No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

74 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 3 of 4

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · September 12, 1991 · in the opinion

    Mitchell, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty (1991)

    …Ed.2d 650 (1981); Lac D'Amiante Du Quebec v. Am. Home Assur., 613 F. Supp. 1549 (D.N.J. 1985); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 597 F. Supp. 1515 (D.D.C…

  2. Exposure sites · Maryland

    Maryland Asbestos Exposure Sites: Worksites, Industries, and Trust Coverage

    …W.R. Grace: 68 entries (Monokote spray fireproofing and Zonolite) ACandS: 62 entries (insulation contracting) Owens-Illinois: 48 entries (Kaylo pipe and block insulation) GAF: 39 entries (roofing and building products) Flintkote: 32 entries (roofing, flooring…

  3. State law · Maryland

    Maryland Mesothelioma Lawyer: Asbestos Claims, Deadlines & Compensation

    …903(b), 905(a), 933; 28 U.S.C. § 1442 — FECA, LHWCA, federal-officer removal. Cases Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia, 601 A.2d 633 (Md. 1992) — punitive damages: actual malice, clear and convincing evidence; an…

  4. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 27, 1995 · in the opinion

    ACandS, Inc. v. Asner (1995)

    …all of the other companies settled, became bankrupt, or were dismissed from the case. AC & S was dismissed from the Payne action. Appellants cross-claimed for contribution against Owens-Illinois, Inc., GAF, Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · October 15, 2019 · in the opinion

    Fullen v. 3M Company (2019)

    …s Motion to Dismiss Claim for Punitive Damages, Plaintiffs stated that Lockheed had asserted the improper standard for punitive damages in a case such as this one, and then they cited to Owens-Illinois, Inc. v…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 16, 2014 · in the opinion

    Sherin v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. (2014)

    …evidence of exposure to the defendant's asbestos. See Reiter v. Pneumo Abex, LLC, 8 A.3d 725, 729 (Md. 2010); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia, 602 A.2d 1182, 1184 (Md. 1992). \[33\] This evidence…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 9, 2005 · in the opinion

    National Union Fire Insurance Company OF Pittsburgh v. Porter Hayden Company (2005)

    …4th 645, 689 (Cal. 1995) (holding that the continuous injury trigger of coverage should be applied to third party claims of continuous or progressively deteriorating bodily injury or property damage); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 17, 2003 · in the opinion

    Garlock v. Gallagher (2003)

    …for judgment only after it "consider\[s\] all evidence and inferences in the light most favorable to the party against whom the motion is made." Md. Rule 2-519(b); see also Owens-Illinois, Inc. v…

  9. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2016 · in the opinion

    Stein v. Pfizer Inc. (2016)

    …BALTIMORE CITY AFFIRMED. COSTS TO BE PAID BY APPELLANTS. \[1\] The complaint named the following entities as defendants: Union Carbide Corporation; John Crane-Houdaille, Inc.; Owens-Illinois Glass Company; General Refractories Company; Koppers Company, Inc.; Universal…

  10. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 29, 2009 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Saville (2009)

    …judgment and for JNOV on appellee's claims. A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is evaluated the same way as a motion for judgment at close of the evidence. Owens-Illinois v. Armstrong, 87 Md…

  11. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 27, 2017 · in the opinion

    Hiett v. Ac&r Insulation Co., Inc. (2017)

    …the Court of Appeals referenced this Court's decision in Adams v. Owens-Illinois, stating that our decision applied "the same policy of avoiding expansive new duties to hold that an employer owed no duty to…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · February 24, 2015 · in the opinion

    Sroka v. Union Carbide Corp. (2015)

    …Paul Sroka, as plaintiffs. ECF No. 90-3. \[2\] The Plaintiffs also sued Union Carbide Corporation; John Crane-Houdaille, Inc.; Owens-Illinois Glass Company; E.L. Stebbing & Co., Inc.; Hampshire Industries, Inc.; Universal Refractories Company; J…

  13. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 3, 2020 · in the opinion

    Rossello v. Zurich American Insurance Company (2020)

    …Fischer, Insurance Coverage for Mass Exposure Tort Claims: The Debate Over the Appropriate Trigger Rule, 45 Drake L. Rev. 625, 652 (1997)); see Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co., 650 A.2d 974, 979 (N…

  14. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 2, 2010 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Saville (2010)

    …and for JNOV on appellee's claims. A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is evaluated the same way as a motion for judgment at close of the evidence. Owens-Illinois v. Armstrong, 87 Md.App…

  15. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · November 2, 2018 · in the opinion

    Estate of Schatz v. John Crane, Inc. (2018)

    …Id. Rather than find that the duty to warn extended by way of an intermediary, the Court instead required a relationship between the plaintiff and defendant. Cf. Adams v. Owens-Illinois, 119 Md. App. 395, 411…

  16. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 8, 2013 · in the opinion

    Georgia Pacific v. Farrar (2013)

    …Edgecombe, 384 Md. 606, 865 A.2d 603 (2005), and Adams v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 119 Md.App. 395, 705 A.2d 58 (1998), Georgia Pacific contends that: (1) the existence of a duty is determined…

  17. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · December 18, 2015 · in the opinion

    May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2015)

    …in the business of selling such a product, and (b) it is expected to and does reach the user or consumer without substantial change in the condition in which it is sold. In Owens-Illinois, Inc…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · February 27, 2014 · in the opinion

    Citrano v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. (2014)

    …between \[plaintiff\], GE, and the U.S. Navy Vessels allegedly a part of the asbestos exposure"); Covington v. Owens Illinois Glass Co., CIV.A. GLR-12-461, 2012 WL 4764883, at [\1]-[\2] (D.Md. Oct…

  19. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · October 3, 2014 · in the opinion

    May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)

    …both by Wood and by the out-of-state cases that have followed in its wake, the Mays make a series of miscellaneous arguments. We reject each of them. First, citing Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia…

  20. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · May 15, 1998

    Porter Hayden v. Bullinger (1998)

    …vacated the trial court's apportionment of damages in the Grimshaw and Granski cases, ruling for Owens Corning and Porter Hayden against the plaintiffs, and remanded for further proceedings. A trial court may not withhold from…