185 results for “General Electric”, page 4 of 10
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 25, 2013 · in the opinion
Dixon v. Ford Motor Company (2013)
…Potomac Electric and held that the General Assembly did not intend for the cap to apply to awards in wrongful death actions. That ruling had a very short shelf life. In its next session, the General…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2024 · in the opinion
Williams v. JM Manufacturing Company, Inc. (2024)
…conclusion about the scope of this duty and explicitly disapproved Campbell. (Kesner, at p. 1156.) "The \general rule' of duty in California is established by statute." (Kuciemba v. Victory Woodworks, Inc. (2023) 14 Cal.5th 993…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia · February 5, 2014 · in the opinion
Amick v. Ohio Power Company (2014)
…Barbara Amick. According to Plaintiff, he worked as a bookkeeper for American Gas & Electric at OPC's Muskingum River Power Plant in 1953 and 1954, where he was exposed to asbestos that deposited on his clothing. …
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 8, 2005 · in the opinion
Zimko v. American Cyanamid (2005)
…that subjecting its employees to occupational levels of asbestos would result in harm. The general rule in Louisiana is that an employee's exclusive remedy for work-related personal injuries or occupational diseases is in workers…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 31, 2010 · in the opinion
Arnold v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2010)
…Company; Transalta Centralia Generation, LLC; Trico Contracting, Inc.; Union Carbide Corporation; General Construction Co., as successor by merger to Wright Schuchart Harbor Co.; Weyerhaeuser Company, Zurn Industries LLC; and Goulds Pumps (IPG), Inc., Respondents. No. 39055…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · October 29, 2013 · in the opinion
Bobo v. Agco Corp. (2013)
…\[and\] ... an implied restriction of the general authority is necessary to avoid grave interference with the performance of a governmental function, or that for other reasons it was plainly the purpose of Congress to use the…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 11, 2018 · in the opinion
Robaey v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2018)
…Robaey's exposure to asbestos from Fel-Pro's gaskets contributed to her developing peritoneal mesothelioma. Fel-Pro's argument misconstrues the underpinnings of plaintiffs' expert opinions as to general and specific causation. Although both Dr…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · November 5, 2003 · in the opinion
In re Sears, Roebuck and Co. (2003)
…heaters and boilers of any brand name (not just Homart), and added furnaces and heaters. Further, the lists included materials and products allegedly "associated" with these appliances, including electric elements, fittings, repair parts, accessories, pipe coverings…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Johnson v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2017)
…trucks during the relevant time period." (Italics added.) To support this argument, Johnson relies heavily on a footnote in a recent Supreme Court opinion, Webb v. Special Electric Co., Inc. (2016) 63 Cal.4th 167, 193…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 8, 2013 · in the opinion
Georgia Pacific v. Farrar (2013)
…1972, at 11321. See also Asbestos Standard for General Industry, OSHA 3095 (1995). OSHA subsequently added requirements that employers ensure that employees remove asbestos-contaminated clothing only in the change rooms and that they not be…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 27, 2014 · in the opinion
Smith v. Bmw OF North America LLC (2014)
…same vein, in Burch, the fact Sears sold an electric power mower under its own brand name, "Craftsman," weighed in favor of holding Sears liable although it was not the manufacturer of the mower. Burch v…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 13, 2017 · in the opinion
Brooks v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…to asbestos in the following manner: Ronald Brooks: (Living with Lung Cancer) Exposed to Asbestos while working as a construction worker, fireman, and during service as electrician's mate in the U.S. Navy, (1974-1989)…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 23, 2017 · in the opinion
Estate OF Brandes v. Brand Insulations, Inc. (2017)
…and Barbara cross-appeals the remittitur. We affirm the verdict and reverse the remittitur. FACTS Brand was an insulation subcontractor to general contractor Ralph M. Parsons (Parsons) during the construction phase of the ARCO Cherry Point…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 7, 2025 · in the opinion
Salvemini v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2025)
…Wrongful Death, and Loss of Consortium claims under General Maritime Law The Vessel Defendants argue that no federal court recognize a cause of action for "take-home" asbestos exposure under the Jones Act or maritime law. …
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · October 11, 2018 · in the opinion
Quisenberry v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2018)
…a stranger, was non-fatally electrocuted when he touched defendant's transformer, "\[r\]easonable care requires those using dangerous agencies to avail themselves of the best mechanical contrivances and inventions in practical use which are effectual…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 11, 2004
Goede v. Aerojet General Corporation (2004)
Stephanie Foster died of mesothelioma at age 43. Her parents and three children sued Aerojet and others for wrongful death. The opinion says that in the early 1960s her father, a machinist for Automation Progress, machined an asbestos-containing…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · August 21, 2007
Strand v. Allied Insulation Supply Co. (2007)
The Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of General Pipe Covering's third-party contribution claims against Quality Insulation and Econ Insulation, so Quality and Econ won and General Pipe lost. When settling parties invoke Pierringer…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 24, 2019
Rowland v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…Worksites: home renovation projects; Plastolite; General Motors homeowner assisting with home renovation clean-up home renovation projects 1972-1976; launderer of her husband's work clothing Plastolite; launderer of her father's work clothing General Motors
-
Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · July 16, 2015
Fletcher v. Water Applications Distribution (2015)
The Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment for Water Applications and for CertainTeed on the manufacturing-defect and general negligence claims, but reversed summary judgment for CertainTeed on Fletcher's design defect and failure-to-warn…
-
Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · October 20, 2023
Pete v. Boland Marine and Manufacturing Company, LLC (2023)
…in general damages against Ports America, reduced that award to $5,000,000, and entered total judgment of $5,551,020.70 for Pete, affirming the rest. An appellate court must consider relevant prior general damage…