21 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · September 1, 2021 · in the opinion
Jolly v. General Elec. Co. (2021)
435 S.C. 607 (2021) 869 S.E.2d 819 Beverly Dale JOLLY and Brenda Rice Jolly, Respondents, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, etal., Defendants, Of whom Fisher Controls International LLC and Crosby Valve, LLC are the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 19, 2021 · in the opinion
Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2021)
…worked on: Cutler-Hammer, Squire D., Siemens, Ellis, Allen-Bradley, Westinghouse, and General Electric. Id. at 101:8-22. Eaton has liability for Cutler-Hammer products. \[See ECF No. 384 p.2\]. Watson testified that he…
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · April 5, 2023 · in the opinion
Glenn v. 3M Co. (2023)
…Inc., f/k/a Daniel Construction Company, Inc.; Fluor Daniel Services Corporation; Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation; General Electric Company; Goodyear Tire & Rubber; Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Grinnell LLC, f/k/a Grinnell Corp., f/k/a ITT…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion
Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)
…Pa. July 29, 2011) (finding a duty to warn where defendant knew asbestos-containing replacement brakes would be used on its vehicles); Chicano v. General Electric Co., 2004 WL 2250990, at [\6] (E.D. Pa. 2004…
-
Exposure sites · South Carolina
South Carolina Asbestos Exposure Sites: Worksites, Industries, and Trust Coverage
…Navy built and repaired warships at Charleston, the government built its atomic plant on the Savannah River, and Duke Power and South Carolina Electric & Gas put up coal, hydro, and nuclear stations to power it all…
-
Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · August 11, 2021 · in the opinion
Keene v. Cna Holdings, LLC (2021)
… however, because those employees were overworked and needed rest, the owner contracted the work out to Collins Electric Company, the direct employer of the worker who was ultimately injured. We held the injured worker was the…
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · June 11, 2001 · in the opinion
Murphy v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2001)
…Corporation, ACandS, Inc., Rock Wool Manufacturing Co., Inc., The Anchor Packing Company, Rapid American Corporation, Garlock, Inc., Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Uniroyal, Inc., PPG Industries, Inc., Covil Corporation, E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company, Defendants…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · November 13, 2018 · in the opinion
Matthews v. EI DU Pont DE Nemours and Company (2018)
…Section 42-1-400 provides an exception to the general rule by imposing upon an owner or upstream employer liability for the payment of compensation benefits to worker who is not directly employed by the owner…
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · February 13, 2019 · in the opinion
Keene v. Cna Holdings, LLC (2019)
…an employee of a subcontractor commissioned to install an electrical system at a plant "being constructed for \[the defendant\] by a general contractor" was not the defendant's statutory employee because his work "was not a…
-
Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · April 30, 2007
Henderson v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2007)
James Henderson, a North Carolina resident, and his wife sued several manufacturers in South Carolina. They claimed he developed mesothelioma from asbestos-containing products he encountered working for many years as a boilermaker, pipefitter and…
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · August 3, 2022 · in the opinion
Edwards v. Scapa Waycross, Inc. (2022)
…814 (D.S.C. 2011)). "General causation \is generally not an issue in asbestos litigation' due to the parties' acknowledgment that exposure to asbestos causes mesothelioma." Id. at 625, 869 S.E.2d at 829 (quoting…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · March 29, 2018
Chesher v. 3M Company (2018)
…specific causation expert testimony, the plaintiff must present evidence of the amount and duration of asbestos dust exposure, and general allegations of periodic exposure over many years are not enough. Causation; Expert Testimony; Maritime Law and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · February 13, 2017 · in the opinion
Chesher v. 3M Company (2017)
…t is \[\] unfair to require manufacturers of nondefective products to shoulder a burden of liability when they derived no economic benefit from the sale of the products that injured the plaintiff").\[16\] As a general matter…
-
State law · South Carolina
South Carolina Mesothelioma Lawyer: Asbestos Claims, Deadlines & Compensation
…these cases; punitive damages are capped. What evidence do we need? A diagnosis and a general work history are usually enough to start. We rebuild the rest. Do I have to come to your office? No…
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · January 5, 2022 · in the opinion
Covil Corporation EX rel. Protopapas v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (2022)
…s operations allegedly exposed persons to asbestos, resulting in claims and lawsuits against it. Penn insured Covil under comprehensive general liability policies between March 1986 and March 1988. One of the lawsuits against Covil, Rollins v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · August 3, 1992 · in the opinion
Metal Trades, Inc. v. US (1992)
…or incapacitating reversible, illness and is thus within the statutory definition of hazardous waste as provided by RCRA.\[9\] "As a general rule, statutory definitions declaring what a term \means' exclude any other meaning." Colautti v…
-
Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · August 21, 2024 · in the opinion
Jolly v. Fisher Controls International, LLC (2024)
…but paid only to settle the wrongful death claim. Justice James then did exactly what the General Assembly required in subsection 15-38-50(1). He compared the "amount stipulated by the release or the covenant…
-
Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · July 24, 2024 · in the opinion
Covil Corporation EX rel. Protopapas v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (2024)
…recognition of the role notice provisions play in insurance contracts," and stating, "Had the General Assembly intended to categorically prohibit the enforcement of notice clauses in all policies, it would have done so." 427 S.C…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 27, 2016 · in the opinion
Dandridge v. Crane Co. (2016)
…injuries, and consequently, less justification for a departure from the general rule under maritime law that "a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in…
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · November 22, 2023 · in the opinion
Protopapas v. Wall, Templeton & Haldrup, PA (2023)
…20, 26, 630 S.E.2d 474, 477 (2006). In the civil context, there are three general exceptions to the mootness doctrine. First, an appellate court can take jurisdiction, despite mootness, if the issue raised is…