17 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Maryland Appellate Court · February 8, 2024
Basil-Flippen v. General Electric Company (2024)
…Campbell Company installing asbestos insulation on a turbine at the Morgantown Generating Station in Maryland. The turbine was sold to the Potomac Electric Power Company by Westinghouse, which also had a separate contract to install it…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · August 14, 2020
Hailey v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)
The estate and family of Charles Anthony Shockley sued several equipment makers after he died of pleural mesothelioma in January 2016. Mr. Shockley served in the Navy from 1968 to 1972 as a machinist mate on the destroyer USS Henderson, working…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · May 5, 2017 · in the opinion
Dugger v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2017)
…Products of Connecticut Corporation, Cross Defendant, represented by F. Ford Loker, Jr., Miles and Stockbridge PC. General Electric Company, Cross Defendant, represented by David J. Quigg, Meringer Zois and Quigg LLC. Genuine Parts Company, Cross Defendant…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · August 28, 1996 · in the opinion
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett (1996)
…Fibreboard, Foster Wheeler, GAF Corporation, Garlock, General Electric, Owens-Illinois, Pittsburgh Corning and Westinghouse were cross-claim defendants. Crane Packing was found not liable and is not involved in this appeal. \[6\] See part III, section…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 30, 2019 · in the opinion
Dugger v. Union Carbide Corporation (2019)
…PC, Gary J. Ignatowski, Law Offices of Peter G Angelos & James Edward Garland, Law Offices of Peter Angelos, P.C. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by David J. Quigg, DeHay & Elliston LLP. Foster Wheeler LLC, Defendant…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · March 7, 2013 · in the opinion
Joyner v. AC & R. Insulation Co. (2013)
…the weight of the proof presented—that matters." Id. at 782-83. After reviewing the conflicting cases, this court finds the analysis in Hagen cogent and consistent with the general removal standard. 28 U.S.C. …
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 5, 1984 · in the opinion
Weinberg v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)
…Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof." 28 U.S.C…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 25, 2013 · in the opinion
Dixon v. Ford Motor Company (2013)
…Potomac Electric and held that the General Assembly did not intend for the cap to apply to awards in wrongful death actions. That ruling had a very short shelf life. In its next session, the General…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 1, 1999 · in the opinion
Owens Corning v. Bauman (1999)
…it is not within our purview to usurp [\766] the legislative function of the General Assembly or to overrule a decision of the Court of Appeals. Maryland Declaration of Rights and Maryland Constitution Amicus White Lung…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 29, 2012 · in the opinion
Dixon v. Ford Motor Company (2012)
…we agree with Ford's contention that "case reports" and other anecdotal evidence are not probative of either general or actual causation,\[14\] but we must point out that Ford severely overstates the strength of its…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002 · in the opinion
Crane, Inc. v. Scribner (2002)
…time, can metastasize to other structures, including the diaphragm and the abdominal cavity. Although there is a background rate of mesothelioma in the general population that is not asbestos-related, it is very low. Dr. Samuel…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · July 6, 2018 · in the opinion
Lloyd E. Mitchell, Inc. v. Rossello (2018)
…defendants; January 4, 2016 was the deadline for the plaintiff to name his "most likely to use" general product identification fact witnesses from the original fact witness list who have been previously deposed; January 18, 2016…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 29, 1990 · in the opinion
Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos (1990)
… 388 (1965), observing that the section had previously been adopted as a general principle in the duty to warn area by previous Maryland cases. Section 388 states as follows: Chattel Known to Be Dangerous for Intended…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 19, 2007 · in the opinion
O'connor v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore (2007)
…behalf. (Compl. ¶¶ 5-6, 8, 11-15.) These general allegations of injury, suffice at this early stage of the litigation. See White Tail Park, 413 F.3d at 459 (citing Lujan, 504 U.S. at 561…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 1, 2010 · in the opinion
Crane v. Linkus (2010)
…appellee's motion and entered judgment in the amount requested. Appellant noted an appeal to this Court. General Background Before addressing the causation issue in this case, it may be helpful to place it into context…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 19, 2018 · in the opinion
Vitale v. Burnham, LLC (2018)
…App. 438, 451 (2010) (citations and quotations omitted). "Mere general allegations of conclusory assertions will not suffice." Id. (citations omitted). Additionally, "a mere scintilla of evidence in support of the non-moving party's claim is…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · October 3, 2014 · in the opinion
May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)
…2d at 1369 ("\[t\]he rationale underpinning the general rule of strict liability is that it logically and fairly places the loss caused by a defective product on those who create the risk and reap the…