No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

16 results for “Ford Motor Company”

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 10, 2006

    Berger v. Amchem Prods. (2006)

    The court denied DaimlerChrysler's motions (joined by Ford and General Motors) to preclude evidence that brake and clutch dust causes asbestos disease, to dismiss the complaints, and for a Frye hearing, so the plaintiffs (Berger…

  2. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 22, 1996 · in the opinion

    Egan v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. (1996)

    …is to apply the law of the state with the most significant contacts. Lee v. Ford Motor Company, supra. \ \ \ \ \ \ \[If\] a true conflict exists, the second step is to determine which state has the most significant…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · November 5, 1997 · in the opinion

    Ciletti v. Raymark Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 1997)

    …and a reasonable person would conclude that the utility of the product did not outweigh the risk inherent in marketing a product designed in that manner." Denny v. Ford Motor Company, 87 N.Y.2d 248…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · January 27, 2009 · in the opinion

    Martin v. Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company (2009)

    …II. ANALYSIS A. Standard of Review As this is a diversity action, Kentucky substantive law applies. Gahafer v. Ford Motor Co., 328 F.3d 859, 861 (6th Cir. 2003). Procedurally, federal standards for summary judgment govern…

  5. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Coogan v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc. (2020)

    …We agree with the Coogans. a. Legal Principles In Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., the Supreme Court adopted the rule of strict liability for product manufacturers stated in § 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (Am…

  6. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · July 11, 2014 · in the opinion

    Bostic v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. (2014)

    …1965). \[44\] RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF TORTS: LIABILITY FOR PHYSICAL AND EMOTIONAL HARM § 26 (2010). \[45\] See id. § 26 cmt. j. \[46\] 232 S.W.3d at 772. \[47\] Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer, 285 Va. 141…

  7. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 5, 2013 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Airco Welders Supply (2013)

    …ENGINEERING, FORD MOTOR CO., FOSECO, INC., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION, GARLOCK, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GENERAL MOTORS CORP., GEORGE V. HAMILTON, INC., GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, GOULD PUMPS, INC., GREEN, TWEED & COMAPNY, INC., HAJOCA PLUMBING SUPPLY COMPANY, HARNISCHFEGER…

  8. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 5, 2014 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Airco Welders Supply (2014)

    …Engineering, Ford Motor Co., Foseco, Inc., Foster Wheeler Corporation, Garlock, Inc., General Electric Company, General Motors Corp., George V. Hamilton, Inc., Georgia- Pacific Corporation, Gould Pumps, Inc., Green, Tweed & Company, Inc., Hajoca Plumbing Supply Company, Harnischfeger…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · August 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Paroni EX rel. Estate OF Paroni v. General Electric UK Holdings Ltd. (2021)

    …474-75). To satisfy this minimum-contacts inquiry, the Court "recogniz\[es\] two kinds of personal jurisdiction: general (sometimes called all-purpose) jurisdiction and specific (sometimes called case-linked) jurisdiction." Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Campbell v. American Standard, Inc. (2009)

    …suitable place for the action, the court must consider a variety of factors, including whether the defendants are amenable to personal jurisdiction in the alternative forum. (Ford Motor Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America (1995…

  11. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 5, 2018 · in the opinion

    McKinney v. Hobart Bros. Co. (2018)

    …showing not only that Frank himself was qualified but also that his reliance on Dement's work was (1) customary in Frank's field and (2) reasonable. See Connelly v. General Motors Corp., 184 Ill. App…

  12. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 26, 2010 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Bostic (2010)

    …232 S.W.3d at 770 (quoting Union Pump Co. v. Allbritton, 898 S.W.2d 773, 775 (Tex. 1995)); see also Ford Motor Co. v. Ledesma, 242 S.W.3d 32, 46 (Tex. 2007). Thus…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 13, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)

    …the argument that plaintiff's disease "cannot be caused by a certain type of asbestos" and that this defense can be considered by the jury when determining causation); Michel v. Ford Motor Co., No. 18-4738…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 1983 · in the opinion

    Skip Fordyce, Inc. v. Workers'comp. Appeals BD. (1983)

    …Drass & Kelsey, Eugene Leviton, Jones, Nelson, Sisk & Ford and John A. Haley for Respondents. OPINION KAUFMAN, J. The Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) awarded death benefits to the widow of Homer Joe Barry, and the Workers' Compensation…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2010 · in the opinion

    Collins v. Plant Insulation Company (2010)

    …is essentially an immunity from suit, or whether it is based on a predicate determination the conduct in question is not wrongful under the law. Subsequent cases illustrate this distinction. In Ford v. Polaris Industries, Inc…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 15, 2022 · in the opinion

    Stansbury v. McCARTY Corporation (2022)

    …AND REASONS IVAN L.R. LEMELLE, District Judge. Before the Court are defendants Bertram C. Hopeman and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, as alleged insurer of Hopeman's alleged executive officers Albert Arendt Hopeman, Jr., Bertram C…