8 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · October 15, 2019 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair (2019)
…G. Wyly, III, PHELPS DUNBAR, LLP. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Edderek Linnel Cole, MARON MARVEL BRADLEY ANDERSON & TARDY, LLC. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT EDELBROCK CORPORATION LOUIS GUIROLA…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 11, 2019
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2019)
…altered it, or knew of the defect. A general allegation of failure to warn does not plead actual or constructive knowledge, so the defense appeared on the face of the complaint. Failure to Warn; Design Defect…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · June 9, 2021 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2021)
…No. 451-13). \[4\] The Court cannot locate in Dr. Compton's consideration of general "asbestos-containing friction materials" any discussion of the causation attributable to Dickens's limited contact with Ford products. (See Dr. Compton…
-
Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · June 5, 2014 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Nix (2014)
…known or potential rate of error; whether there are standards controlling the technique's operation; and whether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within a relevant scientific community. Id. at 37. The inquiry is flexible…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 11, 2021 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2021)
…in a general or regularly established manner." Id. (citing Phillips, 94 So.3d at 1063). The court further distinguished a Pennsylvania federal case where, "even though the plaintiff could not recall specifics, testimony regarding general occupational…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · September 13, 2022 · in the opinion
Webb v. 3M Company (2022)
…Inc., 200 F.3d 335, 339 (5th Cir. 2000). But unlike the general removal statute, the Court must broadly construe the federal officer removal statute in favor of a federal forum. Williams v. Lockheed Martin Corp.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · March 13, 2023 · in the opinion
Simpson v. American International Industries (2023)
…Am., 841 F.2d 1254, 1262 n.9 (5th Cir. 1988). "There is an exception to this general rule, however. \Nominal' or \formal' parties need not join in the removal petition." Farias v. Bexar Cty. Bd…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · October 23, 2020 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2020)
…Mot. Summ. J., 7, ECF No. 370). There is no indication that Delaware has adopted the product line exception to the general rule against successor liability. See, e.g., The O'Brien Corp. v. Hunt-Wesson…