No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

135 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 6 of 7

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 13, 2015 · in the opinion

    Juni v. Ford Motor Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)

    …upon a fair interpretation of the evidence that no valid line of reasoning or set of permissible inferences exist that would permit the jurors to arrive at the verdict reached." (Zalinka v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.…

  2. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 2016 · in the opinion

    Watkins v. Affinia Group (2016)

    …from 1957 to 1958, where he was exposed to rolls of asbestos insulation and asbestos pipe covering. Owens Corning Fiberglass sold the insulation to the Babcock facility while Glenn worked there. The insulation, known as "Kaylo…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2012 · in the opinion

    Shields v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)

    …strictly liable for failure to warn of risks arising from other manufacturers' products — the court began with the general rule formulated in its decision in Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. Caterpillar (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …products, "in the scope of \[the plaintiff's\] entire work history," should be considered in determining whether defendant's conduct was a substantial contributing factor. Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 571N.W.2d530, 533 (Mich…

  5. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · June 3, 2011 · in the opinion

    Bowser v. Parker-Hannifin Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2011)

    …regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked."\[23\] At least one federal circuit decision, Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., applied Lohrmann's so-called "frequency, regularity…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 13, 2016 · in the opinion

    Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)

    …is key to a plaintiffs claim. Id. A claim for failure to warn may be based on a theory of negligence or strict liability. O'Flynn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, 759 So. 2d 526, 535 (Miss…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …of such a nature as to raise a reasonable inference that \[s\]he inhaled asbestos fibers that emanated from it.'" Wilson, 807 A.2d at 923 (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 1999 Pa. Super…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …nature upon which a jury can make the necessary inference that there is a causal connection between a defendant's action and a plaintiff's injury." Prekler v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 60 F.3d 824…

  9. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · December 2, 2004 · in the opinion

    Holdampf v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2004)

    …the defendants' motions for summary judgment, and the defendants based their appellate argument on the Widera rationale that an employer owes no duty of care to non-employees for injuries occurring off-premises (id. at 752)…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 15, 2015 · in the opinion

    Soto v. BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. (2015)

    …that it was more likely than not that Medina was exposed to asbestos at ASARCO. Plaintiffs argue that Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650 \[33 Cal.Rptr.2d 702\] (Dumin)…

  11. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 7, 2005

    Brown v. Crown Cork & Seal Company (2005)

    Owen Brown, diagnosed with mesothelioma in October 2002, sued several companies, including Honeywell International, the successor to Bendix Corporation. He claimed he was exposed to asbestos from Bendix brake products while working at a service station…

  12. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 20, 2012

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Fields (2012)

    …the plaintiff's injury; inference, unverified allegations, or settled status alone are not enough. An employer owes no duty for take-home exposure, so it bears no allocable fault. Causation; Product Identification; Expert Testimony; Take-Home…

  13. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 20, 2019 · in the opinion

    Rosen v. Genuine Parts Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state (CPLR § 302\[a\]\[1\]…

  14. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · May 12, 2017 · in the opinion

    Stockton v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    …tenet of negligence law, stating that "Tennessee law currently provides that one owes a duty to refrain from engaging in conduct that creates an unreasonable and foreseeable risk of harm to others." Satterfield, 266 S.W…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · June 3, 2015 · in the opinion

    Spychalla v. Boeing Aerospace Operations Inc. (2015)

    …airworthiness status of an aircraft. (ECF Nos. 111-3 through 111-5, ¶ 5.) He explains that "Boeing owns or controls all manufacturing specifications for all Boeing aircraft\[,\]" (ECF No. 111-3, ¶ 6), and provides similar statements…

  16. Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · February 29, 2012 · in the opinion

    Kurns v. Railroad Friction Products Corp. (2012)

    …Courtney C.T. Horrigan, David J. Bird, Robert H. Owen, Reed Smith LLP, Pittsburgh, PA, for Railroad Friction Products Corp. [\1262] Syllabus\[\\] George Corson worked as a welder and machinist for a railroad carrier. After retirement…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · April 15, 2015 · in the opinion

    Stellar v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2015)

    …585 Pa. 335, 888 A.2d 740, 746 (2005). Whether a defendant owes a duty of care to a plaintiff is a question of law in Pennsylvania. Kleinknecht v. Gettysburg Coll., 989 F.2d 1360, 1366…

  18. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · September 16, 2024 · in the opinion

    Sorrentino v. Ammco Tools, Inc. (2024)

    …industry custom or feasibility of design can be considered when the plaintiff opens the door by "present\[ing\] evidence that puts in issue the custom of the industry or feasibility of alternative design" as "the defendant…

  19. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · June 20, 2018 · in the opinion

    Bechtel Corporation v. Batchelor (2018)

    …possession and control of all or part of the plant such that it owed Mr. Batchelor the same duty that a landowner owes an invitee under the law of premises liability. For the reasons explained below…

  20. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · May 12, 2009 · in the opinion

    Tatera v. FMC Corp. (2009)

    …421 N.W.2d 835 (in general, one who hires an independent contractor owes no duty to the independent contractor's employees for the torts of their employer). The Wagner court held that employees of a…