No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

18 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · October 14, 2010

    Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC v. Pittman (2010)

    Lonnie Pittman was named as a plaintiff in a December 2002 asbestos suit against many companies. Defendants later learned he had died in March 2001, almost two years before the suit was filed. His widow, Mary Pittman, was substituted as plaintiff…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · October 15, 2019 · in the opinion

    Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair (2019)

    …G. Wyly, III, PHELPS DUNBAR, LLP. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Edderek Linnel Cole, MARON MARVEL BRADLEY ANDERSON & TARDY, LLC. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT EDELBROCK CORPORATION LOUIS GUIROLA…

  3. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · December 12, 1990 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Edwards (1990)

    … 15-1-35, citing the general rule that the statute began to run from the date of publication of the allegedly libelous statement to a third person. Staheli argued that the statute did not begin to…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · December 10, 2009 · in the opinion

    Everitt v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2009)

    …Inc. f/k/a Flexitallic, Inc., and Wagner Electric Corporation n/k/a Federal Mogul, Inc., pursuant to which an agreed order of dismissal with prejudice was entered in the Anderson case on September 21, 2001…

  5. Exposure sites · Mississippi

    Mississippi Asbestos Exposure Sites: Worksites, Industries, and Trust Coverage

    …what employer, what years, what general areas of the plant or yard — and we build the rest. What if my loved one worked at multiple Mississippi sites? That is common and helpful. Multi-site Mississippi careers…

  6. State law · Mississippi

    Mississippi Mesothelioma Lawyer: Asbestos Claims, Deadlines & Compensation

    …including destroyers, amphibious assault ships, and Aegis cruisers for the U.S. Navy. Pipefitters, boilermakers, insulators, electricians, shipfitters, welders, and machinists worked around asbestos-containing pipe insulation, gaskets, packing, and refractory materials. The yard is listed…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 11, 2019

    Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2019)

    …altered it, or knew of the defect. A general allegation of failure to warn does not plead actual or constructive knowledge, so the defense appeared on the face of the complaint. Failure to Warn; Design Defect…

  8. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · March 17, 2005

    Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Gregory (2005)

    …Court reversed. It held that joinder under Rule 20 requires a distinct litigable event linking the plaintiffs, and that asbestos cases are not exempt. The plaintiffs had alleged only general negligence, different jobs, places, substances and…

  9. Court case · Mississippi Court of Appeals · July 18, 2006 · in the opinion

    Brooks v. Stone Architecture (2006)

    …Dr. Lorino repeatedly referred to "the literature" and "studies" in general. Courts are not required to "admit opinion evidence that is connected to existing data only by the ipse dixit of the expert," because self-proclaimed…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · June 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2021)

    …No. 451-13). \[4\] The Court cannot locate in Dr. Compton's consideration of general "asbestos-containing friction materials" any discussion of the causation attributable to Dickens's limited contact with Ford products. (See Dr. Compton…

  11. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · June 5, 2014 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Nix (2014)

    …known or potential rate of error; whether there are standards controlling the technique's operation; and whether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within a relevant scientific community. Id. at 37. The inquiry is flexible…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 11, 2021 · in the opinion

    Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2021)

    …in a general or regularly established manner." Id. (citing Phillips, 94 So.3d at 1063). The court further distinguished a Pennsylvania federal case where, "even though the plaintiff could not recall specifics, testimony regarding general occupational…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · September 13, 2022 · in the opinion

    Webb v. 3M Company (2022)

    …Inc., 200 F.3d 335, 339 (5th Cir. 2000). But unlike the general removal statute, the Court must broadly construe the federal officer removal statute in favor of a federal forum. Williams v. Lockheed Martin Corp.…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · November 21, 1980 · in the opinion

    McCarty v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1980)

    …1969) the Court stated: "Because this is a diversity case, the law of the state where the district court sat controls questions [\339] of res judicata and estoppel. See also Aerojet-General Aviation Corp. v. Askew…

  15. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · August 11, 2005 · in the opinion

    Gorman-Rupp Company v. Hall (2005)

    …asbestos products caused the plaintiff's injuries. (emphasis added). ¶21. In Chavers v. General Motors Corp., 79 S.W.3d 361 (Ark. 2002), the Arkansas Supreme Court adopted a test to determine the admissible evidence that…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · March 13, 2023 · in the opinion

    Simpson v. American International Industries (2023)

    …Am., 841 F.2d 1254, 1262 n.9 (5th Cir. 1988). "There is an exception to this general rule, however. \Nominal' or \formal' parties need not join in the removal petition." Farias v. Bexar Cty. Bd…

  17. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · March 18, 2004 · in the opinion

    Owens Corning v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company (2004)

    …case law above, substituting the foreseeability test, in place of finding the existence of a direct injury, is error. As a general rule, proximate cause requires that both be present " Id. at 236. We agree. ¶18…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · October 23, 2020 · in the opinion

    Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2020)

    …Mot. Summ. J., 7, ECF No. 370). There is no indication that Delaware has adopted the product line exception to the general rule against successor liability. See, e.g., The O'Brien Corp. v. Hunt-Wesson…