No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

94 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 2 of 5

  1. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion

    Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer (2013)

    …determine whether an exposure was causal. See, e.g., Code § 8.01-249(4) (addressing the statute of limitations for latent mesothelioma cases); see also Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson, 243 Va. 128, 143-44…

  2. Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · June 1, 2018 · in the opinion

    Kinseth v. Weil-McLain (2018)

    …1986)). In order for a jury to allocate fault against a party, the plaintiff must have a "viable claim against that party." Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 510 N.W.2d 854, 863 (Iowa 1994)…

  3. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 30, 2010 · in the opinion

    Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2010)

    …is \[a\] significant and substantial contributing factor to the \[plaintiff's\] asbestos related disease." Smalls v. Pittsburgh-Corning, 843 A.2d 410, 414 (Pa.Super.2004); Cauthorn v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 840 A.2d 1028…

  4. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 13, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Stephens (2007)

    …by defendant, and coworker testified that he used defendant's pipe covering approximately ninety percent of time and installed it in areas where plaintiff regularly worked). But cf. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · September 25, 2018 · in the opinion

    Doolin v. Ford Motor Company (2018)

    …Ct. App. 2016); Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 595 So. 2d 443, 456 (Ala. 1992) (finding summary judgment was inappropriate where evidence showed the decedent worked close to where asbestos products were used and expert…

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 22, 2016 · in the opinion

    Bartolone v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2016)

    …Grace & Co.-Conn), 216 AD2d 79 \[1st Dept. 1995\]). Issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where "\[t\]he deposition testimony of a litigant is…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 25, 2021 · in the opinion

    Putt v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2021)

    …does not equal absolute liability. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 994.) Because all Ford offered the jury was a "vague impression that \[the\] other products \[were\] somewhat similar," because Ford…

  8. Asbestos type

    Chrysotile: White Asbestos, the Most Common Type

    …Co Hydrous calcium silicates (US Patent 2,875,075, 1959), Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp Method of molding foundry core drier supports (US Patent 2,873,480, 1959), Johns Manville Monolithic porous filler for cylinders and method…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 16, 2010 · in the opinion

    Stewart v. Union Carbide Corporation (2010)

    …Ltd. (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 651; Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1188.) Union Carbide does not address these cases with any specificity, but only refers to plaintiffs' reliance…

  10. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · September 11, 2015 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. (2015)

    …and ultimately settled with or dismissed the other defendants. In such a situation, Zenith and Motorola would be entitled to an apportionment instruction. In Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Parrish, 58 S.W.3d 467 (Ky…

  11. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2012 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific v. Farrar (2012)

    …work clothes. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Granski against, inter alia, Owens-Corning, f/k/a Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation ("OC"), who manufactured a hazardous asbestos-containing insulation product called Kaylo. Id. at…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    Merrill v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2009)

    …types of product defects: (1) manufacturing defects; (2) design defects, and (3) warning defects. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549\].) The third…

  13. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 17, 2003 · in the opinion

    Garlock v. Gallagher (2003)

    …1992). Thus, we are not privy to dissect the evidence and weigh the credibility of its messengers, which is what Crane has asked us to do. See Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    Petitpas v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    …and warning defects. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995.) "\[A\] product is defective in design either (1) if the product has failed to perform as safely as an ordinary consumer…

  15. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 5, 2018 · in the opinion

    McKinney v. Hobart Bros. Co. (2018)

    …along on every draft of air (and here we are looking at the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, as we must do (see McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 188 Ill. 2d 102…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 21, 2016 · in the opinion

    Baeza v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2016)

    …employer had no liability for plaintiff's injuries beyond payment of workers' compensation benefits\]; Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1198 \[applied Proposition 51 to strict liability asbestos case\].) Defendant…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 14, 2007 · in the opinion

    Rosen v. Regents of University of California (2007)

    …care. In such a case, liability turns on what a reasonably prudent distributor would have known and warned about. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1002-1003 (Anderson); Valentine v. Baxter…

  18. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 29, 2009 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Saville (2009)

    …to the Cross-Defendants' products than to Scapa's products, and that the jury's verdict is therefore inconsistent and warrants a JNOV.\[5\] As the Court of Appeals explained in Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Mata v. Liberty Utilities (park Water) Corp. (2020)

    …2019) 37 Cal.App.5th 292, 332.) III. Section 3294 Punitive damages serve the dual public purposes of punishment and deterrence. (Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1658; see § 3294…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 4, 1999 · in the opinion

    Ehret v. Congoleum Corp. (1999)

    …its motion for new trial. At the August 22 hearing, the court and counsel discussed Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp: (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 438, 941 P.2d 71 (Buttram)…