No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

151 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 2 of 8

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 23, 2019

    Michel v. Ford Motor Co. (2019)

    …court granted Ford Motor Company's motion to dismiss only as to plaintiffs' wrongful death employer liability claim, which was dismissed with prejudice, and otherwise denied it, so plaintiffs' other wrongful death claims against Ford continue…

  2. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · November 22, 2016

    Rost v. Ford Motor Co. (2016)

    …affirmed the judgment for the Rost estates against Ford Motor Company, holding that the causation testimony was proper and that, although consolidation with two other cases was error, Ford showed no prejudice. An expert may tell…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 20, 2019

    Michel v. Ford Motor Co. (2019)

    …premises and employer liability claims against Ford, found strict products liability claims already pleaded, and said a continuance would cure prejudice to Ford. A party seeking to amend after the scheduling-order deadline must show good…

  4. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · January 31, 2019

    Knecht v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    The Delaware Superior Court denied Ford Motor Company's renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law, its alternative motion for a new trial, and its motion for a new trial or remittitur, leaving the…

  5. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 8, 1998

    Ford Motor v. Wood (1998)

    …of Special Appeals reversed the judgment for Mrs. Wood against Ford Motor Company for insufficient proof that her husband was exposed to Ford's brake and clutch products, and affirmed the judgment for the Grewe plaintiffs…

  6. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · March 3, 2020

    Knecht v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    On remand from the Delaware Supreme Court, the Superior Court denied Ford Motor Company's motion for a new trial or remittitur, leaving the $40.625 million compensatory verdict for Paula Knecht in place. A jury…

  7. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · November 27, 2018

    Juni v. Ford Motor Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …verdict against Ford Motor Company, so plaintiff Mary Juni lost and Ford won judgment as a matter of law. Viewing the evidence in plaintiff's favor, it was legally insufficient to establish that Ford's conduct…

  8. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 19, 2013

    Farrall v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2013)

    …plaintiff's motion for reargument, leaving in place its grant of summary judgment for Ford Motor Company on the failure to warn claim about asbestos-containing replacement parts. Under Delaware law, a manufacturer has no duty…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 25, 2021

    Putt v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2021)

    …a new trial on apportionment of fault among Ford, other automakers and brake pad makers/suppliers and on the amount of punitive damages. Where the jury found Ford's brake pads defective and a substantial factor…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 13, 2015

    Juni v. Ford Motor Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)

    The court granted Ford Motor Company's post-trial motion, set aside the jury verdict for plaintiffs Arthur and Mary Juni in its entirety, and directed judgment for Ford. Under the Court of Appeals' decisions in…

  11. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 24, 2002

    Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co. (2002)

    The court of appeals affirmed the take-nothing judgment for Ford, General Motors, Daimler Chrysler, Allied Signal, Borg-Warner and Uniroyal, holding the exclusion of plaintiff's experts was an abuse of discretion but harmless because…

  12. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · September 7, 2017

    Heaton v. Ford Motor Co. (2017)

    Paul Heaton, as executor of the estate of Robert Brawley, sued several companies, including McCord Corporation, alleging that Brawley's mesothelioma and death resulted from asbestos exposure. Against McCord, he claimed Brawley was exposed while repairing…

  13. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · August 28, 2024

    Day v. 3M Company Inc. (2024)

    …Island Superior Court denied summary judgment to Ford Motor Company and to Graybar Electric Company, so the estate's claims against both go forward, and it also denied Ford's motion for partial entry of separate…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 15, 2023

    Munna v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2023)

    Joseph Munna sued American Honda, many other vehicle and parts companies, and others over lung cancer he attributed to asbestos. This decision did not address liability. Munna asked the New York County Supreme Court to try…

  15. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · March 29, 2010

    Asbury v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)

    Carlie Asbury, diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2006, and her husband Thomas sued thirty defendants in Rhode Island Superior Court in 2007. They alleged she was exposed to asbestos in Iowa, Colorado and Wyoming. In Iowa she swept dust and debris in…

  16. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · March 24, 2022

    Marino v. Abex Corporation (2022)

    The Appellate Division affirmed the judgment for plaintiff Deborah Marino against Ford Motor Company, upholding the discovery sanctions; it found one hearsay ruling erroneous but harmless. A trial court may sanction a party for violating a…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · November 1, 2018

    Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair, Inc. (2018)

    The court granted Ford Motor Company's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' alternative-causation claims with prejudice and their fraud, concealment and aiding-and-abetting conspiracy claims without prejudice, and allowed the…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 25, 2019

    Johansen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    The magistrate judge recommended granting Ford Motor Company's summary judgment motion on the negligence, failure-to-warn and punitive damages claims, because Johansen's brake exposure was de minimis and Ford owed no duty to…

  19. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · February 28, 2017

    Mtr OF Nyc Asbestos Litig. (2017)

    The Appellate Division affirmed the judgment for Ford Motor Company, upholding the trial court's order setting aside the jury's verdict for plaintiff Mary Juni, and dismissed the appeal from the order as subsumed in…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas · December 21, 2018

    Thomas v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec LLC (2018)

    The court granted summary judgment to Ford, Honeywell and Abex on the breach of warranty claims and granted Abex's motion in part on market share liability, but denied summary judgment on all other claims, including…