No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

197 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 4 of 10

  1. Court case · Maryland Appellate Court · February 8, 2024 · in the opinion

    Basil-Flippen v. General Electric Company (2024)

    …it is merely incorporated into something larger, the strict liability will be found to carry through to the ultimate user or consumer," rather than to the assembler. Id. In Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, 119 Md…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 21, 2016 · in the opinion

    Casey v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. Inc. (2016)

    …701.) Accordingly, we conclude excluding reference to the first jury's determination that Kaiser Gypsum was 3.5 percent at fault did not prejudice Kaiser Gypsum. White v. Ford Motor Co. (9th Cir. 2007) 500 F…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc. (2009)

    …2001) 26 Cal.4th 465, 478-479 \[110 Cal.Rptr.2d 370, 28 P.3d 116\], quoting Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256, 261 \[37 Cal.Rptr. 896, 391 P.2d 168…

  4. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · May 4, 2006 · in the opinion

    Robinson v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. (2006)

    …893 S.W.2d at 518. A. The Applicable Law. A special law is defined as one "\limited to a particular class of persons distinguished by some characteristic other than geography.'" Ford Motor Co. v. Sheldon…

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 16, 2016 · in the opinion

    Hassell v. The Budd Co. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Lit.(no. VI), 2016)

    …SBRMCOA, LLC v. Bayside Resort, Inc., 707 F.3d 267, 272-73 (3d Cir.2013) (quoting Ford Motor Co. v. Summit Motor Prods., Inc., 930 F.2d 277, 284-85 (3d Cir. 1991)). In this case…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 10, 1985 · in the opinion

    Kaminski v. Western MacArthur Co. (1985)

    …v. IRM Corporation (1985) 38 Cal.3d 454 \[213 Cal. Rptr. 213, 698 P.2d 116\]; Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256 \[37 Cal. Rptr. 896, 391 P.2d 168\]; Barth v…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · November 7, 2014 · in the opinion

    Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)

    …cases applying a "modified or adjusted" Lohrmann test in mesothelioma cases and rejecting them as inconsistent with a prediction that the North Carolina Supreme Court would adopt the Lohrmann test); see also Ford Motor Co. v…

  8. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · December 11, 2008 · in the opinion

    Braaten v. Saberhagen Holdings (2008)

    …in Simonetta, common law product liability claims like those here\[4\] are governed by the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A (1965),\[5\] adopted in Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wash.2d 522, 531-32, 452…

  9. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · November 10, 2008 · in the opinion

    Kimball v. Asbestos Corporation Ltd. (2008)

    …her\] product, and (b) the user or consumer has not bought the product from or entered into any contractual relation with the seller. \[16\] See Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wn.2d 522, 532, 452…

  10. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · January 8, 1998 · in the opinion

    Fuller-Austin Insulation Co. v. Bilder (1998)

    …covered with asbestos dust which ultimately caused Kay's death. Recovery under the strict liability doctrine is not limited to users and consumers. Darryl v. Ford Motor Co., 440 S.W.2d 630, 633 (Tex.1969)…

  11. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 29, 2008 · in the opinion

    Satterfield v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. (2008)

    …because it is applicable to a substantial class and its classifications are reasonable. A special law is limited to a particular class of persons distinguished by some [\240] characteristic other than geography. Ford Motor Co. v…

  12. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 5, 2013 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Airco Welders Supply (2013)

    …ENGINEERING, FORD MOTOR CO., FOSECO, INC., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION, GARLOCK, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GENERAL MOTORS CORP., GEORGE V. HAMILTON, INC., GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, GOULD PUMPS, INC., GREEN, TWEED & COMAPNY, INC., HAJOCA PLUMBING SUPPLY COMPANY, HARNISCHFEGER…

  13. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 3, 2008 · in the opinion

    Benard v. Eagle, Inc. (2008)

    …the general speedy manner in which this Court handles applications for rehearing when this Court is notified of the urgency of the need for prompt action. In Centanni v. Ford Motor Co., 93-1133 (La.App…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 2, 2003 · in the opinion

    Lindstrom v. AC Products Liability Trust (2003)

    …at hand and the reasoning is sound [\588] and persuasive, citation to and reliance on the unpublished opinion is appropriate. Bob Tatone Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 197 F.3d 787, 790 (6th Cir.1999)…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion

    Faddish v. Buffalo Pumps (2012)

    …distribution is that " \[t\]hey are an integral part of the overall producing and marketing enterprise that should bear the cost of injuries resulting from defective products." Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co., 61 Cal.2d 256…

  16. Court case · Utah Supreme Court · November 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Boynton v. Kennecott Utah Copper, LLC (2021)

    …E.2d at 210; In re Certified Question from Fourteenth Dist. Ct. App. of Tex. (Miller v. Ford Motor Co.), 479 Mich. 498, 740 N.W.2d 206, 214-15 (2007). For those courts, the "relationship…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · December 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Krik v. Crane Co. (2014)

    …See Schultz, 721 F.3d at 432 (recognizing that such broad opinions give rise to concerns about "an ill-defined floor"); see also Smith v. Ford Motor Co., No. 2:08-cv-630, 2013 WL 214378…

  18. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · March 23, 1984 · in the opinion

    Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)

    …protection to a rigidly literal class of "users and consumers." In Ford Motor Co. v. Cockrell, 211 So.2d 833 (Miss.1968), a city employee noticed smoke rising from the motor of an unattended city truck…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    Merrill v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2009)

    …which makes them better able to insure that the component is suitable for their specific applications. (Springmeyer v. Ford Motor Co. (1998) 60 Cal.App.4th 1541, 1554 \[71 Cal.Rptr.2d 190\].) Liability of a…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 28, 2021 · in the opinion

    Krutz v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2021)

    …testimony, fact or expert, to show that Amchem's asbestos products were a substantial factor in causing his disease. Cf. Michel v. Ford Motor Co., No. 18-4738, 2019 WL 118007, at [\3] (E.D. La…