57 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 3 of 3
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. Caterpillar (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…products, "in the scope of \[the plaintiff's\] entire work history," should be considered in determining whether defendant's conduct was a substantial contributing factor. Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 571N.W.2d530, 533 (Mich…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · June 3, 2011 · in the opinion
Bowser v. Parker-Hannifin Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2011)
…regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked."\[23\] At least one federal circuit decision, Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., applied Lohrmann's so-called "frequency, regularity…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 30, 2009 · in the opinion
In re Asbestos Litigation v. Adel Wiggins Group (2009)
…a colorable federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Coming Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 13, 2016 · in the opinion
Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…is key to a plaintiffs claim. Id. A claim for failure to warn may be based on a theory of negligence or strict liability. O'Flynn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, 759 So. 2d 526, 535 (Miss…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 12, 2018 · in the opinion
Call v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…law in an asbestos case. The court in Harris v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, noted in affirming the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana's grant of summary judgment, that the plaintiff …
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · March 4, 2009
Riedel v. Ici Americas Inc. (2009)
…claim. Under the Restatement (Second) of Torts, an employer owes no duty to an employee's spouse absent a legally significant special relationship for a nonfeasance claim, and a party cannot argue on appeal a misfeasance…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017
Kivell v. Murphy Oil USA (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…strict liability claims brought by Sandra Kivell, so the plaintiff lost. Under Louisiana law, a premises owner owes no duty for hazards inherent in an independent contractor's work, and strict liability requires custody, meaning direction…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · June 23, 2003 · in the opinion
In re Combustion Engineering (2003)
…liquidation CE would not have the additional insurance contributions it has under the Plan, it would retain the environmental liabilities on property it owns, it would not have the note or stock being contributed by ABB…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Kivell v. Air Prods. and Chemicals (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…is a distinction between hazards that are inherent in a defendant's premises (for which a premises owner owes a duty) and hazards inherent in an independent contractor's job (for which a premises owner does…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · August 27, 2020 · in the opinion
In re Energy Future Holdings Corp. (2020)
…amount of her claim, as well as to attach documents that show the debtor owes the debt claimed."\[121\] "Mere notice of a claim alone is not to be called an informal proof of claim ... \[instead…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 7, 2025 · in the opinion
Salvemini v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2025)
…632 (1959) (emphasis added) Kermarec held that: "the owner of a ship in navigable waters owes to all who are on board for purposes not inimical to his legitimate interests the duty of exercising reasonable care…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 31, 2016 · in the opinion
Tetteh v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. (2016)
…he has undertaken a duty which the other owes to the third person."\[38\] A plaintiff must establish that the defendant "completely undertook to perform duties," such as "maintaining safe equipment and preventing injuries," that were…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · October 27, 2010 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2010)
…Inc. (FMP). FMP now owes to Pneumo Abex the indemnity that was originally provided by Wagner in the 1994 APA. The obligations that arise from the relationship with Cooper are twofold. The first concerns a guaranty…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 30, 2020 · in the opinion
Pruitt v. Amdura (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…corporate restructuring resulting in a new entity, Aldrich Pump LLC ("Aldrich"), which now owns the former Ingersoll Rand's alleged asbestosrelated liabilities at issue in this litigation. (Id.) In addition, the notice indicates that on June…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Kivell v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…is a distinction between hazards that are inherent in a defendant's premises (for which a premises owner owes a duty) and hazards inherent in an independent contractor's job (for which a premises owner does…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 22, 2006 · in the opinion
Hudson v. Delmarva Power & Light Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation Hudson Trial Group, 2006)
…the control of any part of the work, is subject to liability for physical harm to others for whose safety the employer owes a duty to exercise reasonable care, which is caused by his failure to…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 11, 2023 · in the opinion
Jordonek v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2023)
…Hennessy argues the plain words of the [\158] statute require the entry of summary judgment because it owes no duty under the statute. Plaintiff responds that the language in the statute "used by" the defendant applies…