57 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 3 of 3
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · May 16, 2012 · in the opinion
In re Geier (2012)
…Kaufmann, 236 A.2d 425, 427 (Del. 1967)). \[14\] See In re Asbestos Litig, 929 A.2d at 381; Schultz, C.A. No. N10C-05-218, at 3; Lluerma v. Owens Illinois Inc., C.A. No.
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · July 11, 2011 · in the opinion
Price v. EI DuPont de Nemours & Co. (2011)
…they discuss foreseeability and policy. For example, in Olivo v. Owens-Ill., Inc., the New Jersey Supreme Court held that, "to the extent Exxon Mobil owed a duty to workers on its premises for the foreseeable…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · February 21, 2012 · in the opinion
McCoy v. PolyVision Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2012)
…cases. For the reasons discussed below, the court predicts that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court would not find that a premises owner/employer owes a duty to its employee's spouse for take home asbestos exposure. Therefore…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 5, 2012 · in the opinion
Martinez v. EI DuPont De Nemours and Co. (2012)
…chemical agent manufactured by DuPont. Plaintiff also cites the Superior Court decision in Lluerma v. Owens Illinois\[90\] as support for her opposition to the Motion to Dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds. In that case…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · January 10, 1990 · in the opinion
Farrall v. AC & S. Co., Inc. (1990)
…C. § 6304(b) Pro Rata Share of Released Tortfeasors: Combustion Eng. 2% Delaware Ins. 4% Eagle Picher 10% Fibreboard 4% Owens Corn. Fib. 8% Owens-Ill. 3% Pitts. Corn. 3% Cent Cl Res. 29% \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Total Share…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 30, 2009 · in the opinion
In re Asbestos Litigation v. Adel Wiggins Group (2009)
…a colorable federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Coming Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · March 4, 2009
Riedel v. Ici Americas Inc. (2009)
…claim. Under the Restatement (Second) of Torts, an employer owes no duty to an employee's spouse absent a legally significant special relationship for a nonfeasance claim, and a party cannot argue on appeal a misfeasance…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017
Kivell v. Murphy Oil USA (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…strict liability claims brought by Sandra Kivell, so the plaintiff lost. Under Louisiana law, a premises owner owes no duty for hazards inherent in an independent contractor's work, and strict liability requires custody, meaning direction…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Kivell v. Air Prods. and Chemicals (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…is a distinction between hazards that are inherent in a defendant's premises (for which a premises owner owes a duty) and hazards inherent in an independent contractor's job (for which a premises owner does…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · August 27, 2020 · in the opinion
In re Energy Future Holdings Corp. (2020)
…amount of her claim, as well as to attach documents that show the debtor owes the debt claimed."\[121\] "Mere notice of a claim alone is not to be called an informal proof of claim ... \[instead…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 7, 2025 · in the opinion
Salvemini v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2025)
…632 (1959) (emphasis added) Kermarec held that: "the owner of a ship in navigable waters owes to all who are on board for purposes not inimical to his legitimate interests the duty of exercising reasonable care…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 31, 2016 · in the opinion
Tetteh v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. (2016)
…he has undertaken a duty which the other owes to the third person."\[38\] A plaintiff must establish that the defendant "completely undertook to perform duties," such as "maintaining safe equipment and preventing injuries," that were…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · October 27, 2010 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2010)
…Inc. (FMP). FMP now owes to Pneumo Abex the indemnity that was originally provided by Wagner in the 1994 APA. The obligations that arise from the relationship with Cooper are twofold. The first concerns a guaranty…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 30, 2020 · in the opinion
Pruitt v. Amdura (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…corporate restructuring resulting in a new entity, Aldrich Pump LLC ("Aldrich"), which now owns the former Ingersoll Rand's alleged asbestosrelated liabilities at issue in this litigation. (Id.) In addition, the notice indicates that on June…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Kivell v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…is a distinction between hazards that are inherent in a defendant's premises (for which a premises owner owes a duty) and hazards inherent in an independent contractor's job (for which a premises owner does…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · September 30, 2008 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2008)
…Mogul Products, Inc.(FMP). FMP now owes to Pneumo Abex the indemnity that was originally provided by Wagner in the 1994 APA. The obligations that arise from the relationship with Cooper are two-fold. The first…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 22, 2006 · in the opinion
Hudson v. Delmarva Power & Light Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation Hudson Trial Group, 2006)
…the control of any part of the work, is subject to liability for physical harm to others for whose safety the employer owes a duty to exercise reasonable care, which is caused by his failure to…