112 results for “General Electric”, page 5 of 6
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois · February 21, 2018 · in the opinion
Harrow Industries LLC v. Nexus Corporation (2018)
…Defendant purchased National Greenhouse Company at some point, the general rule is that a corporation that purchases the assets of another corporation is not liable for the latter corporation's debts or liabilities. See Vernon v…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Illinois · March 9, 1987 · in the opinion
In re Unr Industries, Inc. (1987)
…what is unclear is the extent to which such noncreditors can be bound by the case in general and the plan in particular. There is no doubt that those exposed before the petition and individuals who…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · July 14, 2014 · in the opinion
Smith v. Crane Co. (2014)
…there are persuasive indications that the highest state court would decide the issue differently." Allen, 128 F.3d at 466; Clarin Corp. v. Massachusetts General Life Ins. Co., 44 F.3d 471, 474 (7th Cir. 1994)…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 27, 2014 · in the opinion
Folta v. Ferro Engineering (2014)
…it is applicable only if the injuries received are compensable, and the \line of duty' test is therefore construed as identical to the general test of compensability, \arise\[s\] out of and in the course of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · October 7, 1983 · in the opinion
Hobby v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1983)
…110, Paragraph 13-203. Paragraph 13-203 in effect overruled a long line of Illinois cases holding that actions for loss of consortium were governed by the general five year statute of limitations. In the case…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 27, 1995 · in the opinion
Hefner v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1995)
…suit was filed. While the county where the injury occurred generally has a strong interest in the outcome of litigation, this general rule does not necessarily apply to cases involving complex products liability issues. (See Mowen…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 28, 2015 · in the opinion
McALVEY v. Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC (2015)
…limited to the frequency, regularity and proximity of Plaintiff's exposure to asbestos products in general and his conclusion that Plaintiff experienced a significant exposure to asbestos based on his work activities. Finally, Defendants argue that…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · March 1, 2000 · in the opinion
Burgess v. Abex Corp. EX rel. Pneumo Abex (2000)
…787, 720 N.E.2d at 258), but did not comment on, Adcock\s statement: "A defendant who understands the general objectives of the conspiratorial scheme, accepts them, and agrees, either explicitly or implicitly\[,\] to do…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 14, 1990 · in the opinion
Owens Corning Fiberglas v. Ind. Comm'n (1990)
…(See A.O. Smith Corp., 109 Ill.2d 52, 485 N.E.2d 335; General American Life Insurance Co. v. Industrial Comm'n (1983), 97 Ill.2d 359, 454 N.E.2d 643.) That the claimant…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · January 21, 2020 · in the opinion
Krumwiede v. Tremco, Inc. (2020)
…the Mono caulk. While working with decedent, they worked in locations where insulators were present and wrapping pipes in their vicinity or general area. Schultz did not know if the insulators created any dust. Darr testified…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · November 19, 2019 · in the opinion
Amling v. Harrow Industries LLC (2019)
…These general phrases take on more concrete meaning in specific cases.\[1\] Whether the 1990 asset-purchase agreement provided that Harrow or Nexus would be liable to the Amlings for torts by National Greenhouse is such…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 14, 1994 · in the opinion
Kieffer and Co., Inc. v. Industrial Com'n (1994)
…lung condition represented a right chest mesothelioma with possible branchioplexopathy. Dr. Dosh sent decedent to Dr. Curtis Marder for a second opinion about an open pleural biopsy at Marquette General Hospital (MGH). Dr. Marder wanted Dr…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 10, 2018 · in the opinion
Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2018)
…affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. General Casualty Insurance Co. v. Lacey, 199…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 18, 1994 · in the opinion
Costa v. Dresser Industries, Inc. (1994)
…246 N.E.2d 269.) The general rule as to statements made by counsel in opening statement that certain evidence will be introduced is that such statements are not improper if made in good faith and…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 24, 2020 · in the opinion
Linder v. AW Chesterton Co. (2020)
…of personal jurisdiction, arguing that it is a Georgia corporation with its principal place of business in Georgia and had no contacts with Illinois to subject it to the circuit court's general jurisdiction. As to…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · October 29, 2008 · in the opinion
Dukes v. Pneumo Abex Corporations (2008)
…study. When Saranac's 1948 report showed findings of cancer and tumors, those companies forced Saranac to remove the references before publication. In 1935, the general counsel of J-M convinced a researcher, Dr. A.J…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion
Krik v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2017)
…our holding in this case, we note that in general investigating a sitting juror is fraught with danger — such an investigation could be seen by the juror as intimidation or harassment. Such an investigation might lead…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 22, 2011 · in the opinion
In re Estate OF Holmes v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2011)
…720 N.E.2d at 258. However, a defen-dant who understands the general objectives of the conspiracy, accepts them, and agrees either explicitly or implicitly to further those objectives is liable as a conspirator." Dukes…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · April 11, 2022 · in the opinion
Lishman v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)
…these reasons, Alfa Laval did not waive personal jurisdiction. The Court next turns to the merits of the personal jurisdiction defense. As discussed, personal jurisdiction is either general or specific. See Ford Motor Co. v. Montana…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 7, 2021 · in the opinion
Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2021)
…marks omitted.) Id. In contrast, a defendant who understands the general objectives of a conspiratorial scheme and agrees to do its part to further those objectives is liable as a conspirator. Id. ¶ 13 Because a conspiracy…