No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

9 results for “Ford Motor Company”

  1. Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · April 30, 2007

    Henderson v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2007)

    James Henderson, a North Carolina resident, and his wife sued several manufacturers in South Carolina. They claimed he developed mesothelioma from asbestos-containing products he encountered working for many years as a boilermaker, pipefitter and…

  2. Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · September 1, 2021 · in the opinion

    Jolly v. General Elec. Co. (2021)

    …the product."). In Branham v. Ford Motor Company, our supreme court refined the risk-utility test to incorporate the American Law Institute's most recent definition of a design defect: A product ... is defective in design…

  3. Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · February 28, 2024 · in the opinion

    Edwards v. Scapa Waycross, Inc. (2024)

    …the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania's opinion in Rost v. Ford Motor Company\[2\] and claims the court of appeals improperly approved the use of the cumulative dose theory rejected in Henderson and Lohrmann. We disagree…

  4. Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · August 21, 2024 · in the opinion

    Jolly v. Fisher Controls International, LLC (2024)

    …831 (citations omitted). In Riley, following a motor vehicle accident involving Benjamin Riley and Andrew Marshall Carter II, Riley's estate sued both Carter and the Ford Motor Company. Riley alleged that Carter had failed to…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion

    Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)

    …Feb. 28, 2012); Whiting v. CBS Corp., 982 N.E.2d 1224, at [\1] (Mass. App. Ct. 2013); Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, 703 A.2d 1315, 1332 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1998); Rumery v. Garlock…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · July 21, 2017 · in the opinion

    Haskins v. 3M Company (2017)

    …later afflicted with mesothelioma, contributed to the formation of the disease." Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 2013 WL 214378, at [\1] (D. Utah Jan. 18, 2013); see also Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F. Supp…

  7. State law · South Carolina

    South Carolina Mesothelioma Lawyer: Asbestos Claims, Deadlines & Compensation

    …cases. Smith v. Tiffany, 419 S.C. 548, 799 S.E.2d 479 (2017) — No allocation of fault to nonparties before 2026. Wickersham v. Ford Motor Co., Op. No. 28003 (S.C. 2020) — Crashworthiness; proximate cause…

  8. Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · April 5, 2023 · in the opinion

    Glenn v. 3M Co. (2023)

    …been anticipated by the manufacturer or seller...." Small, 329 S.C. at 466, 494 S.E.2d at 844. Fisher cites Branham v. Ford Motor Co., 390 S.C. 203, 210, 701 S.E.2d 5…

  9. Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · August 3, 2022 · in the opinion

    Edwards v. Scapa Waycross, Inc. (2022)

    625, 151 A.3d 1032, 1044 (2016)); see also Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F. Supp. 3d 841, 846 (E.D.N.C. 2015) ("Also referred to as \any exposure' theory, or \single fiber' theory…