32 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 2 of 2
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 27, 2009 · in the opinion
Mahoney v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2009)
…the reasons set forth below. A. Causation GP contends that plaintiffs failed to introduce evidence sufficient to satisfy the "substantial factor" standard of causation set forth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · November 16, 2009 · in the opinion
Csr, Limited v. Taylor (2009)
…their claims in Australia strikes me as the antithesis of "fair play and substantial justice." Chief Judge Bell and Judge Raker have authorized me to state that they join this dissenting opinion. \[1\] In Owens-Illinois…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 11, 2018 · in the opinion
Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Coates (2018)
…a negligent failure to warn action." May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp., 446 Md. 1, 25 n.22 (2015) (citation omitted). In Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia, supra, the Court noted that Professors Henderson and Twerski …
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 10, 2015 · in the opinion
Green v. CertainTEED Corporation (2015)
…Step One Turning to step one, California and Texas apply different standards to determine the issue of causation in asbestos litigation. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford), sets forth the "substantial…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2021 · in the opinion
Phipps v. Copeland Corporation LLC (2021)
…was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 14, 2014 · in the opinion
McGuire v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2014)
…searching cross-examination, to that which Raybestos has in the current litigation. Id. at 1295. The second of these cases is Murphy v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 779 F.2d 340 (6th Cir. 1985). Murphy recognized the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 25, 2014 · in the opinion
Lovelace v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2014)
…tortfeasors, we "resolve all conflicts in the evidence in favor of respondent, and indulge all legitimate and reasonable inferences in support of the judgment." (Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 471…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · January 8, 2015
Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2015)
…ended before the marriage, but denied it to Georgia-Pacific. A defendant owes no duty to a spouse for loss of consortium if the couple was not married when the asbestos exposure occurred, and insurance-policy…
-
Medical study · Medical research · 2020
Induction of Gamma-Glutamyltransferase Activity and Consequent Pro-oxidant Reactions in Human Macrophages Exposed to Crocidolite Asbestos
Asbestos is the main causative agent of malignant pleural mesothelioma. The variety known as crocidolite (blue asbestos) owns the highest pathogenic potential, due to the dimensions of its fibers as well as to its content of…
-
Asbestos type
Crocidolite: Blue Asbestos, the Deadliest Type
…1950s and 1960s, to the South African mills of the late 1970s. Each link opens the article's page in that issue. Early History of Blue Asbestos, July 1922 Blue Asbestos Mattress Coverings, January 1923 Asbestos…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 21, 2019 · in the opinion
Leavitt v. Rogers Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 31, 1982 · in the opinion
Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd. (1982)
…Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. Day, Alaska, 594 P.2d 38, 47 (1979); Owen, Punitive Damages in Products Liability Litigation, 74 Mich.L.Rev. 1257, 1277-1299 (1976). See also State ex. rel. Young v. Crookham…