848 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 25 of 43
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 24, 2014 · in the opinion
Shipley v. Hoke (2014)
…regarding the effect of termination of supplementary proceedings. ¶ 75 Whether the court had subject-matter jurisdiction to entertain a claim is a question of law that we review de novo. Crossroads Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 25, 2016 · in the opinion
Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)
…Grilli Marcus, Whiteford [\810] Taylor and Preston LLP, R. Thomas Radcliffe, Jr., Patrick C. Smith, Dehay and Elliston LLP, F. Ford Loker, Jr., Joshua Franklin Kahn, Leianne S. McEvoy, Michael L. Haslup, Matthew R. Schroll, Robin…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · November 20, 2019 · in the opinion
Mosher v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…Defendants, represented by Kelly A. Costello, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP. IMO Industries, Inc., Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. Siemens Industry, Inc., successor in interest to Siemens…
-
State law · New York
New York Mesothelioma Lawyer: Asbestos Claims, Deadlines & Compensation
…claims separate from lawsuits? Yes. Trust claims are administrative claims against bankruptcy trusts set up by companies that already filed for bankruptcy. But they are connected: in the New York City asbestos court, trust claims must…
-
Magazine · J-M Circle · 1930
The J-M Circle, 1930
…July 1930 July–August 1930 Seven Ford plants J-M roofed July 1930 July–August 1930 Here and there in the field July 1930 July–August 1930 The Kellogg Company has invested in quiet July 1930…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · May 8, 1996 · in the opinion
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Keeton (1996)
…Owens-Corning contends the trial court erred in admitting nineteen sets of documents over the company's objections that the documents were irrelevant to the plaintiffs' claims under the Alabama Extended Manufacturer's Liability Doctrine\[1…
-
Magazine · Industrial Hygiene Digest · 1942
Industrial Hygiene Digest, 1942
In the Library Pages on this site about the diseases and companies these issues name: Pneumoconiosis: 832. Pneumoconiosis (R. R. Sayers, Chairman of A.P.H.A. Committee, Am. Pub. Health Assoc. Year Book, 1941-1942…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · December 9, 2014 · in the opinion
Pavlick v. AM General (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2014)
…at 117-18.) Moreover, Mr. DiLoretto repeatedly established that the trucks could have been assembled by any number of possible manufacturers: Ford, General Motors, Chrysler, and "maybe American Motors \[AM General\]." (DiLoretto Dep. at 107, 111…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · September 30, 1996
Blase v. Allied Signal Inc. (1996)
Mildred Blase sued several companies after the death of her husband, Harold Blase, an auto mechanic at Bell of Pennsylvania. She claimed that working with the defendants' products, which allegedly contained asbestos, caused his lung cancer…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 29, 2011
Corley v. Bill Vann Co. (In re Liability Litigation, 2011)
The executor of Charles Corley's estate sued a group of companies in Alabama state court under the Alabama Wrongful Death Act. Mr. Corley had died of mesothelioma in October 2009. The case was removed to…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 18, 2015 · in the opinion
Voelker v. John Crane (Matter of Eighth Jud. Dist. Asbestos Litig., 2015)
…merit. Wherefore, it is hereby, ORDERED, that plaintiffs motion is granted and defendant's cross motion is denied. SO ORDERED. \[1\] Those entities were: Combustion Engineering; Ford Motor Co.; Foster-Wheeler Energy Co., LLC.; Garlock Sealing…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2019 · in the opinion
Rickert v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2019)
…as set forth in Ford Motor Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America (1995) 35 Cal.App.4th 604 (Ford.) But as NFL explained, Ford's "seriously inconvenient" standard applies — if at all — only when the…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · June 23, 2020 · in the opinion
Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson (2020)
…App. W.D. 2000). The second is where an agency relationship is established between a parent corporation and its subsidiary. See State ex rel. Ford Motor Co. v. Bacon, 63 S.W.3d 641, 642 (Mo…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · March 23, 1998 · in the opinion
McClain v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)
…International Armament Corp., 17 F.3d 992, 995 (7th Cir.1994); Barron v. Ford Motor Co. of Can., 965 F.2d 195, 198-99 (7th Cir.1992). Owens-Corning bears "an onerous burden \because a reviewing…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 29, 2020 · in the opinion
Estes v. Eaton Corporation (2020)
…authority cited by Estes, where the trial court specifically mentioned and rejected plaintiff's expert testimony as "\completely lacking in probative force.' "(See Meiner v. Ford Motor Co. (1971) 17 Cal.App.3d 127, 134-135.…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 3, 1998 · in the opinion
Scheiding v. General Motors Corp. (1998)
…59 Cal.2d 57, 27 Cal.Rptr. 697, 377 P.2d 897, and Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256, 37 Cal.Rptr. 896, 391 P.2d 168.) Viad reasons, "Because we find…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 30, 2014 · in the opinion
Barabin v. AstenJOHNSON, Inc. (2014)
…must "seek the rule \[it\] believe\[s\] that Court would adhere to were it confronted with a similar situation." Commercial Union Ins. Co. v. Ford Motor Co., 640 F.2d 210, 212 (9th Cir. 1981) Yet…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · November 23, 2021 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Orton (2021)
…underpinnings" and "correctness of the expert's conclusions" may affect any ultimate determination on the merits, but do not govern admissibility. See Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713, 718-19 (7th Cir. 2000)…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion
Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)
…actual, product-specific causation in many asbestos cases, the courts have come to accept abstract assessments of increased risk as proxies for traditional substantial-factor causation. See Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 637 Pa. 625, 668…
-
Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · July 26, 1993 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Keene Corp. (1993)
…Industries, Inc. v. Balbos, 326 Md. 179, 604 A.2d 445, 468-69 (1992); Wolfe v. Ford Motor Co., 6 Mass. App. Ct. 346, 376 N.E.2d 143, 147 (1978); Grady v. American Optical Corp.…