No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

177 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 2 of 9

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · April 4, 1996 · in the opinion

    Simmons v. Pacor, Inc. (1996)

    …202 N.J.Super. 556, 495 A.2d 495 (1985); Lavelle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation et al., 507 N.E.2d 476 (Ohio Com.Pl.1987); Beeman v. Manville Corporation, 496 N.W.2d 247…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · May 9, 1991 · in the opinion

    Sawyer v. Fibreboard Corp. (In re Hawaii Federal Asbestos Cases, 1991)

    …jury's apportionment of responsibility was as follows: Owens-Illinois (6.5%); Fibreboard (6.5%); Pittsburgh-Corning (6.5%); Raymark Industries (13.2%); H.K. Porter Co. (5%); Eagle-Picher (3.5%); Owens-Corning Fiberglass (3%)…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · August 18, 1988 · in the opinion

    Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1988)

    …defendants' motion for judgment is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. \[1\] Johns-Manville Corporation and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation. Plaintiff did not name Johns-Manville because it had filed for bankruptcy status. \[2\] Contra Abel v…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 11, 1994 · in the opinion

    DiDio v. Philadelphia Asbestos Corp. (1994)

    …A.2d 919 (1993). Secondly, regarding the severance of Owens-Illinois' crossclaims against settling defendants, I observe that the procedural mechanism of severance distinguishes this case from Deptula v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Company, 425 Pa.Super…

  5. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · July 21, 2010 · in the opinion

    Summers v. Certainteed Corp. (2010)

    Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 840 A.2d 1028 (Pa.Super.2004) (outlining the competing standards for establishment of a prima facie case).\[10\] The OISR then opined that Appellants, through Dr. Gelfand's reports and conclusions…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 19, 2021 · in the opinion

    Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2021)

    Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that the plaintiffs showed evidence of frequent and regular exposure where they were exposed to asbestos dust on a daily basis…

  7. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Lamson v. Georgia-Pacific LLC (2019)

    …more than the presence of asbestos in the workplace; he must prove that he worked in the vicinity of the product's use. Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 729 A.2d 614, 622 (Pa. Super…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. Caterpillar, Inc. (2017)

    821 Moreover, the plaintiff must show "the manufacturer's asbestos product was used at the specific site within the workplace where \[the plaintiff\] worked." Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F.Supp. 172, 174 (W…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 18, 2009 · in the opinion

    O'neil v. Crane Co. (2009)

    …PLC (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1224 \[53 Cal.Rptr.2d 642\]; Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1187 \[74 Cal.Rptr.2d 580\] \[raw asbestos fibers are not altered…

  10. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 26, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Stephens (2007)

    …by defendant, and coworker testified that he used defendant's pipe covering approximately ninety percent of time and installed it in areas where plaintiff regularly worked). But cf. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 682 A…

  11. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · February 27, 1992 · in the opinion

    Stevenson v. Keene Corp. (1992)

    …of joint and several liability includes cases of "exposure to ... harmful organic or mineral substances", exception applicable to asbestos cases, McNair v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 890 F.2d 753 (5th Cir.Tex. 1989)); Haw. Rev…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · August 31, 2000 · in the opinion

    Caruolo v. John Crane, Inc. (2000)

    …C and S, Inc., Combustion Engineering, Inc., Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Fibreboard Corporation, U.S. Mineral Products Co., Pittsburgh-Corning Corp., The Flintkote Company, Rockwool Manufacturing Company, Anchor Packing Company, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Rapid-American…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2011 · in the opinion

    Woodard v. Crane Co. (2011)

    …design defects, and failure to warn. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995.) In his complaint, Woodard alleged that Crane's valves were defective based on theories of defective design and…

  14. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · December 28, 2007 · in the opinion

    Gregg v. VJ Auto Parts Company (2007)

    …A-Best Products Co., 757 A.2d 367, 376 (Pa. Super. 2000), and Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 729 A.2d 614, 623 (Pa. Super. 1999)). Like the common pleas court, Judge Bowes observed that…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 16, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. John Crane (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …in the scope of \[the plaintiffs\] entire work history," should be considered in determining whether defendant's conduct was a substantial contributing factor. Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 571 N.W.2d 530, 533 (Mich…

  16. Court case · California Supreme Court · January 12, 2012 · in the opinion

    O'neil v. Crane Co. (2012)

    …General Principles (8) "Generally speaking, manufacturers have a duty to warn consumers about the hazards inherent in their products. (Anderson \[v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.\], supra, 53 Cal.3d at p. 1003.) The requirement's purpose…

  17. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · June 13, 2013 · in the opinion

    Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)

    …289 P.3d at 195; see Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 510 N.W.2d 854, 861 (Iowa 1994) (finding that "it is not necessary and indeed may be impossible to establish exactly how much…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 8, 2010 · in the opinion

    Reaser v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)

    …the forum non conveniens motion can be granted. In that regard, Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 (Hansen) is instructive. Hansen was an asbestos case with 200 named defendants. (Id…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 24, 2008 · in the opinion

    Cunningham v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2008)

    …and Arena v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178 (Arena)\[10\] are unavailing because their attempts to portray their products as too "technical" or "complicated" for application of the consumer expectations test…

  20. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 11, 2009 · in the opinion

    Gregg v. VJ Auto Parts Co. (2009)

    …2000 PA Super 203, 757 A.2d 367, 376 (Pa.Super.2000), and Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 1999 PA Super 82, 729 A.2d 614, 623 (Pa.Super.1999)). [\1176] Like the common pleas…