547 results for “General Electric”, page 22 of 28
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 11, 2008 · in the opinion
Crowley Maritime Corporation v. Boston Old Colony Insurance Company (2008)
…and (2) respondents are not signatories to the arbitration agreements, and the general rule under both California and federal law is that nonsignatories cannot be compelled to arbitrate. Appellants claim the trial court erred. We disagree…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 18, 2016 · in the opinion
DePriest v. Crane Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2016)
…Here, the evidence that plaintiffs' medical experts intend to submit has the potential to sufficiently establish a general connection between asbestos and mesothelioma, as well as a scientific expression of plaintiffs' exposure levels based on Stagnito…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 21, 2022 · in the opinion
Sentilles v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2022)
…b). II. ANALYSIS Rule 54(b) is an exception to the general rule that a final judgment is appealable only after the adjudication of the rights and liabilities of all parties to a proceeding. Westmoreland v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · November 26, 2013 · in the opinion
Cabasug v. Crane Company (2013)
…limited; pipefitter journeyman; nuclear inspector, Code 139; General Engineer, Code 365; and Test Engineer and Risk Control. Plaintiffs asserts that he was exposed to asbestos up until 1986 when he was promoted to an office job…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 28, 1997 · in the opinion
Mavroudis v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. (1997)
…evidence or the supposed inadequacies therein, with the single exception of one general objection based on hearsay contained in the declarations of counsel [\693] provided for use at the reasonableness hearing. Even that objection is not…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 10, 1988 · in the opinion
Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. US (1988)
…the LHWCA; and (2) under the LHWCA, Eagle-Picher need not satisfy the general admiralty jurisdiction requirement that the underlying wrong had a significant relationship (i.e., a nexus) to a traditional maritime activity. Executive Jet…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 23, 2005 · in the opinion
Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2005)
…them for consumer use, and failing to recall or remove such products from the stream of commerce in spite of knowing of their unsafe and dangerous nature.\[6\] In addition to these general allegations, "Count Two…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · November 30, 2020 · in the opinion
Wineland v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)
…Daubert, 509 U.S. at 594-95. In general, the expert's opinion must be based on principles, techniques, or theories that are generally accepted in his or her profession and must reflect something more than…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · March 5, 1996 · in the opinion
Dollas v. WR Grace & Co. (1996)
…that Monokote was not used on The Constellation in the face of unequivocal testimony that it was. A court may only apply judicial notice to matters "of common and general knowledge, well established and authoritatively settled…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · February 22, 2013 · in the opinion
Santos v. AC McLOON Oil Co. (2013)
…. the gestalt factors should not be employed." Cerberus Partners, L.P, 836 A.2d at 1122. C Discussion The parties agree that this Court lacks general personal jurisdiction over Defendants. Plaintiff argues, however, that this Court…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 23, 1999 · in the opinion
Pittsburgh Corning Corp. v. James (1999)
…exposure to asbestos. The issue really is the more general one—whether forcing any movant to await final judgment makes the issue of inconvenient forum effectively non-reviewable. Our view as to that was, to some…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · March 23, 1984 · in the opinion
Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)
…not prove that he presently suffers from that disease. In arguing that the cancer evidence was properly admissible, Jackson relies on the general rule of tort law that allows for recovery of all harms — past, present…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 22, 2016 · in the opinion
Bartolone v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2016)
…a Union Carbide product or provide a "scientific expression" of an exposure level. Dr. Moline cannot establish general or specific causation, defendant argues, where the product cannot be identified. PLAINTIFF'S ARGUMENTS Plaintiff argues that Campanella…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 28, 2022 · in the opinion
Matherne v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2022)
…and the National Conference of Insurance Guaranty Funds, and published the claims filing procedure in the newspaper of general circulation where Bedivere had its principal place of business, and in a magazine recognized as a source…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 6, 2022 · in the opinion
Adams v. Eagle, Inc. (2022)
…by Louisiana courts, \[54\] and involves a showing of both general and specific causation. "General causation is whether a substance is capable of causing a particular injury or condition in the general population, while specific causation…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2009 · in the opinion
Silvestro v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2009)
…to chrysotile." \[3\] Although Silvestro again worked in construction after his career as boiler repairman, the evidence showed that use of asbestos in construction materials (and in general) was being curtailed by the 1970's, and…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 21, 2021 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Aerco Intl., Inc. (2021)
…exposure to a toxin; (2) that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness, or "general causation"; and (3) that plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness, or "specific…
-
Court case · Maine Supreme Judicial Court · January 17, 1984 · in the opinion
Austin v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. (1984)
…at 799; Prosser, supra at 522. Recent cases typified by Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal.3d 725, 575 P.2d 1162, 144 Cal.Rptr. 380 (1978) (ordinary contributory negligence of plaintiff to be considered…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 26, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Honeywell Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)
…reliability, the Court "assess\[es\] the \[expert's\] reasoning or methodology, using as appropriate such criteria as testability, publication in peer reviewed literature, and general acceptance." Id. at 564. III. DISCUSSION Defendant argues that Dr. Brodkin…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · March 1, 1983 · in the opinion
Carter v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1983)
…been even reasonably knowable. The supplier would thus be free of culpability, but a price of his doing business is to protect people from danger from his products — or to pay. General Motors Corp. v. Hopkins…