532 results for “General Electric”, page 24 of 27
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 13, 2018 · in the opinion
Nauheimer v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · July 15, 2013 · in the opinion
Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)
…recognizing that "evidence of settlement negotiations is generally inadmissible under \[Rule 408\] as irrelevant and contrary to public policy"). However, the discoverability of settlement information is governed by our state's general discovery rule, Super. R…
-
Court case · New York Court of Appeals · June 27, 2007 · in the opinion
Reynolds v. Garlock Sealing Technologies (Mtr OF Eighth Jud. Dist. Asbestos Litigation, 2007)
…441, 444 \[Utah 1989\]; Ratterree v Bartlett, 238 Kan 11, 29, 707 P2d 1063, 1076 \[1985\]; General Motors Corp. v Lahocki, 286 Md 714, 723-733, 410 A2d 1039, 1044-1048 \[1980\]; Ward v Ochoa, 284…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion
MacCormack v. the Adel Wiggins Group (2017)
…App. Ct. 1987) (reasoning that a worsening of a condition did not justify a subsequent new action as "\[t\]he general rule is, of course, that a plaintiff is entitled to one recovery in a personal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 22, 2010 · in the opinion
Faddish v. Warren Pumps, LLC (2010)
…Warren's objection that Mr. Faddish's testimony regarding pumps is too general to support an inference of Warren's liability is overruled, as Plaintiff's expert testimony is sufficient to raise a genuine issue of…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 26, 2006 · in the opinion
Blandford v. A-Best Prods. Co. (2006)
…also found that when a complaining party knows the identity of the other party's expert, the subject of his expertise and the general nature of his testimony, a party cannot complain that they are ambushed…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 15, 2008 · in the opinion
Whitlock v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2008)
…Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 859 \["\[A\]s a general matter, orders granting a new trial are examined for abuse of discretion."\].) (Italics added.) Further, as "\[t\]he standard for review of an…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion
Sprague v. Abb, Inc. (2021)
…exposure to a toxin; (2) that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness, or "general causation"; and (3) that plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness, or "specific…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion
Nolen v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2012)
…or 1975. Again, Ay's general testimony that manufacturers, including Foster Wheeler, specified the use of asbestos insulation up until 1971 does not lead to a reasonable inference that asbestos was specified by Foster Wheeler at…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 15, 2019 · in the opinion
Chalco v. Burnham (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…that defendant Burnham, LLC serve a copy of this Order with Notice of Entry on the Trial Support Clerk located in the General Clerk's Office (Room 119) and on the County Clerk, by e-filing…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · March 26, 2014 · in the opinion
Young v. Agco Corporation (2014)
…the Court need not conduct a de novo review where a party makes only "general and conclusory objections that do not direct the court to a specific error in the magistrate's proposed findings and recommendations…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 7, 2014 · in the opinion
Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)
…477 U.S. at 257. The moving defendants principally challenge the plaintiffs' evidence of exposure and causation as a general matter without distinguishing between the causes of action. In a case where the plaintiff developed asbestosis…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · June 13, 2013 · in the opinion
Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)
…product; (2) on a regular basis; (3) over an extended period of time; and (4) in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked." Chavers v. General Motors Corp., 79 S.W.3d 361, 368 (Ark. 2002)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Nevada · September 19, 2022 · in the opinion
Potter v. Crane Co. (2022)
…on a theory of successor liability, they must establish a prima facie showing of an exception to the general principal that "when one corporation sells all of its assets to another, the purchaser is not liable…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 1, 2009 · in the opinion
Walmach v. Wheeler (2009)
…probability that in the absence of the error, a result more favorable to the appealing party would have been reached." (Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 548, 574.) We Do Not Reach the…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 19, 2017 · in the opinion
Aquitato v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 28, 2015 · in the opinion
McALVEY v. Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC (2015)
…limited to the frequency, regularity and proximity of Plaintiff's exposure to asbestos products in general and his conclusion that Plaintiff experienced a significant exposure to asbestos based on his work activities. Finally, Defendants argue that…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 8, 2013 · in the opinion
Kelly v. Airco Welders Supply (2013)
…it down with us, we would use the Zip. \ \ \ \ Q. Then, in general do you remember what types of applications the Milwaukee valves that you and Mr. Kelly encountered were used for? A. I thought it…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · December 21, 2011 · in the opinion
Carey v. JP Bushnell Packing Supply Company (2011)
…In deciding this issue, the Court may consider the pleadings and supporting affidavits. Parnas v. General Motors Corp., 879 F.Supp. 91, 92 (E.D.Mo.1995). Discussion Plaintiffs allege Plaintiff John Carey contracted mesothelioma as…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 3, 2021 · in the opinion
Steib v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2021)
…defendants; Marathon's motion stated that it was joining the motions, in general, "to the extent that said motions and memorandum do not conflict with Marathon's defenses in this matter." As to Parsons' motion, in…