28 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 17, 2009
Kirks v. General Electric Company (2009)
…district court denied the plaintiffs' motions to remand both cases to Delaware state court, holding that General Electric had established federal officer removal jurisdiction. A contractor may remove under the federal officer removal statute, construed broadly…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · May 15, 2019
Rogers v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
The magistrate judge recommended granting summary judgment to Warren Pumps, General Electric, Air & Liquid Systems, Charles A. Wagner Co., and Asbestos Corporation Ltd. against plaintiff Richard Rogers, because he could not show exposure to any defendant…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · May 13, 2019
Rogers v. Nosroc Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…Steinaker, Norfolk; DuPont Seaford plant, Seaford machinist mate USS Moale Newport 1966-1967; machinist mate performing pump maintenance USS Steinaker Norfolk 1967-1970; housekeeping DuPont Seaford plant Seaford 1966, 1970-1973; general construction, builder 1973 onward
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 30, 2017
Evans v. John Crane (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
Icom Henry Evans and his wife sued several companies in Delaware state court, and the case was removed to federal court. Mr. Evans developed mesothelioma, which he attributed to asbestos-containing gaskets made by John Crane. He said he removed and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 19, 2016 · in the opinion
Hillyer v. Mine Safety Appliances Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2016)
…LLC. Eaton Corporation, individually, Cross Defendant, represented by Joseph S. Naylor, Swartz Campbell LLC. General Electric Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. Gould Electronics Inc., Cross Defendant, represented by David Phillip…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 15, 2017 · in the opinion
In re Asbestos Litigation Evans v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2017)
…Allison L. Texter, Swartz Campbell LLC. Gardner Denver Inc., Defendant, represented by Krista Reale Samis, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. IMO Industries, Inc., Defendant…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Evans v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…Samuel I. Iola, pro hac vice. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. IMO Industries, Inc., Defendant, represented…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 26, 2018 · in the opinion
Pieno v. Crosby Valve (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…a claim under Florida law, a plaintiff must simply show that a defendant's product was a "substantial contributing factor" to the injury that occurred.\[11\] Faddish v. General Electric Co., 2010 WL 4146108, at [\3…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 13, 2021
Gilstrap v. CBS Corporation (2021)
…Robert E. Lee 1959-1964; trainee/trainer Nuclear Power School Idaho Falls 1964-1967; master chief, engine room supervisor / Chief of the Boat General Dynamics/Electric Boat shipyard (USS Omaha and USS Indianapolis) Groton 1975-1980
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Denbow v. CBS Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · December 29, 2016 · in the opinion
In re Asbestos Litigation Charlevoix v. CBS Corporation (2016)
…2013, a copy of which is available on the court's website, http://www.ded.uscourts.gov. \[1\] CBS Corporation is sued as a successor-in-interest to Westinghouse Electric Corporation ("Westinghouse"). (D.1. 147 at…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 5, 2016 · in the opinion
Evans v. Foster Wheeler Energy, Corporation (2016)
…U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1). (D.I. 1) Defendants CBS Corporation, f/k/a/ Westinghouse Electric Corporation\[1\] ("Westinghouse"), and Crane Co. ("Crane") joined in Foster Wheeler's Notice of Removal. (D.I. 4; D…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. Caterpillar (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…of 1963. (Id.) D. Plaintiff's product identification evidence Caterpillar Inc. Mr. Charlevoix stated that he performed maintenance work on eight Caterpillar bulldozers during his time at M.J. Electric. (D.I. 155, Ex. 1 at…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · November 20, 2019 · in the opinion
Mosher v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
… Ex. B at 243:7-245:12) He admitted that his work on the fire pump was limited to turning its electric motor on and off, and that he was not present when other individuals performed…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · October 27, 2017
Walsh v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…law, a plaintiff must show exposure to the defendant's product and that it was a substantial factor in causing the injury; general testimony about replacement parts, without evidence they were made by the defendant, does…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · November 29, 2017
Walsh v. Aurora Pump Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…was a substantial factor in causing the injury. The court found the Walshes' evidence did not support that inference and that they were stretching general testimony about replacement parts. Because they bore the burden of proof…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 13, 2019
Johansen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…law, a plaintiff must show exposure to each defendant's product and that the product was a substantial factor in causing the injury. A general recollection of a manufacturer's name, with no detail on where…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 19, 2017 · in the opinion
Evans v. CBS Corp. (2017)
…must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 19, 2019 · in the opinion
Evans v. Imo Industries, Inc. (2019)
…upon by Captain Moore extend to JCI because Captain Moore testified that "these documents are instructive for the general purpose of determining what the Navy's attitude towards warnings was at any particular point in time.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 23, 2020 · in the opinion
Pruitt v. Gardner Denver (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…The Court has reviewed the affidavit of Captain Moore and his opinion that: The 1972 general information book records one Gardner Denver horizontal centrifugal emergency fire pump driven by a diesel engine was installed in the…