials at Rossmoor was a substantial factor in contributing to…

  20. Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · June 23, 2009 · in the opinion

    Newinski v. John Crane, Inc. (2009)

    …1981) (citations omitted). An exception to the general rule of joint and several liability applies when there are "independent consecutive acts of negligence and it is reasonably possible to determine which injuries were caused by which…