185 results for “General Electric”, page 8 of 10
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 21, 2022 · in the opinion
Sentilles v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2022)
…b). II. ANALYSIS Rule 54(b) is an exception to the general rule that a final judgment is appealable only after the adjudication of the rights and liabilities of all parties to a proceeding. Westmoreland v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · October 21, 2022 · in the opinion
Reulet v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)
…Plaintiffs have produced two copies of a purported Certificate Of Insurance (the "COI") showing that Eagle Asbestos was insured by American during the Policy Period under a Comprehensive General Liability Policy (GL) numbered K-230-9953…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 4, 2012 · in the opinion
Bettencourt v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)
…plaintiffs' injuries. I. Standard of Review A motion for judgment on the pleadings is analogous to a general demurrer. (Ludgate, supra, 82 Cal.App.4th at p. 602.) Like a general demurrer, it tests the sufficiency…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas · March 21, 2011 · in the opinion
In re Placid Oil Company (2011)
…form of notice Placid was required to give the Post-Confirmation Tort Claimants to satisfy due process requirements and ultimately discharge their claims. In general, for unknown creditors whose identities and claims are not reasonably ascertainable…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 11, 1998 · in the opinion
McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)
…even though both individuals deny it. In any event, plaintiffs do not rely solely upon parallel action to prove their cases. A defendant who understands the general objectives of the conspiratorial scheme, accepts them, and agrees…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 11, 2022 · in the opinion
Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)
…a genuine issue exists. See id. at 324. The prior version of article 2315.3 of the Civil Code provided that: "In addition to general and special damages, exemplary damages may be awarded, if it is…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996 · in the opinion
Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)
…is one of the four plaintiffs in the wrongful death action of Mary Hansen. [\761] (5) "The general rule is that \an appeal reviews the correctness of a judgment as of the time of its rendition…
-
Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 21, 1999 · in the opinion
McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)
…could look beyond these problems, I still would not agree with the majority's decision. A defendant is liable as a conspirator where he understands the general objectives of the conspiratorial scheme, accepts them, and agrees…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 28, 2022 · in the opinion
Matherne v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2022)
…and the National Conference of Insurance Guaranty Funds, and published the claims filing procedure in the newspaper of general circulation where Bedivere had its principal place of business, and in a magazine recognized as a source…
-
Guide
Take-Home and Secondary Asbestos Exposure
…levels many times the federal limit, and the epidemiology shows family members of high-risk workers carrying roughly five times the mesothelioma risk of the general public.⁴ For mesothelioma, the science recognizes no safe threshold…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · July 13, 2020 · in the opinion
Backe v. AW Kuettel & Sons, Inc. (2020)
…LLC, 884 N.W.2d 321, 328 (Minn. 2016) (quotation omitted). Caselaw recognizes two distinct types of personal jurisdiction: "general" jurisdiction and "specific" jurisdiction. Valspar, 495 N.W.2d at 411. "Personal jurisdiction refers to a…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 16, 2011 · in the opinion
Rome v. Asbestos Defendants (2011)
…1961, Kahr Bearing Corporation acquired the Arnot Marine Division of Aetna Steel Products Corporation. Kahr Bearing Corporation was sold to General Acceptance Corporation in 1967. In 1969, General Acceptance Corporation sold Kahr Bearing Corporation to Sargent…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 26, 2018 · in the opinion
Botta v. AERCO Int'l (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…1st Dept. 1984\]). Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D. 81, 38…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 19, 2017 · in the opinion
Blouin v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2017)
…¶ 11. Plaintiffs do not take issue with the foregoing general allegations. But given that their claims pertain to Avondale's failure to warn of the hazards of asbestos and failure to implement any of the known…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 29, 2020 · in the opinion
Jackson v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2020)
…25-8 at 1. Similarly, Blanchard was employed by Avondale for over forty years as a supervisor, general superintendent, assistant vice president, and vice president, during which time he "oversaw the construction of all vessels." R…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Beckering v. Shell Oil Company (2017)
…an employee of Shell and he performed work under Shell's direct and unfettered control. Beckering further argued that application of the Rowland factors did not support an exception to the general duty of reasonable care…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 19, 2017 · in the opinion
Aquitato v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…
-
Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · April 13, 1999 · in the opinion
Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)
…regard to either theory. The facts presented in this case show that H & V and Lorillard had a much closer relationship than that of a general component part manufacturer supplying parts to an end product manufacturer…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · January 26, 2017 · in the opinion
Wagner v. Standard Steel, Lcc (2017)
…Forge operated the plant under the "Standard Steel" name. In general terms, Freedom Forge was engaged in the business of "manufacturing and selling railway wheels, railway axles and other forged metal products from various facilities and…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 19, 2020 · in the opinion
Mata v. Liberty Utilities (park Water) Corp. (2020)
…its employees in the construction and service departments working with asbestos, it is not reasonable to infer from the company's general safety consciousness alone, that it is highly probable that the company was aware of…