44 results for “General Electric”, page 2 of 3
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion
MacCormack v. the Adel Wiggins Group (2017)
…. ." \[Doc. \#333-1, at 18-19\]. \[2\] Hovsepian claimed breach of warranty under Massachusetts General Laws ch. 106, § 2-318. He argued that "the defendants expressly and impliedly warranted that the asbestos and asbestoscontaining products and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · August 12, 2024 · in the opinion
Guthe v. Johnson & Johnson (2024)
…App. 2015) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). The general rule is that after delivering the contract work to a purchaser, a contractor is not liable to persons with whom it did not contract, unless the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · July 28, 2014 · in the opinion
Pickard v. Dap, Inc. (2014)
…Cir. 1983). When a party seeking removal alleges fraudulent joinder, the removing party bears the substantial burden of proving the alleged fraud. See Parnas v. General Motors Corp., 879 F. Supp. 91, 92 (E.D. Mo…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · October 31, 2006 · in the opinion
HK Porter Company, Inc. v. Transit Casualty Company IN Receivership (2006)
…when it was declared to be insolvent by the Cole County Circuit Court. At pertinent times herein, National Underwriting Agency ("NUA") was managing general agent for Transit. In April 1982, three years before Transit's insolvency…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · January 21, 2020 · in the opinion
Douglas v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. (2020)
…of a motion to transfer under § 1404(a), the general view is \that courts can just as easily apply the law of another state as easily as their own.'" See generally Oien v. Thompson, 824 F…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · June 19, 2012 · in the opinion
Wagner v. Bondex International, Inc. (2012)
…fiber that began or caused the process that resulted in mesothelioma, but that asbestos fiber in general is the only known cause of the disease. Dr. Maddox also testified that mesothelioma results from an individual's…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · June 23, 2020 · in the opinion
Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson (2020)
…forth sufficient minimum contacts between Defendants and Missouri to allow the court to exercise personal jurisdiction over them on the Non-Resident Plaintiffs' claims. "Courts recognize two categories of personal jurisdiction: general and specific." Ristesund v…
-
Court case · Missouri Supreme Court · May 22, 2018 · in the opinion
Accident Fund Insurance Company v. Casey (2018)
…then, within 90 days, filing a motion to substitute. Rule 52.13. But "\[a\]s a general proposition, the Missouri Rules of Civil Procedure, including its pleading requirements, do not apply to workers' compensation actions, unless…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · April 10, 2015 · in the opinion
Schaffer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2015)
…cited in the Petition that creates a federal cause of action. Moreover, a case with a general maritime nature requesting common law remedies does not provide a ground for federal jurisdiction. Pierce v. Parker Towing Co.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion
MacCormack v. the Adel Wiggins Group (2017)
…App. Ct. 1987) (reasoning that a worsening of a condition did not justify a subsequent new action as "\[t\]he general rule is, of course, that a plaintiff is entitled to one recovery in a personal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · December 21, 2011 · in the opinion
Carey v. JP Bushnell Packing Supply Company (2011)
…In deciding this issue, the Court may consider the pleadings and supporting affidavits. Parnas v. General Motors Corp., 879 F.Supp. 91, 92 (E.D.Mo.1995). Discussion Plaintiffs allege Plaintiff John Carey contracted mesothelioma as…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · January 18, 2018 · in the opinion
New Hampshire Insurance Company v. Pennington (2018)
…the purpose of adding Noranda as a party defendant. Discussion I. Personal Jurisdiction Defendant Pennington first argues that this Court has neither general nor specific jurisdiction over her. "When personal jurisdiction is challenged by a defendant…
-
Court case · Missouri Supreme Court · February 18, 2020 · in the opinion
Hegger v. Valley Farm Dairy Company (2020)
…2012) (holding the term "injury" in the Act encompassed occupational diseases). The general assembly amended the workers' compensation law in 2013 to provide the exclusive remedy for occupational diseases caused by toxic exposure in the workplace…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Missouri · October 3, 2017 · in the opinion
Holzer v. Athene Annuity & Life Assurance Co. (2017)
…the mine. The general rule governing the personal liability of an officer or director of a corporation for torts committed by the corporation is that he is not liable where he has not participated therein, nor…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · July 22, 2016 · in the opinion
Hartfield v. 3M Company (2016)
…however, because she did not allege that the dealership had knowledge of the defect when it sold the car and state law did not impose on the dealership a general post-sale duty to warn. Id…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · August 3, 1993 · in the opinion
Clayton Center Assoc. v. WR Grace & Co. (1993)
…endanger the health of workers, office employees, and the general public." Their concern included "future demolition of buildings that will release asbestos or other materials into the atmosphere." An August, 1970 memorandum, in which one of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · September 11, 2017 · in the opinion
MacCormack v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2017)
…911 (Mass. App. Ct. 1987) (reasoning that a worsening of a condition did not justify a subsequent new action as "\[t\]he general rule is, of course, that a plaintiff the "identity of issues" factor. 8…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · February 2, 1993 · in the opinion
Harashe v. Flintkote Co. (1993)
…provided for the assumption of liabilities actual and contingent and the peripheral issue of choice of laws. The elements of a de facto merger are: (1) a continuation of management and personnel and general business operations…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · December 19, 2017 · in the opinion
Accident Fund Insurance Company v. Casey (2017)
…January 1, 2014." Thus, the General Assembly has specified that the provisions of Section 287.200.4 shall apply to claims like the one asserted by Casey's survivors. Employer and Insurer argue that, under Article…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · August 14, 2018 · in the opinion
Otten v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (2018)
…her son maintained the underlying lawsuit as a wrongful death action. Crescent maintained one or more commercial general liability insurance policies from Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, which later sold some or all of its policies to…