42 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 3
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · August 1, 2016 · in the opinion
Lund v. 3M Company (2016)
…district court case, Defendants argued that a Navy ship should not be considered a "product" for purposes of a strict liability claim. (Id. (citing Mack v. General Electric Co., 896 F. Supp. 2d 333, 345 (E…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · February 25, 2019
Harris v. CBS Corporation (2019)
Michael Roy Harris and his wife Elsie sued CBS Corporation, Ingersoll-Rand (IR) and other companies in California state court in Alameda County. They brought personal injury and loss of consortium claims. Michael Harris has malignant mesothelioma,…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · July 3, 2019
Viale v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2019)
Debbie Viale and Amber Jacobs sued Air & Liquid Systems (successor to Buffalo Pumps), Foster Wheeler, GE, Calaveras and other companies in California state court. They alleged Ronald Viale developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure at several…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · April 5, 2024 · in the opinion
Speck v. CBS Corporation (2024)
…Speck was to any work done on or around a General Electric product or product of another defendant\[,\]" and has "no idea" about the quantity of asbestos fibers to which Speck may have been exposed by…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 8, 2014 · in the opinion
Gottschall v. Crane Co. (2014)
…Johnson court's explicit approval of the reasoning of the federal court in In re Related Asbestos Cases. \[Johnson, supra,\] 43 Cal.4th at 69-70." (Gottschall v. General Electric (E.D.Pa., Dec. 9, 2011…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 12, 1998 · in the opinion
Arena v. Owens Corning Corp. (1998)
…reach the consumer in the same condition as it left the manufacturer\]; and Artiglio v. General Electric Co. (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 830, 71 Cal.Rptr.2d 817 \[silcone supplier not liable to user of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · April 29, 2019 · in the opinion
Toy v. Honeywell International Inc. (2019)
…by Daniel James Kelly, Tucker Ellis LLP & Nicole Elisabet Gage, Tucker Ellis LLP. Fryer-Knowles Inc., Defendant, represented by Charles Stewart Bishop, Sinunu Bruni LLP. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Derek S. Johnson, WFBM, LLP…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · May 16, 2019 · in the opinion
Toy v. Viking Pump (In re Toy Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…by Daniel James Kelly, Tucker Ellis LLP & Nicole Elisabet Gage, Tucker Ellis LLP. Fryer-Knowles Inc., Defendant, represented by Charles Stewart Bishop, Sinunu Bruni LLP. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Derek S. Johnson, WFBM, LLP…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 23, 1994 · in the opinion
Smith v. ACandS, Inc. (1994)
…The specifications provide that the contractor is to comply with all safety regulations and eliminate hazards to its own and other workers and that all work is subject to general supervision and inspection by PG&E…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 11, 1995 · in the opinion
Morton v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1995)
…may be admissible to prove what ordinary consumers of the product actually expect when those expectations are beyond the lay experience common to all jurors. (Soule v. General Motors Corp., supra, 8 Cal.4th at pp…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · August 28, 1997 · in the opinion
Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997)
…contained both amosite and chrysotile asbestos fibers. John McKinley, who worked as an electrician at Mare Island, recalled working with Rutherford in the early 1950's. He testified that Rutherford and he were often required to…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 8, 2018 · in the opinion
Foglia v. Moore Dry Dock Company (2018)
…secondary exposure, MDD challenged the evidence that Father worked for MDD at the shipyard as an electrician on ship conversion that had been introduced through decedent's deposition and Garcia's declaration as inadmissible hearsay, as…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 2, 2001 · in the opinion
Franklin v. Usx Corp. (2001)
…extent these arose prior to the closing. In addition, we note that the bill of sale contained specific and clear provisions relating to the buyer's general non-assumption of liability. It stated that "\[t\]he…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 24, 2024 · in the opinion
Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)
…causation standard, and then arguing that the second "substantial factor" prong is not met). Only in its reply does Eaton raise doubts about Plaintiff's actual bystander exposure to its asbestos-containing electrical products. Dkt. No…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California · September 13, 2021 · in the opinion
Darden v. Western Asbestos Settlement Trust (In re Western Asbestos Co., 2021)
…pecuniary injury suffered by loss of a relative, and distinct from any the deceased might have maintained had he survived. \[Citations.\].' As was stated in San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior Court (2007) 146 Cal…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 10, 1985 · in the opinion
Kaminski v. Western MacArthur Co. (1985)
…the refinery insulation business, or the insulation services provided to Pacific Gas and Electric Company; the court found that MacArthur acquired the necessary experience and knowledge in these specialized areas from employees of Western and the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 26, 2014 · in the opinion
Scott v. Ford Motor Company (2014)
…time employing as many as 17 workers. While operating the service stations, Scott became a member of an automotive trade association and earned certification in electrical systems, engine performance, and advanced engine performance from Automotive Service…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 10, 2006
Boyle v. Certainteed Corporation (2006)
…judgment for CertainTeed, holding San Francisco's General Order No. 157 invalid, and remanded; plaintiffs recovered costs. A local court's general order allowing expedited summary judgment in asbestos cases on 60 days' notice, supported only…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 15, 1990
Uram v. Abex Corp. (1990)
…run long before 1987. For Virginia's consortium claim, the court applied the general one-year statute with a discovery rule. It found she should likewise have suspected the cause in 1976, so her claim was…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 17, 1995 · in the opinion
Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995)
…the court was confronted with a complicated claim that General Motors' defective design of the wheel assembly and front floorboard enhanced the injuries the plaintiff suffered when another car collided with the left front wheel area…