123 results for “General Electric”, page 6 of 7
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 23, 2020 · in the opinion
Pearsons v. Heidelberg USA (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…on the mouthpiece. This process also caused him to breathe in asbestos dust.\[2\] Mr. Pearsons also performed general maintenance on the Linotype and cleaned the room where the machine was located. Mr. Pearsons swept dust…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 26, 2019 · in the opinion
Weddle v. BP Amoco Chemical Company (2019)
…85 A.3d at 80. \[14\] Id. at 78. \[15\] Delaware recognizes the validity of general releases in relation to personal injury claims, which "are executed to resolve the claims the parties know about as well…
-
Court case · Delaware Court of Chancery · January 11, 2018 · in the opinion
Aiu Insurance Company v. Philips Electronics North America Corporation (2018)
…fact made by a party during judicial proceedings. . . are termed \judicial admissions.'" In general, judicial admissions are "conclusive and binding both upon the party against whom they operate, and upon the court."); In re Gardner Denver…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Kivell v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…a United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that the Smtih court expanded the general land owner duty to include that a land owner "had a duty to take reasonable steps to…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · February 19, 2003 · in the opinion
In re Usg Corp. (2003)
…In In re USG Corporation, one sees these general truths played out in detail. The debtors argues that "\[t\]he vast majority of asbestos personal injury suits filed today are meritless nonmalignant claims of minor pleural…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · October 7, 2011 · in the opinion
In re ACandS, Inc. (2011)
…filed),\[12\] or a ballot is filed with respect to the plan of reorganization,\[13\] the details of the putative creditor's interests have been kept from general public view to [\98] retain and protect privacy…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 6, 2023 · in the opinion
Roadarmel v. Curtiss-Wright Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2023)
…at 322. The Defendant does not identify which counts of the complaint should arguably be dismissed and refers only to general descriptions of them as "ancillary" or "incidental." (D.I. 26 at 14) In arguing for…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion
Evans v. Flowserve US Inc. (2017)
…must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 21, 2017 · in the opinion
Tallman v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…by Mr. Tallman. (D.I. 97 at 5-7) Plaintiff's references to general block exposure do not assist the court in determining to which specific components Mr. Tallman was exposed. (See D.I. 91 at…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 14, 2022 · in the opinion
McLaughlin v. C&d Contractors (2022)
…interpret the Act liberally to effectuate its remedial objective.\[35\] This liberal interpretation recognizes that the General Assembly passed the Act for the express purpose of benefitting the worker and requires the Court to resolve any…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 25, 2019 · in the opinion
Johansen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…Holdings, 198 P.3d 493 (Wash. 2008) recognized the general rule that "a manufacturer does not have an obligation to warn of the dangers of another manufacturer's product." Braaten, 198 P.3d at 501. Therefore…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 14, 2006 · in the opinion
In re Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (2006)
…amount of the claim, and "there are no other limitations on the court's authority to evaluate the claim save those general principles which should inform all decisions made pursuant to the Code." Id. at 136.…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · May 16, 1985 · in the opinion
Sheppard v. AC & S. Co. (1985)
…Daum on May 24, 1982. On the other hand, the defendants' position is [\1130] that the cause of action is time-barred due to presence of general symptoms, namely, shortness of breath, as early as 1974…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · May 10, 2017 · in the opinion
Harris v. Deere & Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…them on machinery or sold them through the Deere network of independent dealers as Genuine John Deere parts." Plaintiff also submitted a document titled "Instruction and Parts List for John Deere General Purpose Tractor" from 1940…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · December 21, 2012 · in the opinion
In re the Flintkote Company (2012)
…depends upon (i) whether under state law a corporation is permitted to bring an alter ego claim; and (ii) "whether the claim is a general claim that is common to all creditors." Rosener v. Majestic Mgmt.…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 31, 2020 · in the opinion
Petit v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…testimony of Craig Mountz, AMMCO's corporate representative. The New York Times article highlights the use of asbestos in the industry in general, but does not aid Plaintiff in satisfying the Sweredoski standard. The Mountz testimony…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · December 21, 2012 · in the opinion
In re Flintkote Co. (2012)
…depends upon (i) whether under state law a corporation is permitted to bring an alter ego claim; and (ii) "whether the claim is a general claim that is common to all creditors." Rosener v. Majestic Mgmt.…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · February 3, 2023 · in the opinion
C&d Contractors, Inc. v. McLaughlin (2023)
…The "Reasonable" Fees In determining a reasonable amount of attorneys' fees, the factors set forth in the Delaware Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct\[10\] and the Delaware Supreme Court's holding in General Motors Corp. v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 7, 2019 · in the opinion
Rogers v. Asbestos Corp. Limited (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…2d 1116 (Del. Super. 1986). It is well-established that a plaintiff does not meet his burden of proof by simply placing the product at the general work site. Conway v. A.C.& S, C.A…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · March 1, 2013 · in the opinion
In re Motions for Access OF Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC (2013)
…regardless of their motive for inspecting such records. Thus, the press has no greater right of access than does the general public, and more importantly, an intervenor who is also a litigant in a collateral proceeding…