131 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”, page 5 of 7
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 7, 2019 · in the opinion
Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2019)
…as close as possible based on the information available, a technique that other courts on the Eastern District have endorsed for exposure reconstruction assessments. See Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., No. 13-6323, 2015 WL 575315…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · September 25, 2018 · in the opinion
Doolin v. Ford Motor Company (2018)
…unquantified (and potentially infinitesimal) increase in risk could serve as proof that a defendant's product was a substantial cause of a plaintiff's or decedent's disease."); Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp., 266 F. Supp…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 11, 2021 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2021)
…Miss. 2005). This test is "a de minimis rule in that a plaintiff is required to prove more than a casual or minimal contact with the product." Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., 130 So. 3d 66…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · January 18, 2021 · in the opinion
Erhardt v. Bmw OF North America, LLC (2021)
…Aug. 16, 2018). On August 21, 2018, Union Carbide Corp. (individually and as successor to Amchem and Benjamin Foster) filed an Answer with affirmative defenses and special defenses, and cross-claims against all Defendants. Answer, ECF…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · June 9, 2021 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2021)
…Miss. 2005). This test is "a de minimis rule in that a plaintiff is required to prove more than a casual or minimal contact with the product." Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., 130 So. 3d 66…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 13, 2015 · in the opinion
Juni v. Ford Motor Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)
…Instead, the expert had testified that the plaintiff's cumulative exposure to all products contributed to causing his disease. (Butler v Union Carbide Corp., 712 SE2d 537 \[GA App 2011\]). The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 15, 2016 · in the opinion
DePREE v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2016)
…suppliers, jury could not infer without speculating that plaintiff was exposed to Union Carbide's joint compound as opposed to joint compound from other manufacturers, despite proof that Union Carbide joint compound was present at plant\]…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 24, 2015 · in the opinion
Quiroz v. BNSF Railway Company (2015)
…4th at p. 1084; see also Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 962, 968-969 (Izell)\["\In the context of a cause of action for asbestos-related latent injuries, the plaintiff must…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · September 16, 2020 · in the opinion
Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2020)
…any individualized analysis of his level of asbestos exposure"). \[7\] Some courts have also rejected a distinction between the "each and every" exposure and "cumulative" exposure theories. See Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp., 266 F. Supp…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 17, 2018 · in the opinion
Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2018)
…studies linking secondary asbestos exposure with the onset of asbestos disease. (See Castleman Dep. at 19:19-21.) Additionally, Union Pacific urges the court to follow Hoyt v. Lockheed Shipbuilding Co., C12-1648TSZ, 2013 WL 3270371…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · August 10, 2018
Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec LLC (2018)
Patrick Jack developed pleural mesothelioma and died. His family sued several companies, including Ford, Borg-Warner, Honeywell, Ingersoll Rand and Dana's successor DCo. They alleged he was exposed to asbestos in the Navy, at the Puget Sound Naval…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 9, 2009
Ransford v. Griffin Wheel Company, Inc. (2009)
…and Carrillo decisions bind the court. Trial Procedure and Discovery; Federal Preemption Worksites: Union Pacific and Southern Pacific railroads repairing and replacing brakes on locomotives and rolling stock Union Pacific and Southern Pacific railroads 39 years
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 30, 2015
Smith v. Illinois Central R. Co. (2015)
…harmless where the plaintiff's case relied on dust from the neighboring UNARCO plant. Causation; FELA Railroad Claims; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Unarco (Union Asbestos & Rubber Company) Bloomington plant; Bloomington rail yard; Bloomington rail yard…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · April 15, 2015
Stellar v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2015)
…Liability, and Workers' Compensation; Venue, Removal and Transfer; Wrongful Death and Survival; Loss of Consortium; Federal Preemption Worksites: Mack Trucks facility; Mack Trucks facility, Allentown, Allentown steelworker; union bargaining unit member Mack Trucks facility, Allentown Allentown
-
Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · May 1, 2018
Penegar v. United Parcel Service (2018)
…containing brakes and compressed air to blow off dust. Later he held other jobs: driving a van for Union County and working for a church and a school system. He had also served in the Navy…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · September 8, 2015 · in the opinion
Estenson v. Caterpillar Inc. (2015)
…determination of the admissibility of expert testimony is within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion." Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co., 142 Wn.2d 654…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · December 1, 2016 · in the opinion
Kesner v. Superior Court and Haver (2016)
…by recommendations from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and from an Advisory Committee on Asbestos Standards composed of two employer and two labor representatives, plus a representative of the public (Industrial Union, supra…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 2, 2016 · in the opinion
Whelan v. Armstrong Int'l (2016)
…warn. III. We review orders granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the trial court. Templo Fuente De Vida Corp. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, 224 N.J. 189…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 19, 2017 · in the opinion
Aquitato v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…contractors who scored, snapped, sanded and installed asbestos-containing floor tiles. Roger Sahm: (Deceased Mesothelioma) Exposed to asbestos while working as a union carpenter and building maintenance from 1957-2001. Replaced asbestos containing tiles, repaired building…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 13, 2017 · in the opinion
Brooks v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…performed on the ship by other crewmen (1952-54). Also exposed to asbestos containing products while working as a union insulator in commercial buildings and powerhouses, by chipping off old insulation and mixing dry powder cement…