7 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · January 23, 2003 · in the opinion
Harahan v. AC & S, Inc. (2003)
…Corp., Flexitallic Gasket Co., Flintkote Co., Foster Wheeler Corp., GAF Corp., Garlock, Inc, General Electric Co., General Motors Co., General Refractories, Georgia Pacific Corp., Green Tweed & Co., Inc., Hajoca Plumbing Co., Hercules Chemical Co., Inc., Herman…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · April 4, 1996 · in the opinion
Simmons v. Pacor, Inc. (1996)
…Bubash v. Philadelphia Electric Company, 717 F.Supp. 297 (M.D.Pa.1989) (emotional distress resulting [\678] from fear of contracting cancer is not recoverable absent physical injury); Friedman v. General Electric Company, 706 F.Supp…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 13, 2006 · in the opinion
Chenot v. AP Green Services, Inc. (2006)
…and (c) fails to exercise reasonable care to protect them against the danger. Pennsylvania law imposes no general duty on property owners to prepare and maintain a safe building for the benefit of a contractor's…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · January 4, 2023
Shellenberger v. Kreider Farms (2023)
…Failure to Warn; Premises Owner Liability; Employer and Contractor Liability, and Workers' Compensation; Wrongful Death and Survival Worksites: Kreider Farms dairy processing plant general manager of dairy plant operations Kreider Farms dairy processing plant 1972-1980
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 22, 1991 · in the opinion
Lilley v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1991)
…asbestosis sufferers in general and specifically by a person with Mr. Lilley's type of symptoms. Id. at 41-46. Dr. Altschuler offered no testimony regarding Mr. Lilley's psychological profile nor the general psychological characteristics…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 15, 2007 · in the opinion
Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Co. (2007)
…approach a situation to which the term judicial estoppel is applicable. ¶ 28 The doctrine of judicial estoppel holds that "\[a\]s a general rule, a party to an action is estopped from assuming a position inconsistent…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court · March 24, 1983 · in the opinion
Asbestos Insul. Co. v. Wcab (McGOVERN) (1983)
…the fact that Mr. McGovern was exposed to asbestos in this short period of time that you mentioned might probably have aggravated his general pulmonary status because of being exposed to the offending agent. You see…