547 results for “General Electric”, page 27 of 28
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 21, 2015 · in the opinion
Wilde v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2015)
…Inc., 989 F.3d 812, 815 (5th Cir. 1993). As a general matter, the removal statute is to be construed narrowly and in favor of remand to state court. See Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sheets…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 27, 2020 · in the opinion
Broussard v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2020)
…2018). In general, a civil action must be removed within 30 days of the defendant's receipt of a copy of the initial pleading "setting forth the claim for relief upon which such action or proceeding…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 5, 2006 · in the opinion
Dankenbrink v. Foster Wheeler (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2006)
…products during overlapping periods of time from the 1940's to the 1990's so that the state of the art testimony and other expert testimony in a general way will be substantially common to all…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2009 · in the opinion
Wangen v. Gardner Denver, Inc. (2009)
…d\] that Soco West, Inc. is not subject to jurisdiction in the State of Washington." Plant Insulation Company presented a declaration from its general counsel. Based upon his personal knowledge, he averred that the company was…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · August 29, 2017 · in the opinion
South v. Chevron Corp. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2017)
…276 \[2011\] \[internal quotation marks omitted\]). Because the subject release is governed by the law applicable to Jones Act claims and general maritime law, the responsibility is Texaco's to establish the enforceability of the release…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 12, 2007 · in the opinion
Bradley v. Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation (2007)
…to establish their safety and warning-related activities were under the requisite direction of a federal officer. Federal direction requires "more than \general auspices' of a federal officer, or participation in a regulated industry." Savoie v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 17, 2018 · in the opinion
Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2018)
…and consortium. Id. \[25\] The Green court recognized a narrow exception to the general rule against recovery for premarital injuries in toxic exposure cases, where the injured spouse does not or cannot know of the injury…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 1, 2023 · in the opinion
Chenet v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (2023)
…misplaced. Unlike in Thomas, the trial court judge made only a general statement regarding potential appellate court reversal —the trial court commented that this court had reversed his prior decisions in other unrelated cases. Likewise, the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · February 24, 1981 · in the opinion
Austin v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1981)
…Counts V and VI seek contribution or indemnification by BIW for any damages plaintiff may recover against Armstrong Cork. II BIW's motion for summary judgment presents three general issues: (1) Do the allegations of wilful…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · January 18, 1979 · in the opinion
Weinberg v. Johns-Manville Prods. Corp. (1979)
…situation in which the parties have appeared and entered into opposition by virtue of the pleadings. As a general rule, the relevance of this procedural aspect to the situation where the movant has exclusive knowledge impels…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · April 15, 2024 · in the opinion
Perkins v. United States (2024)
…known or potential error rate, and general acceptance." Elosu at 1024 (internal citations omitted). These reliability factors are nonexclusive — "the trial court has discretion to decide how to test an expert's reliability based on the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 7, 2025 · in the opinion
LeBOEUF v. Huntington Ingalls, Incorporated (2025)
…to be addressing a different complaint in a previous case. Avondale argues for instance that summary judgment should be denied because plaintiff "asserts general negligence against Avondale, seeking to impose liability for Avondale's use and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · March 18, 1987 · in the opinion
Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. US (1987)
…a trail longer and broader than Judge Gignoux's. To understand the First Circuit's approach to the matter, it will be useful to refer briefly to the general structure of LHWCA. Complementing the Jones Act…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 6, 2024 · in the opinion
Lagrange v. Eagle, Inc. (2024)
…Lockheed Martin Corp., 990 F.3d 852, 859 (5th Cir. 2021) ("unlike the general removal statute, the federal officer removal statute is to be \broadly construed' in favor of a federal forum"). Nevertheless, it remains the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 12, 2023 · in the opinion
Rivet v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2023)
…to the stock-purchase agreement at the heart of this dispute have already survived a Motion to Dismiss in the Massachusetts case. See Sparta Insurance Company v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Company, 2022 WL 3214947 (D. Mass…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 31, 2018 · in the opinion
Thomas-Fish v. Aetna Steel Products Corp. (2018)
…law." Papp, 842 F.3d at 811 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). "Unlike the general removal statute, the federal officer removal statute is to be \broadly construed' in favor of a federal forum." Id. (quoting…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 26, 2020 · in the opinion
Holmes v. Bossier (2020)
…however, the Fifth Circuit created a narrow exception to this general rule. It held that an order in a separate case may be an "order" under section 1446(b)(3) when both cases involve (1) the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 27, 2024 · in the opinion
Perkins v. United States (2024)
…Government's actionable conduct. Plaintiff did not meet this burden of proof by presenting general evidence that there was asbestos work performed at H.J.'s worksite or expert testimony that H.J. would have been…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · October 23, 2020 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2020)
…Mot. Summ. J., 7, ECF No. 370). There is no indication that Delaware has adopted the product line exception to the general rule against successor liability. See, e.g., The O'Brien Corp. v. Hunt-Wesson…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · July 16, 1992 · in the opinion
Bowers v. Fibreboard Corporation (1992)
…admitted all but one of the books into evidence, apparently under a then existing exception to the hearsay rule for treatises dealing with events of general history. Appellants challenged the trial court's exclusion of the…