No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

43 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 2 of 3

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 20, 2017

    Altman v. Ford Motor Co. (In re New York City Asbetos Litigation, 2017)

    …Benicia Pump Repair Benicia 1950s-1980s; helper in boiler and furnace removal and installation stepfather's boiler and furnace business 1950s; worker at a construction products company 1970s; handyman 1970s and 1980s; union carpenter various construction…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · January 27, 2009 · in the opinion

    Martin v. Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company (2009)

    …II. ANALYSIS A. Standard of Review As this is a diversity action, Kentucky substantive law applies. Gahafer v. Ford Motor Co., 328 F.3d 859, 861 (6th Cir. 2003). Procedurally, federal standards for summary judgment govern…

  3. Court case · Maryland Appellate Court · February 8, 2024 · in the opinion

    Basil-Flippen v. General Electric Company (2024)

    …it is merely incorporated into something larger, the strict liability will be found to carry through to the ultimate user or consumer," rather than to the assembler. Id. In Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, 119 Md…

  4. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · September 28, 2020 · in the opinion

    Gibbs v. 84 Lumber Company (2020)

    …238, 242 (4th Cir. 1971) (finding that the duty-to-warn arises when the user may not realize the potential danger of a product))); see Watson v. Ford Motor Co., 389 S.C. 434, 444, 699…

  5. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 19, 2008 · in the opinion

    Weible v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2008)

    …KimberlyClark Corp., Walter B. Gallagher Co., Atco, Borg-Warner Corp., Columbia Boiler Co., Chrysler Corp., Ford Motor Co., General Motors Corp., Ingersoll Rand, John Crane, Inc., Maremont Corp., Pa Brake Bonding, Pneumo Abex Corp., United Gilsonite…

  6. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · January 14, 2004 · in the opinion

    In re Roc (2004)

    …based on a reliable foundation). This court has held that when "an expert's testimony lacks a reliable scientific basis, its admission by the trial court constitutes an abuse of discretion." Ford Motor Co. v. Aguiniga…

  7. Court case · Utah Supreme Court · November 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Boynton v. Kennecott Utah Copper, LLC (2021)

    …E.2d at 210; In re Certified Question from Fourteenth Dist. Ct. App. of Tex. (Miller v. Ford Motor Co.), 479 Mich. 498, 740 N.W.2d 206, 214-15 (2007). For those courts, the "relationship…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · August 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Paroni EX rel. Estate OF Paroni v. General Electric UK Holdings Ltd. (2021)

    …474-75). To satisfy this minimum-contacts inquiry, the Court "recogniz\[es\] two kinds of personal jurisdiction: general (sometimes called all-purpose) jurisdiction and specific (sometimes called case-linked) jurisdiction." Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · January 7, 2022 · in the opinion

    Data v. Joy Global Underground Mining (2022)

    …where they have unquestionably suffered harm on account of a disease having a long latency period and must prove specific causation under prevailing Pennsylvania law which may be insurmountable." Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 637 Pa…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2000 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. John Crane, Inc. (2000)

    …society ascribes some fault to this conduct." (Id. at p. 1188, 272 Cal.Rptr. 304.) Quoting Montez v. Ford Motor Co. \[ (1980) \] 101 Cal.App.3d 315, 318-319, 161 Cal.Rptr. 578, the court continued…

  11. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)

    …actual, product-specific causation in many asbestos cases, the courts have come to accept abstract assessments of increased risk as proxies for traditional substantial-factor causation. See Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 637 Pa. 625, 668…

  12. Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · April 5, 2023 · in the opinion

    Glenn v. 3M Co. (2023)

    …been anticipated by the manufacturer or seller...." Small, 329 S.C. at 466, 494 S.E.2d at 844. Fisher cites Branham v. Ford Motor Co., 390 S.C. 203, 210, 701 S.E.2d 5…

  13. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 11, 2009 · in the opinion

    Burger v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2009)

    …deposition, Mr. Burger testified he performed automotive repairs and, from the early 1950's to the early 1980's, he used brakes from Ford, Chrysler, General Motors, Pep Boys, and NAPA stores. Deposition of Jon Burger…

  14. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · July 22, 2015 · in the opinion

    Baumgartner v. American Standard, Inc. (2015)

    …C. § 2315.21(B). Here, there is clearly a conflict as to the assessment of punitive damages. See e.g., Dodson v. Ford Motor Co., 2006 WL 2642199, at [\2] (R.I. Super. Sept. 5, 2006…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · February 10, 2015 · in the opinion

    Hendricks v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2015)

    …originally been filed in federal court. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a); see also Snow v. Ford Motor Co., 561 F.2d 787, 789 (9th Cir. 1977). As the removing party, Defendant bears the burden of…

  16. Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · January 19, 1994 · in the opinion

    Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)

    …565-66 (1992) ("\[I\]t seems highly illogical and unfair for courts to determine at what point punitive damage awards should cease."); Wangen v. Ford Motor Co., 97 Wis.2d 260, 294 N.W.2d 437…

  17. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · March 28, 1986

    Roehling v. Nat. Gypsum Co. Gold Bond Bldg. (1986)

    …Huntley Power Station exposure and remanded for trial, but affirmed summary judgment for Celotex and on the DuPont and Ford plant exposures. Circumstantial evidence that the plaintiff worked in the same area, at the same time…

  18. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 6, 2014

    Juni v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2014)

    The court denied defendant Dana Companies, LLC's motion for summary judgment, so plaintiffs Arthur and Mary Juni kept their claims against Dana. On summary judgment in an asbestos case, a plaintiff need only show facts…

  19. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 23, 2013

    Juni v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2013)

    …courier, mechanic and foreman. He testified that from the late 1970s to the late 1980s he regularly installed new clutches on the company's Ford bucket trucks, about one per truck each month, and that Lipe…

  20. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · November 18, 2010 · in the opinion

    Nostrom v. AW Chesterton Co. (2010)

    …725 JUDITH NOSTROM, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of DONALD NOSTROM, Deceased, Appellant, v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al., Defendants, and CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al., Respondents. No. 187 Argued…