34 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 2 of 2
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 22, 2011 · in the opinion
Sabol v. Allied Glove Corp. (2011)
…Company, Owens-Illinois, Inc., Plotkin Brothers Supply, Inc., Premier Refractories, Inc., Safety First Industries, Inc., and United States Steel Corporation, v. Carnegie Mellon University, General Motors Corporation, Genuine Parts Company, Lindberg, Melrath Supply and Gasket Company…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 9, 1991 · in the opinion
Wehmeier v. Unr Industries, Inc. (1991)
…Fetzer Co. v. Dile (9th Cir.1981), 643 F.2d 670; Smith v. Ford Motor Co. (10th Cir.1980), 626 F.2d 784.) In Scott, the lower court permitted plaintiff, through previous undisclosed witnesses, to advance…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · July 22, 2015 · in the opinion
Baumgartner v. American Standard, Inc. (2015)
…C. § 2315.21(B). Here, there is clearly a conflict as to the assessment of punitive damages. See e.g., Dodson v. Ford Motor Co., 2006 WL 2642199, at [\2] (R.I. Super. Sept. 5, 2006…
-
Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 30, 2015 · in the opinion
Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Knight (2015)
…and consequently cannot have an error rate."); Anderson v. Ford Motor Co., 950 F.Supp.2d 1217, 1224-1225 (D.Utah 2013) ("every exposure" opinion excluded under Daubert as not testable and having no known error…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 28, 2017 · in the opinion
Sandoval v. American Appliance Manufacturing Corp. (2017)
…adjudication on the Sandovals' claims. AAMC requested summary judgment on two grounds. Relying on the holding in Campbell v. Ford Motor Co. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 15, 34 (Campbell), which our Supreme Court recently disapproved…
-
Court case · Georgia Supreme Court · July 5, 2016 · in the opinion
Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Knight (2016)
…through use of expert testimony, a significant and sustained exposure in the plaintiff's history."). See also Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F.Supp.3d 841, 862 (E.D.N.C. 2015) (testimony inadmissible where…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Minton (2013)
…proceedings if he be so advised. \[1\] We have today rejected the substantial contributing factor analysis of proximate causation in cases tried under Virginia law when multiple sufficient causation is alleged. Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · October 15, 1987 · in the opinion
Lockwood v. AC & S, Inc. (1987)
…itself and the consumer's expectations. Davis, at 72. Thus, in Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wn.2d 208, 212-13, 683 P.2d 1097, 47 A.L.R.4th 609 (1984), we held that…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 26, 2010 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Bostic (2010)
…232 S.W.3d at 770 (quoting Union Pump Co. v. Allbritton, 898 S.W.2d 773, 775 (Tex. 1995)); see also Ford Motor Co. v. Ledesma, 242 S.W.3d 32, 46 (Tex. 2007). Thus…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 30, 2015 · in the opinion
Bryant v. General Motors Corp. (2015)
…husband contracted and died from an occupational disease as a result of an injurious exposure to asbestos in the course of and arising out of his employment. See Snyder v. Ford Motor Co., 3d Dist. No…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 19, 2016 · in the opinion
Hillyer v. Mine Safety Appliances Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2016)
…Cross Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. & Megan Trocki Mantzavinos, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C.. Mine Safety Appliances Company, Cross Defendant, represented by…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · April 4, 1996 · in the opinion
Simmons v. Pacor, Inc. (1996)
…under different circumstances, recovery should be allowed for other damages flowing from asymptomatic pleural thickening. Judge Del Sole also filed a concurring opinion in which Judge Ford Elliot joined. Judge Del Sole agreed that a person…
-
Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · June 1, 2018 · in the opinion
Kinseth v. Weil-McLain (2018)
…It is not about what the family needs, it is about sending a message to a company who you've evaluated how they spend some of their money, you've evaluated some of their actions with…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · August 7, 2018 · in the opinion
Mohn v. CBS Corporation (2018)
…N.W.2d 308. In Peter, we analyzed an asbestos claim that sought application of an exception to the protections of the statute of repose for "\[d\]amages that were sustained before April 29, 1994." Id., …