57 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”, page 3 of 3
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 21, 2007 · in the opinion
Frastaci v. Vapor Corporation (2007)
…section of the country they may come.' \[Citations.\] Permitting state tort claims \would generate precisely those inconsistencies in railroad safety standards that Congressional action was intended to avoid.' (Ouellette v. Union Tank Car Co. (D.Mass…
-
Industry
Asbestos Exposure in Railroad Work
…showing what asbestos they used, and the recollections of the worker and his coworkers, and railroad retirement and union records often fill in the dates and assignments. The claim is built on the railroad, the craft…
-
Court case · Alabama Supreme Court · December 20, 2002 · in the opinion
General Motors Corp. v. Kilgore (2002)
853 So.2d 171 (2002) GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION v. Charles W. KILGORE et al. December 20, 2002. Supreme Court of Alabama. [\172] Frank E. Lankford, Jr., of Huie, Fernambucq & Stewart, L.L.P., Birmingham, for appellant…
-
Court case · West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals · March 12, 2009 · in the opinion
Ratliff v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co. (2009)
…the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby resign and surrender any right to employment by Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk and Western Railway Company, Southern Railway Company or any employer affiliated with or controlled by any…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · March 2, 2010 · in the opinion
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Ray EX rel. Boyd (2010)
693 F.Supp.2d 39 (2010) CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. James T. RAY, for the Estate of Harold F. BOYD, Defendant. Civil Action No.: 07-1148 (RMU). March 2, 2010. United States District Court, District…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · July 11, 2024 · in the opinion
Wells v. BNSF Ry. Co. (2024)
…2010). "Where a tort claim would interfere with \rail transportation' or \operation' of railroad tracks or facilities, the regulation or claim is expressly preempted." Benson v. Union Pacific R. Co., 2008 WL 2946331, at [\3] (E…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Kansas · September 10, 2018 · in the opinion
Little v. Budd Co. (2018)
…630, 132 S.Ct. 1261, 182 L.Ed.2d 116 (2012) (quoting Brown v. Hotel & Rest. Emps. & Bartenders Int'l Union Local 54, 468 U.S. 491, 501, 104 S.Ct. 3179, 82 L.Ed.2d…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 3, 1998 · in the opinion
Scheiding v. General Motors Corp. (1998)
…for his asbestos injuries and for his wife's loss of consortium. Billy Umphriss was employed as an engine supplyman and fireman for the Union Pacific Railroad from 1941 through 1942 and from 1950 through 1961…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · January 25, 2021 · in the opinion
Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2021)
…5th Cir. 2020) (emphasis added) (citing Lavender v. Kurn, 327 U.S. 645, 653 (1946)); see also Standard v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., No. 98-7134, 1999 WL 992973, at [\2]-3 (10th Cir. 1999…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · September 18, 2003 · in the opinion
Anderson v. AC & S., Inc. (2003)
…in essence, granted in part the motion for summary judgment of defendants-appellees, Norfolk & Western Railway Company, Norfolk [\395] Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Corporation, and American Financial Group. Defendants-appellees cross-appeal. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY {¶…
-
Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · February 15, 2018 · in the opinion
Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Oakes EX rel. Hagan (2018)
…holding. "To further \[the Federal Employers' Liability Act's\] humanitarian purposes, Congress did away with several common-law tort defenses that had effectively barred recovery by injured workers." \[Consolidated Rail Corporation v.\] Gottshall, 512 U.S…
-
Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · June 23, 1997 · in the opinion
Metro-North Commuter R. Co. v. Buckley (1997)
…the limited set of circumstances in which, according to this Court, the FELA permits recovery. Id., at 620; see Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Gottshall, 512 U. S. 532 (1994). The District Court did not discuss Buckley…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Kansas · February 13, 2018 · in the opinion
Little v. the Budd Company (2018)
…magistrate judge's order. When reviewing a magistrate judge's order deciding nondispositive pretrial matters, the district court applies a "clearly erroneous or contrary to law" standard of review. See First Union Mortg. Corp. v. Smith…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 23, 2023 · in the opinion
Anderson v. Consolidated Rail Corporation (2023)
…Rogers standard, stating that in only the most frivolous cases may the courts deny a FELA plaintiff his or her qualified right to a jury trial. Ciarolla v. Union Railroad Co., ... 338 A.2d 669, 671…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · September 9, 2010 · in the opinion
Kurns v. AW Chesterton Inc. (2010)
…these standards as the trains crossed state lines, or adhere to the standard of the most restrictive states. First Sec. Bank v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 152 F.3d 877, 880-81 (8th Cir.1998)…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 17, 2013 · in the opinion
Frieder v. Long Is. RR (2013)
…people left to clean the counters, clean the — you know, clean that area up so that other people could sit down." The LIRR employees who patronized the diner belonged to trade unions. They included electricians, carpenters…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · June 30, 2015 · in the opinion
Russell v. Illinois Central Railroad Company (2015)
…C.J., concurring). Judge Friendly's opinion prompted a renegotiation of the collective bargaining agreements between the nation's railroad companies and their employees' unions in 1975, resulting in the notice language quoted above. CSX Transp…