185 results for “General Electric”, page 9 of 10
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 26, 2014 · in the opinion
Gillen v. Boeing Company (2014)
…proposed solution. Recently, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court cautioned that it "would not direct the substantive common law away from well-established general norms in the absence of some clear predominance of policy justifications." Lance v. Wyeth…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 28, 2022 · in the opinion
Falgout v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2022)
…Lockheed Martin Corp., 990 F.3d 852, 859 (5th Cir. 2021) ("unlike the general removal statute, the federal officer removal statute is to be \broadly construed' in favor of a federal forum"). Nevertheless, it remains the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 14, 2003 · in the opinion
Cossman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2003)
…28, 61 Cal.Rptr.2d 518.) Section 361 Requires Application of Indiana Law In general, whether a claim is barred by a statute of limitations "is a procedural matter governed by the law of the forum…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 20, 2008 · in the opinion
Thibodeaux v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2008)
…trial, district court entered a judgment on the jury verdict for the vessel owner, but granted the widow's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) and awarded general and special damages. The vessel owner appealed…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · February 27, 2024 · in the opinion
Burford v. Howmet Aerospace, Inc. (2024)
…In the second approach, "\[t\]he finder of fact is asked to infer that because the risk is demonstrably greater in the general population due to exposure to the substance, the claimant's injury was more…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 22, 2011 · in the opinion
In re Estate OF Holmes v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2011)
…720 N.E.2d at 258. However, a defen-dant who understands the general objectives of the conspiracy, accepts them, and agrees either explicitly or implicitly to further those objectives is liable as a conspirator." Dukes…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · February 27, 1992 · in the opinion
Stevenson v. Keene Corp. (1992)
…mid 1980's, concern over the insurance industry and tort litigation prompted many reports on both a national and state level. See United States Attorney General's Tort Policy Working Group, Report on the Causes, Extent…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · February 5, 2009 · in the opinion
Adams v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2009)
…5268, 875 N.E.2d 596, the General Assembly enacted Amended Substitute House Bill 292 ("H.B. 292") in response to the asbestos litigation crisis in Ohio.\[3\] The key provisions are codified in R.C…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · April 6, 2023 · in the opinion
Taylor v. BASF Catalysts, LLC (2023)
…According to Bevan, the case was dismissed because they were unable to find a co-worker at General Tire who could testify about the decedent's occupational exposure to asbestos. The Clark Lawsuit {¶ 15} On October…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 27, 2020 · in the opinion
Broussard v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2020)
…2018). In general, a civil action must be removed within 30 days of the defendant's receipt of a copy of the initial pleading "setting forth the claim for relief upon which such action or proceeding…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 11, 2022 · in the opinion
Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)
…., based upon policies of insurance, included but not limited to, employers' liability, commercial general liability insurance policies and/or excess liability insurance policies sold by Lamorak Insurance Company to Eagle, Inc. . . ."\[24\] This new allegation arises…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 12, 2022 · in the opinion
Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)
…382 F.3d 546, 562 (5th Cir.2004) (noting that "\[a\]s a general rule, questions relating to the bases and sources of an expert's opinion affect the weight to be assigned that opinion rather…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 17, 2018 · in the opinion
Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2018)
…and consortium. Id. \[25\] The Green court recognized a narrow exception to the general rule against recovery for premarital injuries in toxic exposure cases, where the injured spouse does not or cannot know of the injury…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 1, 2023 · in the opinion
Chenet v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (2023)
…misplaced. Unlike in Thomas, the trial court judge made only a general statement regarding potential appellate court reversal —the trial court commented that this court had reversed his prior decisions in other unrelated cases. Likewise, the…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · March 27, 2015 · in the opinion
Kaenzig v. Charles B. Chrystal Company, Inc. (2015)
…a result of his exposure to defendant's asbestos-contaminated talc through contact with his father. With regard to general causation, Moline explained that asbestos contains microscopic fibers that are easily inhaled deep into the lungs…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · May 21, 2019 · in the opinion
Zurich American v. Insurance Co. of North America (2019)
…indistinctness, or uncertainty in the meaning of the language in the policy. Language is ambiguous if it is reasonably open to different interpretations." Seeck v. Geico General Ins. Co., 212 S.W.3d 129, 132 (Mo…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 6, 2024 · in the opinion
Lagrange v. Eagle, Inc. (2024)
…Lockheed Martin Corp., 990 F.3d 852, 859 (5th Cir. 2021) ("unlike the general removal statute, the federal officer removal statute is to be \broadly construed' in favor of a federal forum"). Nevertheless, it remains the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 6, 2020 · in the opinion
Barr v. Parker-Hannifin Corp. (2020)
…brought this asbestos fiber home on his clothing and person. Mezei based this testimony solely on Kleinberg's job title of welder and the general epidemiological literature showing increased rates of mesothelioma among shipyard welders. However…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 27, 2024 · in the opinion
Perkins v. United States (2024)
…Government's actionable conduct. Plaintiff did not meet this burden of proof by presenting general evidence that there was asbestos work performed at H.J.'s worksite or expert testimony that H.J. would have been…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · July 30, 2014 · in the opinion
Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2014)
…the place of conduct factor does not favor one state over another because the alleged conduct is spread over multiple states. See, e.g, Patten v. General Motors Corp., Chevrolet Motor Div., 699 F. Supp. 1500…