30 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 2 of 2
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · February 20, 1990 · in the opinion
Grispo v. Eagle-Picher Indus. (In re Joint E. & S. Dist. New York Asbestos Lit., 1990)
…worth undertaking at this time, we proceed to consider it. As the military contractor defense exists to promote a federal interest in military procurement, see Sanner v. Ford Motor Co., 144 N.J.Super. 1, 9…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · October 11, 1996 · in the opinion
ACandS Inc. v. Asner (1996)
…al. No. 92, Sept. Term 1995. October 11, 1996. Opinion Denying Reconsideration December 6, 1996. Court of Appeals of Maryland. [\252] B. Ford Davis (Dwight W. Stone, II, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, L.L.P., on brief…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · July 22, 2015 · in the opinion
Baumgartner v. American Standard, Inc. (2015)
…C. § 2315.21(B). Here, there is clearly a conflict as to the assessment of punitive damages. See e.g., Dodson v. Ford Motor Co., 2006 WL 2642199, at [\2] (R.I. Super. Sept. 5, 2006…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 28, 1988 · in the opinion
Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1988)
…See Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1163 (4th Cir.1986) ("permissible inferences must ... be within the range of reasonable probability") (quoting Ford Motor Co. v. McDavid, 259 F.2d 261, 266 (4th…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2012 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific v. Farrar (2012)
…of other suppliers. Id. at 209 (footnote omitted). \[5\] We will briefly comment upon an additional matter. On June 29, 2012, this Court filed its opinion in Dixon v. Ford Motor Co., \_\_\_ Md. App. \_\_\_, No. 536…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · March 28, 1986
Roehling v. Nat. Gypsum Co. Gold Bond Bldg. (1986)
…Huntley Power Station exposure and remanded for trial, but affirmed summary judgment for Celotex and on the DuPont and Ford plant exposures. Circumstantial evidence that the plaintiff worked in the same area, at the same time…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 27, 1995 · in the opinion
ACandS, Inc. v. Asner (1995)
…C. Petersen, Padraic McSherry Morton and Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant, Porter Hayden Co. B. Ford Davis (Dwight W. Stone, II and Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant, ACandS…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · April 4, 1996 · in the opinion
Simmons v. Pacor, Inc. (1996)
…under different circumstances, recovery should be allowed for other damages flowing from asymptomatic pleural thickening. Judge Del Sole also filed a concurring opinion in which Judge Ford Elliot joined. Judge Del Sole agreed that a person…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 3, 2019 · in the opinion
Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2019)
…is relevant. State v. Robertson, No. 40, slip op. at 8 (Md. Apr. 2, 2019); see also Ford v. State, 462 Md. 3, 46, 197 A.3d 1090, 1115 (2018), reconsideration denied (Dec. 11, 2018). In…
-
Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · June 1, 2018 · in the opinion
Kinseth v. Weil-McLain (2018)
…It is not about what the family needs, it is about sending a message to a company who you've evaluated how they spend some of their money, you've evaluated some of their actions with…