84 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”, page 3 of 5
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · October 15, 2019 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair (2019)
…of Mississippi law. The Lohrmann test is "a de minimis rule in that a plaintiff is required to prove more than a casual or minimal contact with the product," Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., 130 So…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Evans v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…1988). The defense is applicable to both design defect and failure to warn claims. See, e.g., MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corp., Civil Action No. 13-831-SLR-CJB, 2013 WL 6571808, at [\3] (D. Del…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 17, 2017 · in the opinion
Phillips v. Honeywell International Inc. (2017)
…at p. 86.) In Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 962 (Izell), the owner of a residential construction business was diagnosed with mesothelioma and sued more than 20 manufacturers or suppliers allegedly…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 13, 2022 · in the opinion
Barbarino v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2022)
…FLXIBLE CO.), ROLLS-ROYCE CORP. (AS SUCCESSOR TO ALLISON ENGINE CO.), THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO., UNION CARBIDE CORP., BOSTIK INC, INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS(F/K/A THE CARBORUNDUM CO), SAINT-GOBAIN ABRASIVES INC, ALLISON TRANSMISSION INC…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 2016 · in the opinion
Watkins v. Affinia Group (2016)
…that "\[t\]he Helsinki Criteria does not articulate principles for distinguishing which particular \occupational, domestic or environmental exposure\[s\] to asbestos' caused the disease." Id., quoting Butler v. Union Carbide Corp., 310 Ga.App. 21, 27…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Johnson v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2017)
…evidence of exposure in asbestos personal injury cases. Particularly instructive is Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 962 \[180 Cal.Rptr.3d 382\] (Izell). The plaintiff ran a construction company from 1964…
-
Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · September 11, 2019 · in the opinion
Rowe v. Bell & Gossett Company (2019)
…Inc.; Trane US, Inc., as successor to American Standard Inc.; Union Carbide Corp.; Weil-McLain Company, Inc.; Compudyne Corporation, individually and as successor to York-Shipley; New Jersey Plumbing Group, LLC, d/b/a Blackman Plumbing…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 28, 2018 · in the opinion
Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2018)
…McMillan, McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant, represented by Jay Morton Jalenak, Jr., Kean Miller & Patrick Dale Roquemore, Kean Miller. Union Carbide Coporation, Defendant, represented by McGready Lewis Richeson, Pugh, Accardo, Haas, Radecker & Carey…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 24, 2011 · in the opinion
State EX rel. Roger Bacon High School v. Indus. Comm. OF Ohio (2011)
…request for a writ of mandamus. \[1\] Beazer East, Allen Refractories, Osborne Industries, A.C. Product Liability Trust, Certainteed, Dana and Union Carbide, Owens-Illinois, Riley Stoker Corp., Daimler Chrysler Corp., Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC, RPM…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · December 4, 2012 · in the opinion
Melford v. Abex Corporation (2012)
…America; Trail King Industries; Trailstar Manufacturing Corp.; Transitional Holdings Inc.; Tube City IMS; Twin Disc Inc.; Union Carbine Corp.; Utility Trailer Manufacturing Co; Wabash Nat'l Corp.; Wells Cargo Inc.; and Yamaha Motor Corp. USA. See…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 13, 2018
Nauheimer v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
Randi Nauheimer, suing individually and as executor of the estate of her husband Robert Nauheimer, brought an asbestos action against Union Carbide Corp. and other defendants in New York County. Plaintiffs moved to try that case…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 29, 2011
Adams v. Ford Motor Company (2011)
Richard Adams, a self-described shade tree mechanic, died of mesothelioma. His wife and three children sued many defendants, including Ford Motor Company. They alleged he was exposed to asbestos dust while replacing brake pads on his vehicles, five…
-
Court case · New York Court of Appeals · October 27, 2005 · in the opinion
Holdampf v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Matter of Nyc Asbestos Litig, 2005)
…by its employee's family member, allegedly as a result of exposure to toxins brought home from the workplace on the employee's work clothes (see also Ruffing v Union Carbide Corp., 1 AD3d 339 \[2d…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · May 23, 2012 · in the opinion
Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2012)
…to which the plaintiff was exposed, coupled with evidence that the dose was a substantial factor in causing the asbestos-related disease"); Butler v. Union Carbide Corp., 310 Ga.App. 21, 712 S.E.2d 537…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 7, 2019 · in the opinion
Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2019)
…as close as possible based on the information available, a technique that other courts on the Eastern District have endorsed for exposure reconstruction assessments. See Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., No. 13-6323, 2015 WL 575315…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · September 25, 2018 · in the opinion
Doolin v. Ford Motor Company (2018)
…unquantified (and potentially infinitesimal) increase in risk could serve as proof that a defendant's product was a substantial cause of a plaintiff's or decedent's disease."); Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp., 266 F. Supp…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 11, 2021 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2021)
…Miss. 2005). This test is "a de minimis rule in that a plaintiff is required to prove more than a casual or minimal contact with the product." Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., 130 So. 3d 66…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · January 18, 2021 · in the opinion
Erhardt v. Bmw OF North America, LLC (2021)
…Aug. 16, 2018). On August 21, 2018, Union Carbide Corp. (individually and as successor to Amchem and Benjamin Foster) filed an Answer with affirmative defenses and special defenses, and cross-claims against all Defendants. Answer, ECF…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · June 9, 2021 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2021)
…Miss. 2005). This test is "a de minimis rule in that a plaintiff is required to prove more than a casual or minimal contact with the product." Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., 130 So. 3d 66…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 13, 2015 · in the opinion
Juni v. Ford Motor Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)
…Instead, the expert had testified that the plaintiff's cumulative exposure to all products contributed to causing his disease. (Butler v Union Carbide Corp., 712 SE2d 537 \[GA App 2011\]). The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals…