No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

848 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 24 of 43

  1. State law · Tennessee

    Tennessee Mesothelioma Lawyer: Asbestos Claims, Deadlines & Compensation

    …Woodruff v. Ford Motor Co., No. E2023-00488-SC-R11-CV (Tenn. July 21, 2026) — Coffman does not require dismissal of every warning claim involving another company's product. Last reviewed: November 2026. The Law Offices…

  2. State law · Texas

    Texas Mesothelioma Lawyer: Asbestos Claims, Deadlines & Compensation

    …du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Robinson, 923 S.W.2d 549 (Tex. 1995) — Expert testimony reliability framework. Ford Motor Co. v. Ledesma, 242 S.W.3d 32 (Tex. 2007) — Producing-cause causation framework for strict…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 22, 2018 · in the opinion

    Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)

    …22]-23 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2014), on reconsideration sub nom. Yates v. Ford Motor Co., No. 5:12-CV-752-FL, 2015 WL 9222834 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 17, 2015) (applying "the…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Thurmon v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2014)

    …aims of the MDL process and lessen the system's effectiveness." Hill v. Ford Motor Co., 975 F.Supp.2d 1351, 1358 (N.D.Ga. 2013) (quoting In re Ford Motor Co., 591 F.3d 406…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 29, 2020 · in the opinion

    Bader v. Avon Products, Inc. (2020)

    …Supreme Court may soon shed light on this issue in Bandemer v. Ford Motor Co. (Minn. 2019) 931 N.W.2d 744, Supreme Court Minutes, January 17, 2020, certiorari granted sub nom. Ford Motor Co. v…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · November 7, 2014 · in the opinion

    Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)

    …collecting and rejecting cases applying a "modified or adjusted" Lohrmann test in mesothelioma cases as inconsistent with a prediction that the North Carolina Supreme Court would adopt the Lohrmann test); see also Ford Motor Co. v…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 16, 2015 · in the opinion

    Leidig v. Zenith Electronics LLC (2015)

    …1196; see also Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co. (1981) 119 Cal.App.3d 757, 788-789.) The court also sustained relevance objections to the supplemental evidence of specifications calling for asbestos strips in two Zenith radio…

  8. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 26, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Stephens (2007)

    …of Appeals recently decided a case in which a brake worker had inhaled asbestos dust from installing the brake products of six different manufacturers. Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co., 91 S.W.3d 387, 393 (Tex…

  9. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · July 31, 1986 · in the opinion

    Fischer v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    …of corporations, is that punitive damages unfairly punish innocent shareholders. This argument has been rejected repeatedly. E.g., Wangen v. Ford Motor Co., 97 Wis.2d 260, 289, 294 N.W.2d 437, 453 (1980); Martin…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · April 11, 2022 · in the opinion

    Lishman v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    …waive personal jurisdiction. The Court next turns to the merits of the personal jurisdiction defense. As discussed, personal jurisdiction is either general or specific. See Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eight Judicial District Court, 141 S…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 10, 2011 · in the opinion

    Breedlove v. CSX Transportation (In re Liability Litigation, 2011)

    …permitted, over objection by a defendant, in at least one other MDL case before this Court. See Kirkland v. Ford Motor Co., 09-74077: Doc. 65 \[December 1, 2010 Order of the Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion

    Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)

    …but they may be established by circumstantial evidence, in accordance with ordinary standards of proof. Romo v. Ford Motor Co., 99 Cal.App.4th 1115, 1141 (2002) ("It is difficult to imagine how corporate malice could…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)

    …(2008) 159 Cal.App.4th 655, 690-691.) As our Supreme Court stated in Johnson v. Ford Motor Co. (2005) 35 Cal.4th 1191, "\[t\]o consider the defendant's entire course of conduct in setting…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 6, 2013 · in the opinion

    Klinger v. Alderete (2013)

    …Klinger, Donadio learned that Alderete was suffering from lung cancer and not mesothelioma. Donadio also stated that the decision in Campbell v. Ford Motor Co. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 15 (Campbell), issued on May 21…

  15. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 8, 2013 · in the opinion

    Georgia Pacific v. Farrar (2013)

    …Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 125 Ohio St.3d 510, 929 N.E.2d 448 (2010); Campbell v. Ford Motor Co., 206 Cal.App.4th 15, 141 Cal. Rptr.3d 390 (2012); and In re Eighth Judicial…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · June 12, 2023 · in the opinion

    Finello v. Foster Wheeler LLC (2023)

    …fibers. We agree with Tragarz Court's approach and adopt it here. Gregg v. V-J Auto Parts Company, 943 A.2d at 225-226. In Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032 (Pa…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 12, 1998 · in the opinion

    Arena v. Owens Corning Corp. (1998)

    …in a position to exert pressure on the manufacturer to that end; the retailer's strict liability thus serves as an added incentive to safety." (Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256, 262…

  18. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 13, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Stephens (2007)

    …Appeals recently decided a case in which a brake worker had inhaled asbestos dust from installing the brake products of six different manufacturers. Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co., 91 S.W.3d 387, 393 (Tex.App…

  19. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · November 18, 1993 · in the opinion

    Srite v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1993)

    …unpersuaded by plaintiffs' argument. The zero damages rule conflicts with the standard of review articulated by the Texas Supreme Court in the case of Pool v. Ford Motor Co., 715 S.W.2d 629, 635 (Tex…

  20. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 7, 2005 · in the opinion

    Brown v. Crown Cork & Seal Company (2005)

    …at 57. Brown recalled that he worked on various makes of cars, including General Motors, Chrysler, Plymouth, Dodge, and Ford. After removing old brakes from a car, Brown would take them to the dealership for that…