No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

3,672 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 5 of 184

  1. Company document · Union Carbide documents · September 2000

    Union Carbide Chemical & Plastics Co.'s Responses to Plaintiffs' Request for Disclosure in Moake v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (2000)

    Union Carbide Chemical & Plastics Co., Inc.'s responses to plaintiffs' request for disclosure in Cause No. 90G2055, Moake v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., et al., filed in the 239th District Court, Brazoria County, Texas. The responses…

  2. Company document · Union Carbide documents · September 1, 2000

    Powers & Frost, L.L.P. (Sharla J. Frost) to Brazoria County District Clerk Jerry Deere Transmitting Defendants' Pretrial Filings and Exhibit Lists, Moake v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (2000)

    …eleven defense pretrial filings in Cause No. 90G2055, Moake v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., et al. Behind it are the Defendants' Exhibit List pleading with signature and certificate of service, and the CCR Defendants' general exhibit…

  3. Company document · Union Carbide documents · June 6, 2001

    Union Carbide's Third Amended Answers to Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admission in Rehak v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (Werzecha), Seadrift Facility (2001)

    Union Carbide's third amended responses and objections to plaintiff's first set of interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admission in Cause No. 98-4-13362, Calhoun County, Texas. The responses address asbestos-containing…

  4. Company document · Union Carbide documents · September 1, 2000

    Defendants' General List of Medical, State-of-the-Art, Economic, Liability and Damage Experts, Moake v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (2000)

    Defendants' expert witness designation filed in Cause No. 90G2055, Moake et al. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation et al., in the 239th Judicial District Court, Brazoria County, Texas. It lists about 70 numbered medical, pathology, state…

  5. Company document · Union Carbide documents · May 30, 2001

    Union Carbide's Second Amended Answers to Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admission, Rehak v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (Seadrift Facility) (2001)

    Union Carbide's second amended responses and objections in Eugene A. Rehak et al. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. et al. (Calhoun County, Texas), answering plaintiff Werzecha's interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admission…

  6. Company document · Union Carbide documents · August 2000

    Union Carbide's Responses to Plaintiff Rafael W. Hany's First Request for Admissions and Second Request for Production, Jacobs v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Calhoun County, Texas (2000)

    Union Carbide's written responses in a Calhoun County, Texas asbestos suit to Plaintiff Rafael W. Hany's First Request for Admissions and Second Request for Production. It sets out general objections and a preliminary statement, then answers…

  7. Company document · Union Carbide documents

    Union Carbide's Second Supplemental Responses to Plaintiffs' Second Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production, Ketchum v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (Cameron County, Texas)

    …responses and objections to the plaintiff's second set of interrogatories (Nos. 1-27) and requests for production (Nos. 1-44) in Melvin Ketchum v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., et al., No. 97-08-5722-D…

  8. Company document · Union Carbide documents · September 2000

    Defendants' List of Potential Deposition and Trial Testimony, Moake v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Brazoria County, Texas (2000)

    …90G2055, Weldon R. Moake et al. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation et al. It lists prior deposition and trial testimony of witnesses, mostly physicians, from other Texas and California asbestos cases that the defendants may use…

  9. Company document · Union Carbide documents · August 2000

    Union Carbide's Responses to William J. King's First Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admissions, Jacobs v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (2000)

    Union Carbide's discovery responses in Cause No. 97-4-13222, James Paul Jacobs et al. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation et al., 267th District Court, Calhoun County, Texas, answering plaintiff William J. King's interrogatories…

  10. Company or organization · People and organizations

    Owens Corning Fiber Glass Corp

  11. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · October 24, 1995

    Consorti v. Owens Corning (1995)

    …York Court of Appeals answered the Second Circuit's certified question in the negative, so Frances Consorti had no loss of consortium claim against Owens-Corning, which prevailed on that question. In toxic substance exposure cases…

  12. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 21, 1995

    Jadlowski v. Owens Corning (1995)

    The Appellate Division reversed the punitive damages award (as remitted to $2,500,000 from a $15,000,000 jury verdict) against Owens-Corning and remanded for a new trial on punitive damages, rejecting the plaintiff…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 12, 1998

    Arena v. Owens Corning Corp. (1998)

    … it remanded for allocation of noneconomic damages between Owens Corning and ACL and otherwise affirmed the judgment for Arena. A supplier of raw asbestos is subject to strict products liability and the consumer expectations test of…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · August 8, 1991

    Kulzer v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. (1991)

    The Second Circuit reversed the judgment for the plaintiff against Owens-Corning Fiberglas and remanded with instructions to dismiss the complaint as time-barred, because the revival statute's exception applied. Under New York's 1986…

  15. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 28, 1997

    Mavroudis v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. (1997)

    The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment for the Mavroudis plaintiffs against Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. and affirmed the trial court's finding that the pretrial settlements were reasonable. In multi-supplier asbestos cases where the…

  16. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · September 30, 1998

    Pustejovsky v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (1998)

    The court affirmed summary judgment for Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Pittsburgh Corning and Rapid-American, holding the widow's mesothelioma claim was barred by limitations because it accrued in 1982 with the asbestosis diagnosis. Under Texas's…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 30, 2004

    Cadlo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2004)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment for Owens-Illinois, upholding the demurrer to the fraud, misrepresentation and concert-of-action claims and the summary judgment on the product claims, against plaintiffs Anthony and Maxlyn Cadlo…

  18. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · June 30, 1992

    Feldman v. Owens-Illinois (In re Brooklyn Navy Yard Asbestos Litigation, 1992)

    Workers at the Brooklyn Navy Yard, and families of those who died, sued makers of asbestos insulation products for diseases including lung cancer, colon cancer, mesothelioma, laryngeal cancer, pleural disease and asbestosis. The jury, in a joint…

  19. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 7, 1992

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Armstrong (1992)

    The Court of Appeals of Maryland affirmed the compensatory verdicts for workers Armstrong and Wood against Owens-Illinois, but reversed the punitive damages awards and remanded for new trials limited to punitive damages. A trial judge…

  20. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · December 12, 1990 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Edwards (1990)

    573 So.2d 704 (1990) OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.; Pittsburgh Corning Corp.; Hopeman Brothers, Inc.; Manville Corp. Asbestos Disease Compensation Fund; Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. and Dmn Electric Supply Co., Inc. v. Charles Gavin EDWARDS. No. 90…