547 results for “General Electric”, page 28 of 28
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · March 13, 2017 · in the opinion
Signal Mutual Indemnity Association, Ltd. v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2017)
…1) to "assess the general features of the type of incident involved to determine whether the incident has a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce" and (2) to "determine whether the general character of the activity…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 31, 2021 · in the opinion
Legendre v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2021)
…Pennsylvania corporation with its place of business in Tennessee. Tutco avers that Avondale has failed to allege facts that would support either general or specific personal jurisdiction. Tutco points out that it does no business in…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · August 22, 2001 · in the opinion
Dufrene v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2001)
…this Article is heritable, but the inheritance of it neither interrupts nor prolongs the prescriptive period defined in this Article. On the other hand, the general abatement articles provide as follows: Art. 426. Transmission of action…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 2, 2007 · in the opinion
Foster Wheeler LLC v. Superior Court OF San Francisco County (2007)
…tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delays. The court concluded that limiting instructions and instructions in general to the jury would allay the defense fears of prejudice. Code of Civil Procedure section 1048, subdivision (a) provides:…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 29, 1997 · in the opinion
Mtr. OF Nyc Asbestos Litig. (1997)
…attributed to the settling defendants would have been increased and that of Carey correspondingly decreased. Such a result would clearly be damaging to the plaintiffs by reason of the application of General Obligations Law § 15-108…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 4, 1991 · in the opinion
Koker v. Armstrong Cork, Inc. (1991)
…344, 348, 693 P.2d 687 (1985): In an ordinary personal injury action, the general rule is that a cause of action "accrues" at the time the act or omission occurs. In certain torts, however, injured…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · September 30, 1983 · in the opinion
Christman v. Dravo Corp. (1983)
…232, 100 L.Ed. 133 (1956). See Director, OWCP v. Perini North River Associates, supra; Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 443 U.S. 256, 263, 99 S.Ct. 2753, 2757, 61 L.Ed.2d 621 (1979)…