163 results for “General Electric”, page 7 of 9
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 6, 2013 · in the opinion
Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2013)
…Landry's and Mr. Grisaffe's testimony are uncontradicted. Historically, latent disease cases in general and asbestos in particular, such as this one, the plaintiff has an extraordinary challenge of gathering evidence dating back 30 to…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · December 30, 1985 · in the opinion
Martin v. American Petrofina, Inc. (1985)
…Anderson, the insulation contractor, testified that as a general rule, a mastics insulation job could be expected to last five to ten years before it began to break down by becoming brittle and cracking. D.A…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · November 7, 2014 · in the opinion
Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)
…infrequent." Even when taken together with the plaintiffs' evidence of Mr. Logan's general job duties and the large number of Powell valves on site, this is insufficient to draw an inference of exposure from Powell…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 2, 2022 · in the opinion
Viglietta v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (2022)
…that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness (general causation) and that plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness (specific causation) (internal citations omitted)" (Nemeth v Brenntag North…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 29, 1988 · in the opinion
Pecorino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1988)
…accrued to him not later than 1980. Furthermore, it should be noted that when the release was signed the Pecorinos did think about any exclusions or exceptions from the general, full and final release [\570] when…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Torres (2019)
…439 S.W.3d 332, 352 (Tex. 2014). Appellants do not dispute general causation. That is, they do not dispute that asbestos is capable of causing mesothelioma. However, each appellant argues that Oscar failed to establish…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 11, 2009 · in the opinion
Vanaman v. Dap, Inc. (2009)
…limits the asbestos-related liability of Pennsylvania corporations when that liability arises from a merger or consolidation. In general, the Statute caps the successor corporation's asbestos-related liability at the fair market value of the…
-
Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · November 9, 2006 · in the opinion
Correll v. EI DuPont de Nemours & Co. (2006)
…would result in the elimination of the Social Security credit passed by the General Assembly in death cases. The General Assembly determined that persons over 60 had restricted periods for recovery and reduced benefits based upon…
-
Court case · New York Court of Appeals · June 27, 2007 · in the opinion
Reynolds v. Garlock Sealing Technologies (Mtr OF Eighth Jud. Dist. Asbestos Litigation, 2007)
…441, 444 \[Utah 1989\]; Ratterree v Bartlett, 238 Kan 11, 29, 707 P2d 1063, 1076 \[1985\]; General Motors Corp. v Lahocki, 286 Md 714, 723-733, 410 A2d 1039, 1044-1048 \[1980\]; Ward v Ochoa, 284…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 3, 2023 · in the opinion
Wright v. 3M Co. (2023)
…jury on "known and obvious" dangers pursuant to § 343A of Restatement (Second) of Torts in light of the evidence presented at trial. ANALYSIS A. General principles regarding premises liability, jury instructions, and the standard of review …
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion
Nolen v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2012)
…or 1975. Again, Ay's general testimony that manufacturers, including Foster Wheeler, specified the use of asbestos insulation up until 1971 does not lead to a reasonable inference that asbestos was specified by Foster Wheeler at…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 26, 2019 · in the opinion
Weddle v. BP Amoco Chemical Company (2019)
…85 A.3d at 80. \[14\] Id. at 78. \[15\] Delaware recognizes the validity of general releases in relation to personal injury claims, which "are executed to resolve the claims the parties know about as well…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 7, 2014 · in the opinion
Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)
…477 U.S. at 257. The moving defendants principally challenge the plaintiffs' evidence of exposure and causation as a general matter without distinguishing between the causes of action. In a case where the plaintiff developed asbestosis…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 12, 2022 · in the opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty v. Ulbricht (2022)
…s or early 80's. I don't have a number for it all I can find is it looks like we had a \[General Liability\] policy with U.S.F.&G. I called the Traveler…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Beckering v. Shell Oil Company (2017)
…an employee of Shell and he performed work under Shell's direct and unfettered control. Beckering further argued that application of the Rowland factors did not support an exception to the general duty of reasonable care…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · July 16, 2014 · in the opinion
Sarradet v. the Dow Chemical Company (2014)
…general administrative responsibility for performance of some function of the employment. He must have a personal duty towards the injured plaintiff, breach of which specifically has caused the plaintiff's damages. If the defendant's general…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · August 3, 2021 · in the opinion
Viale v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2021)
…Benicia refinery in a way that affirmatively contributed to Ronald's injuries: at best, the evidence establishes that Exxon exercised general supervision over the work of the independent contractors for whom Ronald worked. See Hooker v…
-
Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · April 13, 1999 · in the opinion
Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)
…regard to either theory. The facts presented in this case show that H & V and Lorillard had a much closer relationship than that of a general component part manufacturer supplying parts to an end product manufacturer…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Kivell v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…a United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that the Smtih court expanded the general land owner duty to include that a land owner "had a duty to take reasonable steps to…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 3, 2021 · in the opinion
Steib v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2021)
…defendants; Marathon's motion stated that it was joining the motions, in general, "to the extent that said motions and memorandum do not conflict with Marathon's defenses in this matter." As to Parsons' motion, in…