980 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 35 of 49
-
Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · November 19, 2019 · in the opinion
Whelan v. Armstrong International Inc. (2019)
…and Daniel P. Creed Co. Inc.; NMBFIL Inc., f/k/a Bondo Corp.; Owens-Illinois Inc.; Peerless Industries Inc.; Pneumo-Abex LLC, individually and as successor to Abex Corp.; Price Pfister Inc.; The Prudential Insurance Co…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 13, 2012 · in the opinion
Casey v. Perini Corporation (2012)
…to Present Sufficient Evidence to Raise a Triable Issue of Fact Regarding Causation A threshold issue in asbestos litigation is exposure to the relevant asbestos product. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 10, 2015 · in the opinion
Green v. CertainTEED Corporation (2015)
…Step One Turning to step one, California and Texas apply different standards to determine the issue of causation in asbestos litigation. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford), sets forth the "substantial…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 25, 2016 · in the opinion
Campbell v. AO Smith Corporation (2016)
…AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO ALLIANCE MACHINE COMPANY; NAGLE PUMPS, INC; OAKFABCO, INC.; OGLEBAY NORTON COMPANY, AND ITS DIVISION FERRO ENGINEERING; OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.; PHELPS DODGE INDUSTRIES, INC; POWELL VALVE COMPANY; POWER PIPING; PREMIER REFRACTORIES, INC.…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · April 16, 2018 · in the opinion
Nichols v. Allis Chalmers Product Liability Trust (2018)
… CSX Transp., Inc. v. Williams, 608 S.E.2d 208 (Ga. 2005); Adams v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 705 A.2d 58 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1998). Other jurisdictions focus on whether the risk of injury was…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 2, 2017 · in the opinion
DeLOOF v. Ace Hardware Corp. (2017)
…of a cause of action for asbestos-related latent injuries, the plaintiff must first establish some threshold exposure to the defendant's defective asbestos-containing products." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · February 21, 2012 · in the opinion
McCoy v. PolyVision Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2012)
…cases. For the reasons discussed below, the court predicts that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court would not find that a premises owner/employer owes a duty to its employee's spouse for take home asbestos exposure. Therefore…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 22, 2014 · in the opinion
Markovsky v. Crown Cork & Seal Co. (2014)
…DAP, Inc., 966 A.2d 603 (Pa.Super.2009) (en banc) (Klein, J., concurring and dissenting) and Burger v. Owens Illinois, Inc., 966 A.2d 611 (Pa.Super.2009) (en banc) (Klein, J., concurring and dissenting)…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · July 21, 2010 · in the opinion
Marchand v. Asbestos Defendants (2010)
…domicile of the corporation in that state, brought about the civil death of the corporation, and it no longer had the capacity to be sued. Owens, 21 So.2d at 491. The Court further noted: There…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2021 · in the opinion
Phipps v. Copeland Corporation LLC (2021)
…was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 25, 2012 · in the opinion
Rabovsky v. Goulds Pumps (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. VI), 2012)
…the ability to establish specific testing relating to a particular plaintiff is exceedingly problematic. See, e.g. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, 941 P.2d 1203, 16 Cal. 4th 953, 957 (Ca.1997).\[5\] It is clear…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2016 · in the opinion
Stein v. Pfizer Inc. (2016)
…Heel v. Sherman Equip., 442 N.E.2d 199, 202 (Ill.1982); see David G. Owen and Mary J. Davis, 2 Owens & Davis on Products Liability, § 16:15, at 636 (4th ed. 2014).\[15\] But, in…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · November 13, 2006 · in the opinion
Bartel EX rel. Estate, Rich v. AC Prod. Liab. Tr. (2006)
…The majority of these cases concerned shipyard workers who worked on ships while in the shipyard on land, as well as at sea.\[2\] Of these cases, only Owens-Illinois Inc. v. United States District Court…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · January 10, 2017 · in the opinion
Stallings v. Georgia Pacific Corp. (2017)
…court subsequently issues a decision contrary to our own, we are required to adopt prospectively the state decision clarifying state law. See Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co., 311 U.S. 538, 543 (1941) ("appellate tribunals…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · July 11, 2014 · in the opinion
Bostic v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. (2014)
…in Flores we discussed the California Supreme Court's decision in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.\[17\] That case described how expert testimony was presented from both sides establishing "that the plaintiffs' asbestos-related disease [\339…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2017 · in the opinion
Alfaro v. Imerys Talc America Inc. (2017)
…would need to establish that this exposure was to a reasonable medical probability a substantial factor in contributing to any asbestos-related disease she suffered. (See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 11, 2018 · in the opinion
Burkart v. PPG Industries, Inc. (2018)
…LLP, Mary Reeves Arthur, Forman, Watkins, & Krutz, LLP & Thomas Peyton Smith, Forman, Watkins, & Krutz, LLP. Owens-Illinois, Inc., doing business as O-I, Third Party Defendant, represented by Walter G. Watkins, III, Forman, Watkins & Krutz LLP…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 18, 2006 · in the opinion
Weber v. John Crane, Inc. (2006)
…the defendant with enough frequency and regularity as to show a reasonable medical probability that this exposure was a factor in causing the plaintiff's injuries. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 27, 2017 · in the opinion
Hiett v. Ac&r Insulation Co., Inc. (2017)
…the Court of Appeals referenced this Court's decision in Adams v. Owens-Illinois, stating that our decision applied "the same policy of avoiding expansive new duties to hold that an employer owed no duty to…
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · February 13, 2019 · in the opinion
Keene v. Cna Holdings, LLC (2019)
…698 S.E.2d 835, 838 (Ct. App. 2010) ("Unfair prejudice means an undue tendency to suggest a decision on an improper basis." (quoting State v. Owens, 346 S.C. 637, 666, 552 S.E.2d…